Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Posted , 16 users are following.
I was diagnosed with PAF late into 2011 and episodes came and went and never really caused me too much discomfort. However at the time I was prescribed Flecainide and Warfarin by cardiac specialist. I've continued with this medication since then but haven't experienced an AF episode since Jan 2013 - is it the drugs or am I over it?
I'm 'happy' taking the Warfarin (I'm 63 and reducing stroke risk is good!) but wonder what, if any, are the long term implications of taking Flecainide. I've asked for medical opinion and I'm told that its not clear why the AF episodes stopped so 'keep taking the tablets'.
Any similar cases out there?
0 likes, 24 replies
CroydonGeorge
Posted
I do hope you do NOT discontinue the meds you're on without approval. This type of heart problem is now so very common and nobody seems to know exactly what a permanent 'cure' is. Good luck to you Malcolm and best wishes for a continuing trouble-free heartbeat.
marco
Posted
I find it interesting the different meds. prescribed for this condition. I've had PAF for about 10 years and like you tolerate it reasonbly well. No racing pulse, fainting or disability but do feel tired after an episode. I was prescribed Sotalol when my PAF started which has a side-effect causing palpitations, the very thing it was prescibed to prevent. Couldn't get an explanation as to why Sotalol was prescibed other than 'it's the standard med. of this condition' and cheapest presumably. Since giving up Sotalol (and Ramipril) the number of episodes has reduced from about 18 to 12 /year..
CroydonGeorge
Posted
Seems to coincide with my thoughts on this heart problem. The 'meds' route to alleviating PAF seems to be largely 'suck it and see'. Most cardio consultants have different ideas, or so it seems to me. My Bisololo dosage has increase from 1.25 mg daily to 2.5 mg daily to 5 mg daily and now 7.5 mg a day - all starting on 20 Feb! So, within nine days it has been quickly increased because the drug has had little or no effect. It is, as per usual, a trial and error routine. Goodness only knows how many different beta blockers are available but quite a few I should imagine.
The only other route seems to be invasive surgery, such as ablation - which again does not seems to be a permanent 'cure' in many cases, even though the cardio's say it is about 95% successful. A friend of mine had TWO ablations followed by a quadruple bypass op. Not the sort of route I'd relish but it might be classed as a 'kill or cure' approach. Electric shock treatment (cardioversion) also seems just a temporary halt to an erratic heartbeat in many cases, sometimes having no effect at all.
I do wonder if one simply stops all the high blood pressure drugs, the beta blockers and suchlike and just soldiered on with dear old Warfarin, or one of the newer anticoagulents.
teachtj
Posted
I have learned to control the atrial fibrillation. stay away from the major triggers: caffeine, alcohol, any kind of nervous system stimulant. another thing you should investigate is your body's food intolerances. I also need to limit the wheat and/or the gluten.
drink plenty of pure water daily. about half your body weight in ounces. stay hydrated. coconut water is good for hydration. it also adds potassium.
magnesium is a "defibrillator". epson salt baths at night, magnesium oil rubbed on the skin, magnesium supplements all minimize atrial fibrillation.
try to walk about 2 to 3 miles daily or at least five days a week.
stay away from artificial sweeteners and artificial flavor enhancers like MSG and all of its derivatives.
Best of luck to you.
marco
Posted
It's when meds. continue to be prescribed when it's obvious that they cause serious side-effects, as they were with me, that I can't understand.
malcolm96513
Posted
teachtj
Posted
This almost always converts me to NSR (Normal sinus rhythm)
For me, I would not take it daily. This is a rhythm control med, whereas Toprol XL is a "rate" control med.
Best luck to you.
CroydonGeorge
Posted
Matabar
Posted
I am scheduled to have an ablation this month and am looking forward to it. I hate meds and the ones I've tried don't help the Afib anyway. They just give me terrible side effects.
This procedure as described by my doctors and many hours of reading on the subject is not invasive surgery. It is a minimally invasive procedure that is done with catheters. No cutting open the chest, in fact no cutting at all. And ablations have nothing to do with bypass surgery. Ablations work on the electrical system of the heart and bypass surgeries are for a clogged up plumbing system. In other words, if your plumbing is OK, as mine is, your ablation will not lead to future bypass surgery. The other point is that the first ablation you have often doesn't work but, the second has a much greater percentage chance of being successful. That's why I'm going for my second one. I will report back as to the outcome. I'm thinking positive thoughts!
Just wanted to clear this up as I understand it. I wouldn't discourage anyone from looking into this procedure which has improved tremendously over time and has a very good success rate for complete recovery.
marco
Posted
Was offered an ablation two years ago and consultant said that there was a 70% chance of success at each procedure. Turned the offer down as I said above I can cope with my PAF reasonably well and at the time I was on meds. that could have caused or aggravated it. I've since taken myself off these.
But for me an ablation is still an option.
Matabar
Posted
marco
Posted
I'll look up Dr Narayan's work.
hugh52255
Posted
robin71805
Posted
Do you take a beta blocker as well as the Flecainide?
hugh52255
Posted
No I don't take a Beta Blocker. Apparently some of them (perhaps all of them) interact badly with Flecainide. I do however take Valsartan which is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, to control my blood pressure.