Osteoporosis results range for different parts of the body
Posted , 7 users are following.
I have been diagnosed with osteoporosis based upon DEXA results taken from hip, forearm and spine. Spine is over -3.0 hip is around -2.5 and forearm is -0.3. Coincidentally I had full body DEXA scan that showed that overall I was OK, - meaning arms, legs, skull were good while ribs, spine and hips not good. In terms of cause, low Vit D appears to be the issue, still doing other tests but not yet finding smoking gun at this point. What is the reason for the range of results across different parts of my body? As I play active sports does this mean my legs and arms get enough stimulation from muscles onto bone to create or prevent bone loss, while the spine and hips don't get enough stimulation to prevent bone loss? This does not seem to make sense as both spine and hips should be stimulated by all weight bearing exercises, just as arms and legs do?
0 likes, 23 replies
ruby06073 tbulley
Posted
If it does not make sense I would suggest to do some research of your own on the net. that's how I started and decided for the future I would go to the doctor for a diagnosis but cure myself when ever this is possible.
Anhaga tbulley
Posted
I think we all have variations throughout our body. Often the spine is a little worse than the hips, probably, as you suggest, owing to the fact that the different parts of our body function differently and are used differently from one another. To improve my spine density I wear a weighted walking vest. I also took up Nordic walking which is supposed to improve upper body strength. Because of the exercise I do and some changes to my nutrition and addition of a few supplements I have improved my t-score without medication. All of the parts measured improved in one year, but the variation amongst them stayed roughly the same. I'd say the hip improved the most, and I guess that's to be expected as the major weightbearing joint in the body it will respond to whatever extra exercise is performed, whereas in my case I have to be careful of existing osteoarthritis in the spine so I don't injure my back. Physiotherapy helps with that.
tbulley Anhaga
Posted
Anhaga tbulley
Posted
I'm no good at math. The improvement in the t-score was from -2 to -1.6. i have no idea how to calculate a percentage.
I can't do the jumps because I have quite severe osteoarthritis in my spine and hurt myself if I cause too much impact. I understand that even walking downstairs is helpful for the bones!
I'm not a gym person. I just use the Nordic poles sometimes when I am out for a walk in my neighbourhood. I have an autoimmune disease called polymyalgia rheumatica which makes it difficult for me to exercise vigorously.
The advantage of a weighted walking vest is the way the weights are comfortably distributed over the torso to avoid straining shoulders or back muscles.
I disagree about your endocrinologists's cavalier attitude towards low Vitamin D. He has no way of knowing how long the level was low before being tested, for one thing. It could have been at an optimum level when the bones were being formed and only recently declined with lifestyle changes. We know we need Vitamin D in order to absorb calcium. We also need other vitamins and minerals to properly use calcium - things like magnesium and Vitamin K2. I believe it is now widely accepted that we need these other nutrients, especially K2, to prevent calcification of blood vessels and organs like the kidneys,
I understand the suggestion to start with a bone med although in your shoes I'd probably do what I could to improve matters naturally first. Prolia is probably a very bad idea, however, as there is no guarantee you will ever be able to stop taking it. It is denosumab and it's been found there's a significant risk of rebound osteoporosis after discontinuing this drug, so people are now being advised to take another drug after stopping Prolia. This is a disappointment because Prolia gave very good results. The rebound osteoporosis, or development of microcracks and fractures, is a direct result of discontinuing the drug, so this is definitely a drug which should be reserved only for specific situations where medical intervention is absolutely necessary and other drugs are contraindicated.
tbulley Anhaga
Posted
Hi Anhaga, thankyou for your reply. I agree with you on the Vit D and related minerals and Vit. The fact that my Vit D levels increased by 50% in 7 weeks shows I had previously not been getting enough, hopefully this will result in some bone recovery – but from what I understand this takes at least a year. During the 7 weeks (and continued beyond) I took relatively few Vit D supplements, around 1300iu per day, but got 10 mins most days in midday sun which my research tells me can give up to 10,000iu each day provided the skin is OK - and I dont have a good skin, besides being 60yrs old, my skin is thin and dry.
Also agree with your comments on osteo drugs, however I was unaware of the specific side effects of Prolia. Did some more research and it looks like as usual, all the drugs have a dark side. I have managed to treat my health naturally over the years mostly avoiding drugs, but the osteo stuff is new to me, so though its bad news to see the side effects, thankyou for brining this to my attention, so I will follow natural ways for at least the next 18months. I will change my specialist as well and try find someone with a broader perspective.
Back to exercise, I found a reference to biodensity where 4 exercises, chest press, leg press, crunch and a lift, each static and held for 5 seconds at moderate to high intensity known as osteogenic loading system. Its supposed to improve muscle strength and stimulate bone grow. See www.biodensity.com[/b] without muscle soreness etc
Anhaga tbulley
Posted
Good luck with it all. If you google healthunlocked my osteoporosis journey you will find an account of what I've been doing.
The Prolia information might have been known for some time but the general public only became aware of it a few months ago because of media coverage. Another case of industry hiding inconvenient truths!
tbulley Anhaga
Posted
I had Dxa scan as a I broke 5th metatarsal in foot after a bad fall (as it happens my legs and feet are OK in terms of bone density), I noted that if I had weak bones I would have broken many more in the fall, I also tripped in a gutter a couple of months after the break and did not break anything. Have you seen any information that contrasts bone density and bone strength - they are different things but perhaps its hard to measure actual strength and people equate density with strength. As people note some of the meds make bones more brittle at the same time as increasing density. My Calcium/Mg/Phosphate levels are well within the normal range, but still tend towards low side. As they tested to see why I was getting osteo but still active, have tested various others. The tests that are borderline are cortisol (at upper edge of normal range) and mid normal for other tests (cortisol saliva) so doing more tests for Cushings and waiting for these results. Others tests outside normal or right on the limit. SHBG is over threshold which pushes my available testosterone down (but still within normal range), renal phosphate threshold is below, urine creatinine is at high end of normal. As the ranges vary depending upon different authorities/organisations, like Vit D, some say below 50nmol is lower limit, others say it should be 75nmol.
I am heartened by you and others here that are pushing back and have made gains going the natural way of focussed exercise, diet and supplements to deal with osteo. When my tests came back, initial focus was on some underlying pathology for osteo, and assumed I would just take drugs for osteo. Endocrinologist has not found anything definitive in tests thus far, but still waiting for result of Dexamethasone Suppression test. As far as I can tell Vit D and related (k2), as well as high normal cortisol and low normal avail testosterone could be the cause of osteo - perhaps even Vit D deficiency alone.
I am also taking a plant based mineral supplement
Anhaga tbulley
Posted
I remember a discussion about how to test for bone strength and unfortunately it involves an invasive biopsy, which no patient would want and no doctor would order. The DXA scani s the best we have, but it's only a guide, and because the bone density of a small light-framed woman is not differentiated from that of a large-boned woman it is a clumsy measure at best. If you are ever in a room full of people who have been diagnosed with osteoporosis you will find they are overwhelmingly, although not exclusively, thinner people. had a fracture, tibial plateau, which was called "fragility" when they measured my risk factors, but considering the circumstances I think anyone would have suffered a serious injury. And given I'm a bit of a klutz I should, like you, have broken more bones in recent years, but I haven't. Touch wood!
I think the Vitamin D level is very important and may have had more to do with your bone thinning than any other single factor. Personally I think Vitamin K2 is essential. I've also noted someone posting on either this or the healthunlocked forum about a condition I think is called parathyroidism (not sure) which, once corrected, also stops the bone thinning.
Anhaga
Posted
tbulley Anhaga
Posted
The reason I raise the bone quality question is the info on some of the negative side effects of drugs that retain old bone instead of allowing old bone to be removed and new, stronger bone to be formed, as well as the risk factor of fracture being over 2.5 T score as well as having fractures from mild falls. It means that BMD becomes the gold standard. I also have a thin light frame and tall, so am at higher risk, however so far (touch wood) when I have broken bones that have been severe impacts. Once again I think the medical default is to assume a fracture must be because of weak bones not because of a serious impact or fall. I have normal parathyroid levels, until now I had never heard of parathyroid, according to the reams of tests I have my total and ionised calcium with normal PTH indicates normal parathyroid status. I have compromised gut function, avoid gluten, lactose, sugars, and soy so with food avoidance and actual gut issues my absorbtion as well as a lack of things in my diet are probably part of the underlying cause over the past 10-15 years that I have been aware of gut problems. Part of this has been an issue absorbing fat and as Vit D is fat soluble, it makes me think that lack of Vit D is central to my issues. I manage to do a fair amount of exercise, but not as well spread across the week or year as it probably should be. I see comments about boron and prunes being good things to take as well as the Vit D spray to give better absorption in mucous membranes instead of the gut - I have been using the spray for past 9 months. I am also experimenting the biodensity machine exercises on normal gym equipment. As there are 4 exercise, chest press, leg press, ab crunch and lift, machines with enough weight can be set up to give a multiplier effect on body weight. What puzzles me is the frequency of the biodensity is just once a week in the trials, surely 3-5 times a week would be more effective.
tbulley Anhaga
Posted
Anhaga tbulley
Posted
I think this is a puzzle for us all, and also shows what a clumsy tool the DXA scan and t-scores are. Each of us is measured against a standard derived from a young adult of our own sex. There is another measure, z-score, which compares us with our age cohort, but I think that's even less useful and I don't know how many of us are even told this score. It is my understanding,l although I can't remember where I read it, that there are different standards in different countries, so the standard to measure a relatively light-framed person native to the subcontinent of India is different from that used for a larger-framed Scandinavian, for instance. In countries where there's a wide variation in ethnic origin, as in the Americas or Great Britain and its former dominions, it must be impossible to come up with a truly reliable system. Certainly one size fits all isn't great, but it seems to be the best we have at the moment. Maybe the people who standardize these things could develop a formula taking into account not just things like our height, age and relevant medications, but also measure our wrist circumference, or some such body part, which could be an indicator of our build and thus be able to personalize our scores more accurately.
Anhaga tbulley
Posted
tbulley Anhaga
Posted
Anhaga tbulley
Posted
I can't remember if I suggested you read my own account, forgive me if I'm repeating myself. Google healthunlocked my osteoporosis journey for my account of what I did, and still do, for my bones.
tbulley Anhaga
Posted
Anhaga tbulley
Posted
Test a new fermented food with caution, give your gut time to adapt. When I bought kombucha for the first time the vendor said, no more than four ounces to start. There's a chance canned sauerkraut has been sterilized, otherwise it would continue to ferment, but maybe you are using the term "canned" generically, as I think that's also used to describe foods which have been home-canned, but are actually in glass jars? The fermented veg I buy is in glass jars and I always loosen the lids when I get home with them to let the gas buildup escape! Kombucha can get pretty fizzy, too, like soda pop!
tbulley Anhaga
Posted
Thanks Anhaga. My daughter has had kombucha in the fridge before and I regarded it with suspicion, it got chucked because it was not drunk. We will resurrect it and share. I will try and be careful of overdosing myself. My problem is that I am very disappointed by the ineffective medical advice that I have received and so have many on these forums. I am researching my blood tests results in detail and coming up with questions and insights not even considered by my specialist. While he might have decided that I am not qualified to absorb the obtuse science, his dismissal of Vit D deficiency among other things is a real concern. Perhaps you have seen this article about the DEXA as a predictor of fracture and the haste to prescribe drugs - a real concern. I am also seeing so much about the benefits of boron supplementation many of them applicable to me. The whole chain of Vit D, Mg, Ca and K2 not even raised by my specialist while postponing any drug treatment until a 2nd DEXA is done. I must thankyou again for your insights to me and others, you are a real gift to us here, no doubt you do the same in other spheres of your life. My canned sauerkraut is indeed tinned from the supermarket, I will hunt some down from better sources.
Osteoporosis: the emperor has no clothes.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497616/ ;
Anhaga tbulley
Posted
Yes, I know that article, and if anyone else is reading this thread I recommend they read it!
There's interesting threads on the Bone Health forum on Healthunlocked, and it's easier to post recommendations as the monitoring is not so tight. Fortunately Patient now allows posts from a number of the best sites to be posted without having to be moderated first, like the one you've shared.