Need help understanding

Posted , 2 users are following.

I was tested positive for hsv-2 Saturday. Igg specific came back positive for . Igm came back negative. Pcr results also negative. I went my doctor appointment today an the doctor told me that I was only exposed an that I could of got it years ago but I'm not infected and that I don't have risk of ever spreading it. I just don't understand. I was tested December 2014 for hsv an it was negative for herpes . An I was only just recently with someone who was infected. Can someone please help

0 likes, 21 replies

21 Replies

Next
  • Posted

    I'm afraid that means you are infected. If you have HSV-2 IgG antibodies, it's because your body detected enough HSV-2 virus to mount an immune response. There is no such thing as having antibodies but not being infected and merely exposed. So, you do have it and you can transmit it, even without symptoms via occasional viral shedding. I would see a different doctor!

    • Posted

      My i g g index was 9.36. I think maybe the pcr is negative cause i was recently exposed
    • Posted

      No, the pcr was negative because you simply weren't shedding at the time of your swab test. Shedding is not all the time, so if you were to test by pcr every day for a year, it would be positive on some days only, even though you are infected. To do with the herpes virus having periods of latency and active shedding.

    • Posted

      Oh! That is never advised for routine herpes screening. Definitely change your doctor... With respect to herpes, pcr is only good for swab tests, NOT blood. The virus is not blood-borne (pcr looks directly for the virus), but antibodies are. Only in rare and serious cases is the virus found in blood by pcr, hence why it is not used for routine herpes screening.
    • Posted

      I just definitely need a different doctor. I was already at terms with it now got over depression. After he said I was exposed not that I was not infected not risk spreading it I was happy. An now I'm depressed cause it don't make sense. I got I g g test December 2014 it was negative. Now it's positive. He can't be right

    • Posted

      He shouldn't have ordered IgM either, but that's a more common mistake by doctors. Between the pcr blood test and his incorrect conclusions/advice, I would seriously go elsewhere the next time.

    • Posted

      Trust me, he's very wrong and I can't believe a doctor would dispense such misleading and irresponsible info/advice. Sucks that he raised your hopes. Even worse that you have it, of course, and how your bf knew all along, then stopped talking to you after he gave it to you. I'd be so upset and furious!

    • Posted

      My ex called an first thing he said yesterday was I'm sorry . I'm sorry I didn't inform u. But I no I just got infected . I don't understand how it showed on I g g so quick though.an yes I can't believe my doctor an to say that I'm not at risk at spreading an that I was only exposed an not infected. It makes me wonder how many others he has said it to

    • Posted

      IgG would normally take up to 2-3 months to turn positive for many to most people, but some people seroconvert faster than others. When did you get back with your ex?
    • Posted

      I spoke with a new doctor today. Yes it can take 2-3 months. Everyone's immune system is different though. So that isn't true in some cases. My immune system is weeak. I smoke , I drink, I have emphysema, thyroid nodule on my neck. An I don't eat right so my immune is very weak. A person with a weak immune can notice signs up to 3 days of infection an other cases a month. Some 3- 4 months. So it depends on the individual themselves. Not all cases are the same on results. That's what my new doctor explained. An also he said my family doctor that told me I was only exposed not infected an had no risk spreading is absolutely wrong.

    • Posted

      The new doctor I talked with on phone said I need to change my habits because it's going to progress a lot quicker being as my immune is not having a good response to it

    • Posted

      An igg can be positive within 3 to 5 days after infection with a weak immune system.
    • Posted

      Actually, I believe it's supposed to be the opposite! People with weak immune systems often fail to mount a robust immune response, so tend to have fewer/delayed antibodies, etc.

    • Posted

      Maybe you need to do more research. This new doctor is very experienced. An I'm sure wouldn't give me false information. You can't base just your own experience with everyone else. Everyone is different

    • Posted

      I think you need to do more research. My new doctor is very experienced and I'm sure is not gone give me false information. An I've even Google about weak immune system so what your saying is definitely wrong. Talk to your own doctor get more information instead of trying to pretend that your doctor of the year. An I've also talked to others about it an they say what he said is true. A friend of mine she has had it for years an she said same thing as well.

    • Posted

      My, my, defensive! Of course, everyone is different, but even so, *detectable* levels of HSV IgG antibodies in less than a week is very unlikely. And I did look that up just now. Not going to get into a debate about weak immune systems and IgG, as that's not my area of interest. Was just stating what I think I've seen written before. Anyway, good luck with your new doctor. At least this one is giving you better advice than the first one!

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.