Prostatic Artery Embolization procedure
Posted , 19 users are following.
As a health professional, I was worried about the effects of a TURP procedure. Although my urologist was against doing a PAE, saying he did not know about it and that it was experimental, the research I had seen suggested it would be a good approach with no effects on sexual function and fewer complications that a TURP.
Since PAE is a relatively new procedure, the effects of it have been measured for a space of 3-5 years post-procedure in the research currently available.
I went ahead and had the procedure done 4 weeks ago. The results have been simply wonderful. All symptoms of BPH have dissappeared.
Prior to the procedure I had painful urination, weak flow, frequent urinary urges, around 100 ml of urine output each time I voided,and the ultrasound revealed that my bladder was almost full after urinating. I was concerned that it could lead to hydronephrosis in the future.
I now get up 2x a night to urinate. I measure my output at home, and my nightly volume exceeds 300 ml each time I go, sometimes to 400 ml or more. My daytime urinary output is approximately 250 ml at each urination with no urges, no spotting, no burning sensation or a need to push using a valsava manuever. It just flows out naturally with no effort.
The research on it show that results are operator-dependent. That is, the more experience the doctor doing as, the more successful and less complications.
I flew from the west coast to have the procedure done at UNC Chapel Hill since their team, and Dr. Isaacson, have been doing well over a hundred of them. Great staff.
Please note that the PAE is a procedure that urologists do not perform. It is done by interventional radiologists. I have noted in a commentary that I read in a urology magazine, and in the attitude of my initial urologist, that there can be some prejudice about exploring a PAE since it is a procedure that would be done by someone who is not a urologist. It's outside their turf. My urologist insisted that I needed a TURP - while guarranteeing me that I would have retrograde ejaculation for life afterward if I did the TURP. That is not an issue with a PAE. I positive side effect is that the interventional radiologist discovered during the procedure that I had a venous shunt from my penis to the prostate, which had an detrimental effect on maintaining blood flow when erect. He sealed it off during the procedure. It turns out that a number of men have this without knowing it.
It feels like when I was urinating 25 years ago. I am so relieved and happy about it that I wanted to share this with you in case some of this information is helpful.
I had the advantage to access to a number medical journals on the procefure, but google scholar on the internet will have good info.
A recent systematic review of PAE is titled:Short- to Midterm Safety and Efficacyof
Prostatic Artery Embolization:
A Systematic Review
Ziga Cizman,MD,MPH, AriIsaacson,MD, andCharlesBurke,MD
0 likes, 175 replies
Howard31850 333health
Posted
333health Howard31850
Posted
I found out by good fortune when I ordered a US of the abdominal wall on myself late in the Spring because I thought I had somehow gotten an inguinal hernia doing endurance cycling.
The morning of the ultrasound the inguinal pain was gone, but since I knew that the imaging center had reserved that time for me, I did not want to just not show up. I thought it was the right thing to do, and also thought that things happen for a reason, so why not do it.
garyh1954 333health
Posted
I too, contacted UNC Dr. Issacson and he said I could come there for the procedure but it wouldn't be covered insurance wise since it's a new procedure. They had some Federal grant money but it ran out so, I'd be on my own money wise.
I wound up having the procedure done @ Hackensack medical Center here in New Jersey by interventional Radiologists Dr. John DeMerritt. Like you, my Urologists wanted to do a SupraProstatectomy but, after considering the 7 day hospital stay with catheter, I decided to look elsewhere, much to my urologists chagrin.
Again, like you, all my BPH symptoms vanished with the P.A.E. procedure. No more emergency peeing sessions. No more getting up 6 to 8 times a night to pee for 5 seconds.
And, I'm no longer two horrible drugs, Finesteride or Tamsulosin.
Good luck with your continued recuperation and the shrinking of your prostate.
Howard31850 garyh1954
Posted
333health garyh1954
Posted
garyh1954 Howard31850
Posted
Hi Neil,
I've been seeing my uro guy for about 4 years. My treatment was Finesteride and Tamsulosin. My prostate size was 200 and my psa was very low, like .75. The Uro guy wanted nothing to do with the PAE, not even discussing it. He wanted me to have the Supre-prostalectomy, which I believe is the same as a TURP. Anyway, when he talked about a week in the hospital with a catheter, bleeding, incontinence, etc., I told him forget.
My peeing 6 to 8 times a night was history almost overnight with the PAE. My interventional radiologists went in via the femoral artery without anesthesia. After the 5 & 1/2 hour proceudre, I laid on my back for another 5 hours. They then took out the catheter and I was released. I had no bleeding, no contraindications from the procedure, and have experienced continuous recovery from the BPH symptoms. a week after the procedure I was off both Finesteride and Tamsulosin.
Men with B.P.H. need to get out of the stone age of T.U.R.P. and enter the new age of P.A.E. being done at a Medical Centre near you. If not, then go find one. Your on your own cause your Urologists ain't helpin' you at all!!!.
Hope this helps.
Howard31850 garyh1954
Posted
kenneth1955 333health
Posted
333health kenneth1955
Posted
Hi Ken,
Funny you should ask about what he said, since I was not going to talk about it specifically unless asked. I have just written a book about healthcare and about the necessity to investigage, question, and freely ask doctors about their recommendations.
This wasn't just a urologist; it was the Chief of the Urology Department in a well-known and very regional large hospital. He was visibly upset when I told him I wanted to do it.
First he said that he did not know about the PAE procedure, so I showed him the systemic review article, and I added that there was other promising short and mid-term research, and that UNC, Stanford and other prominent places were doing it.
He said it was experimental and that it was, his exact phrase "bulls..t" He used that term three times in the conversation. When I pointed out that respected clinics around the country were doing them he said they were just out to make money.
I picked my jaw off the floor at that one, and proceeded to tell him that an interventional radiologist in his hospital/health clinic had been given the ok by his own hospital to do them, that he had been doing them for two years, and that I had talked to this radiologist, who said he was getting research-level results.
My urologist was still upset, and said his colleague was just giving anecdotal evidence.He said that TURP was the gold standard and that is what I needed, that I would eventually come back to him for it.
Needless to say, I moved on and had the PAE done.
Here's an ironic coda to the story, one that I have detailed in case it helps those reading this who have a tendency to follow an authority figure's suggestions without really checking it out: the urologist did a cystoscope on me before we talked about the TURP. The cystoscope gave me for the first time in my life, a UTI. The culture showed it was due to colonization, which came from the cystoscope.
Perhaps life was sending me a message not to follow his recommendation.
kenneth1955 333health
Posted
fj20848 333health
Posted
Hi Gary,
Just want to know if your cystoscope showed any enlargement in the median lobe. Do you think exercise after PAE would delay improvement. Do you think frequent sex would delay improvement. I noticed that you have both the profound knowledge and the experience of going through PAE procedure and your contribution is so invaluable
Fouad
glenn77 333health
Posted
Sadly, I had a similar encounter. I mentioned PAE and my urologist claimed to have never heard of it. I briefly described what I knew of it, and a young female urologist who was with him to observe spoke up, and said she knew of it as it was being done in Boston where she was previously.
Unfortunately, I went ahead with Green Laser TURP and six months later, I have extreme/total incontinence still. ( After the GL procedure, he had to do a Gyrus TURP to clean up after the first.) I do kegels, core exercises, and use a stimulation device (via an anal prob) and nothing seems to make a difference.
My urologist refuses to discuss the AMS 800 artificial sphincter, say that it would mean that "we've failed." Every day I go through 6 to 8 heavy duty pads and Depends pull ups doesn't speak of success to me. The practice is apparently wanting me to wait at least a year before considering the AMS-800. A reference I found in a urology journal article in 1989 says that 99.5 percent of patients have partially or fully become incontinent. I wonder if data exist for the unhappy 0.5% as to what happens after two months? Is there a longitudinal study for this cohort?
glenn77
Posted
kenneth1955 glenn77
Posted
333health fj20848
Posted
Hi Fouad,
My doc said post procedure that I could exercise a week after it, although he said some recommend 2 weeks of waiting. He said don't use a bicycle for 6 weeks because of the pressure it puts on the prostate. I don't know about the frequent sex thing, it was not mentioned as part of the usual post PAE routine.
333health glenn77
Posted
Glenn, it's obviously your call on this, I just wonder why a physician denies moving forward when a procedure has not worked because of what seems an ego issue.
Neuromodulation has shown to be effective in severe incontinence. It's been half a year since your failed procedure. If it were me, I would want to work with a urologist, and soon, that would be looking forward to trying something else to help you. Best of luck, let us know
glenn77 333health
Posted
Thank you for making me aware of that option. I would think that among the 12 other urologists at my doctor's location, one of them will be aware of this. If not, there are three university teaching hospitals within an hour of where I live, and I know that one of them uses neuromodulation for pain control. Neuromodulation would, on the surface, seem a less invasive option than the AMS 800.
I wish I could find data from longitudinal studies for individuals who were significanlty incontintent two months post TURP, showing how many resolve at 4 months, 6 months, 8 months and so forth.