Possible cancer? I’m so scared
Posted , 7 users are following.
hi all. Very sad at the moment and terrified. I recently went for an MRI for gastritis, and the report found some hypointensity signal at the peripheral of my prostate.
went to a urologist immediately, and we did a rectal exam. Doctor said he couldn’t feel any lumps and prostate wasn’t enlarged ( also confirmed by MRI). Did. PSA text, it came back at 0.33. I am 42 years old. The doctor however couldn’t explain away the MRI signal so I decided to get an MP MRI done. Just got the results back, and was given a PI RADS score of 2.
im really worried ( I know score of 2 means cancer is unlikely) and even my Uro said he thinks less then 10% chance of cancer. But my other tests seem to come out normal, DRE , PSA but then wouldn’t I get a PI RADS of 1?
anyways decided to go get a prostate biopsy done against the recommendation of my doctor, he said if it was him, he wouldn’t do something invasive right now. But I’m so scared and worried, we can’t come up with any other explanation for my MRI.
What do you all think?
0 likes, 22 replies
Triplets VisualDeadlock
Posted
VisualDeadlock Triplets
Posted
Triplets VisualDeadlock
Posted
RichardKen VisualDeadlock
Posted
Good luck Richard. Who had prostrate cancer four years ago.
Pepasan VisualDeadlock
Posted
The problem is that a biopsy can find cancer but because the needles can miss where there might be cancer cells, it cannot eliminate the possibility of cancer being present. I had a 12 needle biopsy and only one suspicious cell was found. Several years later I had a 'saturation' biopsy of 36 samples and a couple of cells were found. I therefore have a diagnosis of Gleason 6 (3+3) adenocarcinoma of prostate. My PI-RAD is 3. I remain on active surveillance. No treatment for the cancer.
Relax - you don't need a biopsy!
Triplets Pepasan
Posted
VisualDeadlock Pepasan
Posted
My Uro says we will be doing a transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy - 12 core. How come you decided on no active treatment?
Pepasan VisualDeadlock
Posted
I was 63 at the saturation biopsy stage when the official diagnosis was made. I'm 68 in June this year.
52331 VisualDeadlock
Posted
geoff90305 VisualDeadlock
Posted
Be great if you had more PSA tests done for a few earlier years. Then you could see if there is any steady but relentless doubling progression. It is the rise in PSA over say a 12 month period that gives the warning signal. I would be ecstatic with your 0.33 PSA. Mine hovers between 2.2 and 2.5 over the last 15 years.
The PIRAD of 2 is very good. If you had the MRI with a good MRI machine and good radiologist, then you probably have no issues. That was the same score I achieved. Radiologist said, unusual to get a PIRAD of 1 in an adult, as the prostate tissue becomes more dense as we age, and a score of 2 is good.
Do not go down the very invasive biopsy route unless absolutely warranted..eg, the MRI can see and measure the PCa lesions, your PSA is rising and you want to assess how aggressive the PCa is.
I would wait three months and get another PSA done and go from there.
For me, it turned out I'd previously had a massive UTI attack my prostate a few weeks before my annual blood tests, which spiked the PSA to 15(in 3 months) from my average of 15 year average of 2.4. DRE was normal. All the various blood tests(PSA Free and PHI) said high chance of PCa. The MRI said PIRAD 2...stop worrying. My PSA is still falling back, indicating the prostate can take many months to recover.
VisualDeadlock geoff90305
Posted
Thanks for your reply. I was happy with my 0.33 PSA score, but also realize that it is low because of my age (42). From what I understand, it increases the older you get, so I guess its relative.
The comment about PIRAD of 1 being uncommon in adults is reassuring - that was whats really worrying, I assumed withm y PSA, age, normal DRE, and no family history of cancer, that the PIRAD would have been 1, and it bothered me that the two Uros I saw didn't really have an adequate explanation of what they saw on my general MRI.
As far as the biopsy goes, I figured the risk was low (as explained to me) with some minor discomfort such as bleeding for a few days potentially, that there was no harm getting it done. I tend to worry a lot, and peace of mind is worth a lot to me. I did email my Uro and confirmed that it was going to be a transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. From what I have read here, that is not the BEST type of biopsy to get, but is it good enough for now?
RichardKen VisualDeadlock
Posted
Triplets RichardKen
Posted
VisualDeadlock Triplets
Posted
When I was talking to the doctor today, I asked if we should be doing a fusion biopsy (something we had talked about a few days ago), and he said based on my MRIs that it wasn't needed as the problem areas were pretty common and fit the template. I kind of assumed that meant a template biopsy? Is there a difference between that and a transrectal us guided biopsy?
Pepasan VisualDeadlock
Posted