New here. Recently diagnosed with polymyalgia.
Posted , 9 users are following.
Hello, I have been diagnosed with polymyalgia 4 weeks or so ago. Symptoms had been creeping on for several months and got so bad eventually I got my gp involved. Despite bloods coming back clear, he felt polymyalgia was the cause. I was given prednisalone 40 mgs. Within 24hrs I could walk, climb stairs, dress without pain. It was remarkable. After one week the dose was reduced to 35mgs as I was pretty hyperactive and experiencing several bouts of arythmia and palpitations a day. Although he didn't know of these symptoms as a side effect of the drug, he decided it was the way to go. The palpitations all but disappeared within 3 days as did the hyper feeling. He then asked me to reduce to 20mgs. Suddenly the muscle and joint pain returns. I put myself up to 25mgs to see if there was any improvement but to no avail and as each day passes it gets a bit worse. I'm not due to see him until next week, but I'm wondering if he has reduced too quickly. Consensus of advice appears to be that very slowly wins the race. Would be grateful to hear your thoughts
0 likes, 32 replies
EileenH karen48559
Posted
I have to say - a doctor who doesn't recognise that lot as symptoms of pred side effects needs to go away and do some reading! He needs to do some reasing anyway - 40mg is far too high a dose to start a query PMR patient on. The whole point of starting with 15-20mg is as a confirmation of the diagnosis: other things that cause the symptoms will probably respond at least to some extent to such a high dose. As you have found, there are considerable side effects at high doses, the moderate doses are associated with far fewer.
Has the doctor made sure you don't have any of the other things that can cause the symptoms? Including a vit D blood test - very low vit D can do it too. Follow this link
https://patient.info/forums/discuss/pmr-gca-website-addresses-and-resources-35316
and you will find a load of links to resources. Amongst them is the "Bristol paper" - maybe it would help your doctor manage you. It was written to help GPs diagnose and manage patients with PMR, there is also info about GCA but that belongs in the hands of a specialist ideally.
To some extent many of us manage our own doses but generally in collaboration with helpful doctors. If someone is reducing and it fails, as you have done, we then often suggest a return to a higher dose and trying again.
I would suggest you might need to try 2.5mg drops at this stage - a reduction should never be by more than 10% of the current dose. But I would also think you tried to reduce far too soon. You obviously are one of the 20% of patients who doesn't have raised ESR and CRP which makes monitoring your progress rather trickier. But you need to stick at the dose that gets the symptoms under control for at least a month before even thinking of a reduction - all the current inflammation needs clearing out first. Very few people are totally pain-free and it does depend to a great extent how long the antiinflammatory effect of pred lasts for you - it may be it isn't lasting the full 24 hours and a split dose might work better for you.
But I also feel that he needs to do a bit more digging if he hasn't already done so - if it is PMR then it is typical for 20mg max to achieve a 70% improvement in symptoms within a week. Too high a starting dose and you miss that bit of confirmation. There are also other things that often appear alongside PMR that also respond to high doses of pred but return as the dose is reduced - myofascial pain syndrome is one. That's an "as well as" - not necessarily an "instead of".
karen48559 EileenH
Posted
ptolemy karen48559
Posted
EileenH karen48559
Posted
However - IF he suspected GCA then he shouldn't be reducing you as fast as this. Did the headache return at 20mg? There is a lot of information about managing GCA in that Bristol paper too and maybe your discussion with him should be based on that paper. Weight LOSS is normally regarded as a sign of PMR and GCA, not weight gain - though I put on a fair bit of weight because of not being able to move.
There are other things that should have been ruled out too - but I imagine he did a full blood count for all the haematological things like white cell count, red cell count and haemaglobin? That would cover a lot of them.
karen48559 ptolemy
Posted
EileenH karen48559
Posted
Because of my belief in SLOW reduction I would say reduce 2.5mg at a time at the most and, again, remain at each dose for a month. No reduction should be more than 10% of the current dose - so by 20mg you are already down to 2mg at a time. From there 1mg is simpler and kinder to the patient.
karen48559 EileenH
Posted
EileenH karen48559
Posted
Glad to hear you already feel better.
karen48559 EileenH
Posted
I'd like to thank you all for your guidance and support and wish you all a speedy recovery. xx
EileenH karen48559
Posted
Now you've found us don't run away - we're a nosey lot and like to know how things go!
karen48559 EileenH
Posted
ptolemy karen48559
Posted
old_nanna EileenH
Posted
EileenH old_nanna
Posted
I assume too that if you are expecting great grandchildren you are probably older than me and have had them all - in fact you have said you have:
"Why are people born before 1957 exempt from receiving MMR vaccine?
People born before 1957 lived through several years of epidemic measles before the first measles vaccine was licensed. As a result, these people are very likely to have had the measles disease. Surveys suggest that 95% to 98% of those born before 1957 are immune to measles. Note: The "1957 rule" does not apply to women of childbearing age who could become pregnant. (Because rubella can occur in some people born before 1957 and because congenital rubella and congenital rubella syndrome can occur in the offspring of women infected with rubella virus during pregnancy, birth before 1957 is not acceptable evidence of rubella immunity for women who could become pregnant.)"
You probably DO need whooping cough vaccine as the immunity fades over a period of 4 to 20 years - but it is normally a triple shot including tetanus and that is a no-no for you. There are single ones I think though. That is also a question you have to ask about any vaccine - whatever it was that triggered your reaction to the tetanus shot may be present in any other vaccine. All these vaccines are live ones - if you were still on pred you couldn't have them at all.
However, if these girls are refusing to let YOU near their babies I hope they are also not intending taking them outside at all - the illnesses are spread by droplets after a sneeze for example. They can't ask everyone they meet if they have had their shots! And that is exactly why they have been offered vaccinations themselves during pregnancy - the immunity is transferred to the baby via the placenta and lasts until it gets its own shots at 2 months or whenever it is. So the first question is: "Did you have your shots during pregnancy?". If not - they are as great a risk to their children as you are. Immunity also takes a bit of time to develop - it isn't instantaneous.
EileenH
Posted
old_nanna EileenH
Posted
EileenH old_nanna
Posted
I think the vaccination you had at 5, in the 1930s may have been for diphtheria and/or tetanus TB and smallpox - measles vaccine was only developed in the 1950s and the rest far later. I was vaccinated against polio in the late 1950s and that was the first vaccine I had.
Funny though - my concern would be for YOU catching something from the kids not them from you!
old_nanna EileenH
Posted