Myths and misconceptions about osteoporosis and osteopenia
Posted , 5 users are following.
Apparently there are a few myths and much misinformation even coming from doctors who sometimes seem to know little about osteoporosis or osteopenia.
Reading up on women's health and with all the reading I have been doing there were a few surprises.
Two jumped out at me. Note these come from a reputable place.
One was that biphosphonates do no harm. Second was the one that made me sit up and take notice. Osteopenia is not the same as osteoporosis one does not lead to the other. Theses are apparently myths.
2 likes, 25 replies
Anhaga kathleen65757
Posted
kathleen65757 Anhaga
Posted
They are saying the opposite to doing no harm!
Anhaga kathleen65757
Posted
kathleen65757 Anhaga
Posted
What I am saying is we cannot assume anything!
Soozib kathleen65757
Posted
Thanks again for all your research. New information is so important for us all to have so that we can make informed choices about our bones. If you have any links that you can pass on, please do.
kathleen65757 Soozib
Posted
There is so much information that key words being up many to choose from and from there be discerning and even compare what is being touted.
Aristotle13 Soozib
Posted
Soozib Aristotle13
Posted
Aristotle13 kathleen65757
Posted
I couldn't remember whether you have seen the presentation on Utube or if you are interested. If you want the link, let me know and I'll message it.
Aristotle13 kathleen65757
Posted
As you know I've been gathering as much information as I could and you along with several other conributers, have been very helpful. As a result of my reading and the sudden chest pains (attributed to AA) I have at last had enough messing about and decided this morning that the pill was not worth taking and I will use the information that I already have to make my own way through the maze of options. I'm convinced that the AA route is far too dangerous to travel unless you have no reaction to it and then there is probably lots of grief stored up for the future. I will still have the option of resuming the AA if I should have a change of heart but I think that that is unlikely. The only regret is that I might find it difficult to get a scan unless I can convince the Dr that it is a necessary thing. I shall obviously continue to monitor and maybe contribute if appropriate. Many thanks to all who have caused me to think and helped me to make my decision. I'm still a bit wavery about this but the first step on a long journey has already been taken. (Chairman Mao I believe)
Anhaga Aristotle13
Posted
On a less serious (I hope) note I was refused a Vitamin D test. My daughter who is a dietitian told me that all the doctors in Nova Scotia were told to stop sending people for that test once it became "popular". But in my case, I had active sarcoidosis some years ago and there is some disagreement about whether large doses of Vitamin D are bad for people with sarcoidosis. Also I have a diagnosis of osteopenia and am on steroids. So it seems if anyone should be eligible for a Vitamin D test it would be someone like me. Similarly you should be eligible for a bone density scan.
Aristotle13 Anhaga
Posted
I am in the UK, Northeast coast. It depends on which Dr you get and how they are feeling today as to what sort of treatment you are eligible for. This is probably a slightly jaundiced view of what happens sometimes in an overworked system that tries to cope with a lot of time wasters and usually does a fair job of it. A previous attempt to get a rescan (after two years) resulted in a six year wait by which time I had OP and osteopenia. After I've been off AA for a while and when the year is up since the last scan, (October) I shall ask for bone density scans and vitamin D and Calcium tests and see what happens.
I think that it is marvellous the way conversation members look out for each other. I'm very impressed and extremely grateful. Just talking about the problems helps to clarify them and usually presents a way forward. Judging by your numbers, you have been around this website for some years. I do hope that things go well for you.
Anhaga Aristotle13
Posted
kathleen65757 Anhaga
Posted
kathleen65757 Aristotle13
Posted
I think we are the best judges when it comes to checking or rechecking that!
My GP wants me to have it anyway just to make sure it is not deteriorating fast.
Your input is always appreciated Aristotle!
kathleen65757 Anhaga
Posted
I think government's use the overuse excuse to save money but it is the doctors and patients who should decide what tests are needed. Politicians do not usually have medical degrees.
So much is picked up on the blood tests and adding vitamins to counteract a shortage of vital vitamins can prevent further cost to the health system anyway.
Aristotle13 kathleen65757
Posted