Osteoporosis results range for different parts of the body
Posted , 7 users are following.
I have been diagnosed with osteoporosis based upon DEXA results taken from hip, forearm and spine. Spine is over -3.0 hip is around -2.5 and forearm is -0.3. Coincidentally I had full body DEXA scan that showed that overall I was OK, - meaning arms, legs, skull were good while ribs, spine and hips not good. In terms of cause, low Vit D appears to be the issue, still doing other tests but not yet finding smoking gun at this point. What is the reason for the range of results across different parts of my body? As I play active sports does this mean my legs and arms get enough stimulation from muscles onto bone to create or prevent bone loss, while the spine and hips don't get enough stimulation to prevent bone loss? This does not seem to make sense as both spine and hips should be stimulated by all weight bearing exercises, just as arms and legs do?
0 likes, 23 replies
kathleen65757 tbulley
Posted
If your bones have not been broken then assume they are strong. Our results here do not differentiate between small people and taller, bigger boned people which makes my husband sceptical. He has back pain so we assume osteoarthritis as he has that in his knees as well.
tbulley kathleen65757
Posted
Hi Kathleen, thanks for your reply. I live in Perth and had several full body dexa scans as part of a university study (unrelated to my osteoporosis) as well as a specific scan for osteo on my wrist/arm, hip and spine, however the results of three consecutive full body scans in the study run within minutes of each other varied by 1.8%. Your comment about strong bones not breaking is interesting, see this reference talking about bone density and bone quality, meaning there is probably more to the osteoporosis story than just bone density. It appears that medicine in its wisdom is applying a normalised protocol based upon one metric because its simpler. I am sure more bone density is a good thing but likely there are other factors to consider and most practitioners take the path of least resistance that says, "you appear unwell but I don't have the diagnostic skills or time , just take a course of antibiotics and see if this works."
https://www.mdedge.com/ccjm/article/95089/endocrinology/bone-density-vs-bone-quality-whats-clinician-do/page/0/1
kathleen65757 tbulley
Posted
Your variation in results is not so good though. I have become a sceptic.
oscar80077 tbulley
Posted
only my experience:
i suffered osteoporosis to my leg after ankle fracture. "don't worry it'll be fine very soon!!" i ended up breaking almost every bone in my foot instead even taking integrators.
tests and exams luckly only showed a mild intolerance to milk. other bones are ok.
we expected the bones to be even weaker after the new fracture, instead they look identical.
my grandpa has never suffered even when 88, my uncle allready has a prescription.
it's just not easy to forsee