Personal PAE at UNC Experience
Posted , 15 users are following.
Hello everyone,
Well as promised here is the start of my weekly documentation of the results of my PAE procedure. I had it last Tuesday (08/09/16) at UNC in Chapel Hill NC by Dr. Isaacson and his great staff. The prep and procedure were totally painless - it is true! I am a cowardly lion when it comes to anything medical but all the pre-procedure worries were in my head and unjustified. The only scary part was being wheeled into the procedure room but once there my high-tech nerdness took over at seeing all the 24th century Star Trek equipment and asking all about it.
I had expected a lot of post-procedure pain, especially with my 300gm prostate dying off but I have had NO pain at all or any discomfort whatsoever - no blood in the urine, no constipation, even the small incission in my left wrist and the IV spot in my right hand have heeled. True I have been on heavy duty drugs ( prednisone; heavy ibuprofen; antibiotics ) so these could mask the discomfort. These drugs finish tomorrow (Tues) so I'll after that. My peeing symptoms are better but that could just be the heavy inflammatories to keep my urethra open. Over the past month I had to self-cath a few times due to AUR. But I opted to take prednisone during the 3 weeks leading up to the PAE instead to keep me open.
Here's a brief summary of my BPH. I am 67 and otherwise ok. I started BPH symptoms 20 years ago and dealt with it the usual way until 2003 when I started taking alpha-blockers ( alfusozin). From 2005 to 2011 I added Proscar and then switched to Avodart until the present. The 5-alpha reducatse inhibitors destroyed my quality of life but kept me peeing. My prostate grew from 150 to 300 gms during the past 5 years but my saving grace is no median lobe or bladder obstruction. My current PVR is 350ml.
I refused to let my uro here butcher me with a turp or prostatectomy, but he did get to do 3 TRUS needle biopsies over the years, all of which were negative though he was quick to warn me that there must be PCa hiding in there somewhere.
I do hope the PAE works for me so I don't need a life-altering surgery. Even a 10% size reduction would really open up my flow. Right now it is too soon to tell.
I also had 2 liquid biopsies ( MiPS and Apifiny tests) for PCa. These are urine and blood tests that look at the molecular level for indications of PCa - my tests were extremely low. Also while my PSA is 12 now, it is the psa density that is important and again mine is very low. I mention all this because it is really important to eliminate PCa before focusing on BPH.
Dr. Isaacson and his staff were the best I have ever seen. He doesn't make you come in the day before for MRIs and CT scans since his new equipment allows him to see all the arteries and decide how to proceed realtime. Also, if your hand arterial flow is good (which he tests before the procedure ), then he enters through the wrist rather than the femoral artery which will save you a lot of discomfort afterwards and is much safer. I looked at the few other IRs doing PAE in the US and concluded he was the best. The wonderful people on this forum educated me, reassured me and guided me with this decision. I hope to return the favor now to others.
So I will update here every week and let you know how I am doing. And please post here with all questions/comments. I sure hope it works, even if I have to do it again in a few years ( when it may be covered by Medicare - it cost me $6450 plus $200. for drugs). The money is well worth it to avoid what the uros have to offer.
All the best to everyone.
Neil
3 likes, 161 replies
nealpros Howard31850
Posted
Neil,
Don't be surprised if you have some minor problems urinating for a few days. The Prednisone, and anti inflammatory that you take immediately after the PAE, cause a "false" decrease in your prostate size for a few days. Dr. Isaacson uses that so that it makes up for minor swelling that the PAE might cause. So after they are stopped, you can still have a little swelling, but it won't be as bad as it might have been immediately after the procedure. So don't worry, and look forward to more improvement again later.
Neal
Howard31850 nealpros
Posted
dennis47445 Howard31850
Posted
glenn77 dennis47445
Posted
Howard31850 dennis47445
Posted
Hi Dennis - no it doesn't hurt at all once you get used to it. In fact it will restore your bladder tone to full health over time to the point you don't need to do it that often. There's a guy on another thread here who teaches how to do it (jimjames). He taught me evrything and if you want I'll give you the link. I had hoped to stop sefl-cathing now but I guess not for awhile till the PAE works its magic. It's all in the technique and choosing the right catheter. I can help you with that if you wish. Some guys who refused drugs and surgery for their BPH just self-cath. There are some who had lost most of their bladder tone due to BPH but by self-cathing initially 6 times a day could restore full bladder function to where they just self cath once a week. I admire them!! Good luck. Neil
glenn77
Posted
dennis47445 Howard31850
Posted
dennis47445 glenn77
Posted
Howard31850 dennis47445
Posted
Hi Dennis - I thought that too a few months ago but then I learned about CIC which stands for Clean Intermittent Catherization. So it is for people like us who can still pee ok but are not emptynig our bladders. Over the years as we build up more and more PVR our bladder continues to lose its ability to empty or tone until we end up with a failed bladder ( and possible kidney disease ) and then need a permanent catheter. So as BPH progresses and makes it more difficult for the bladder to empty fully we can help it keep its tone by self cathing to keep the PVR near zero. For people like me with a PVR near 350ml I should be self-cathing 4 times a day but I don't because I pray that the PAE will open up my urethra and let my weakened bladder muscles empty it. By emptying it every day the muscles rgain their strength and then you have to cath much less - maybe just once a week or not at all. jimjames gives a great description at this thread:" Self Catherization. An alternative to Turp, Greenlight, Holep ...? ". He is a great teacher and will answer any questions right away. Also I started a thread a while back for help self-cathing and got a lot of help. Here it is: " New to Self Cath ". Good luck. Neil
ed70868 Howard31850
Posted
dennis47445 Howard31850
Posted
Neil, you don't know how much I appreciate your comment. I was under the impression that the bladder, once flacid, will not regain its strength! I felt a sense of hopelessness, about my situation. You gave me hope, about urinary retention problem. I want to learn more about CIC. Do you have an email address, that I can contact you with? I took your advice and went to JimJames thread.
Howard31850 ed70868
Posted
ed70868 Howard31850
Posted
Howard31850 dennis47445
Posted
Howard31850 nealpros
Posted
nealpros Howard31850
Posted
Neal
Howard31850 nealpros
Posted
Neil
nealpros Howard31850
Posted
I had a 3t and sent it to Dr. Isaacson. He read it and recommended second PAE. UROLOGISTS are frequently not reliable advisors when it comes to PAE. PAE is done only by interventional radiologists, not UROLOGISTS, so UROLOGISTS make no money on it. Therefore, they recommend it "very infrequently".
Neal
Howard31850 nealpros
Posted
Also I am curious why he thinks a second PAE will help? Are there additional arteries now that branched off, or did the original embospheres dislodge? Did he tell you any details? Thanks Neil
mark1234567890 Howard31850
Posted
Hi Neil - I researched prostate MRIs recently and as I recall:
There are 2 strengths of MRI machines 1.5T and 3T. The 3T is better, giving improved resolution.
With the 1.5T machines, they always place some sort of detector internal the rectum for the prostate studies.
With the 3T machines, they do it both ways; detector sometimes internal to rectum, sometimes outside of rectum.
I think that I would prefer the external 3T approach.
I am claustrophobic. However, I find that the "large bore" MRI machines are infinitely more tolerable. The internal diameter is much greater. Also, the length is shorter, so usually your head is outside the tube, or close to it.
I always tell them to turn up the ventilation air through the machine to max, which really helps.
Although severely claustrophobic, I have never had a problem with the large bore MRI (great machine).
I am not 100% certain, but I believe that 3T machines are available large bore, if you can find the right hospital.
They also have "open" MRI machines for claustrophobic patients, but I could not tolerate it at all.
Mark
Howard31850 mark1234567890
Posted
Neil
mark1234567890 Howard31850
Posted
Neil- I think that they can find arteries that feed the prostate with the CT. I wonder if they can know if they found all significant arteries that feed the prostate. Maybe they need to go in again and find some more ateries to embolize? I am hardly an expert; just speculation on my part. I know that you are in contact with experts.
Anyway, from what I have been told, 2 weeks is too soon to give up hope for improvement. Hope that you have success. Please keep us updated. Mark
geoff90305 Howard31850
Posted
Geoff
Howard31850 mark1234567890
Posted
Thanks Mark for your good thoughts. I wonder too if all the relevant arteries were embolized. Dr. Isaacson said that the majority of the necrosis stage would be complete after a week or so which is when the pain is supposed to occur but I had no pain. I have offered to fly back to UNC for an MRI to see if and where the necrosis is and is not but my offer was turned down. I don't mind doing another PAE even now as it was very easy - but I don't want to keep self-cathing after all this if some arteries were missed or new branches opened up. I'll update next week. Thanks. neil
Howard31850 geoff90305
Posted
geoff90305 Howard31850
Posted
Yes, great claustrophobia not an issue. I recently built a house and it is on steel piers. At one end of the house, the bearers are approx. 600mm from the ground. When I was doing the plumbing etc, I made a wheel trolly to slide under the bearers to make work easier and quicker.
From looking on this site, seems many peole who had the PAE, took several weeks before benefits arrived.
I had my MRI results yesterday. PIRAD2, which basically means, Low risk. Clinicaly significant cancer is is unlikly to be present. They did say though BPH was found. I guess at 67, not surprising. So far, other than a rising PSA, I have no issues what so ever. I now need to work out why PSA rising, with no serious PCa issues found. Maybe just the BPH?
I am from Brisbane, Australia.
nealpros Howard31850
Posted
I agree with Mark's comments. I must have had the external sensor since there was nothing up my butt for that test.
There is another test, the ultrasound, where they DO put a probe up your butt to measure the size of your prostate, and how much urine you are retaining. It is painless, and takes less than a minute.
I didn't directly discuss your questions with Dr. Isaacson, but I had the impression that he was going to embolize different arteries.
Neal
nealpros Howard31850
Posted
I just keep my eyes firmly closed, then there's no way of knowing how close the machine is to my face.
Neal
Howard31850 nealpros
Posted
Howard31850 geoff90305
Posted
Thanks Geoff - you must enjoy caving! That's good news about your MRI. BPH certainly will elevate your PSA due to more prostate tissue producing more of the protein that the PSA tests for. Keep an eye on it but at 67 that is doing pretty good to just start the symptoms as most us started in our early 50s - nature can be cruel that way.
All the best
Neil
geoff90305 Howard31850
Posted
Yeah Neil, I have been seeing all you guys with chronic BPH and serious problems, and thinking, umm, when it it my turn? I was born with a urethra stricture, some where high. Had two DVIU over 20 years when in my 20's and 30's. Did not make too much difference, but while I might be a tad slow, umm, thinking about this, what is the defination of a slow stream? it always starts/stops never dribbles or leaks and no pains. Was recomended to get a urethroplasty, but sounded pretty drastic for some thing that aint broken, so put it off 37 years ago, and still pretty good.
I guess I try and keep the little bugger(prostate) has healthy as I can
I noticed on the Radiologists report he mentioned a few times where he saw 'the transitional gland demonstrates a typical benign nodular pattern' and 'the multiphase dynamic post contrast T1 weighted series shows a typical benign pattern of enhancement'. So, I guess I am develping the dodgy tissue to cause me problems further on. Prostate is 37cc, so still not too enlarged.
Anyway, important to contribute where I can on these forums, as one day go will I and the information is fantastic as real world.
Geoff
Howard31850 geoff90305
Posted
Neil
nealpros Howard31850
Posted
Neal
geoff90305 Howard31850
Posted
Geoff
geoff90305 nealpros
Posted
Geoff