Questions for Dr Eastham Sloan Kettering Consult
Posted , 9 users are following.
Hi Thank You for all the wonderful comments helps me sort things out !
I have an appointment with Dr Eastham At Sloan Kettering this Monday I am told his robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy takes 4 Hours which is 2x the time my local Urologist said the same operation would take so I am hoping he is more thorough !! Wondering what other questions are important to ask ? I know he is Dept Chair so He does 4 operations a week . 2 Tuesdays 2 Thursdays Not sure if this surgeon is the right one for me Some Dept Heads are there for a reason better at Politics than surgery Any input is welcome . Thank You . Keith
I am 59 excellent physical shape my PSA . 4.6 . My Father had prostate cancer at 70 and had his prostrate removed and lived for many years after
I had 12 biopsies done on 6/5/18 . 8 out of 12 showed cancer involvement . Gleason 7
0 likes, 17 replies
mark_fastco sharpcut
Posted
RichardKen sharpcut
Posted
dennis63948 sharpcut
Posted
I did a great deal of reading and the side effects of each were of key importance. Have you considered them all? Even if you have a nerve saving prostatectomy, which is never a guaranteed operation, you may lose much or all of your impotence.
What I also was reminded about was that each specialist will guide you towards their own speciality, which they will feel is best for you.
Good luck but if I was you, I would read up a great deal more. Call Prostate Cancer UK or Cancer Research uk. You will get info about methods but its your decision, in the end.
Davey22 sharpcut
Posted
https://www.globalroboticsinstitute.com/
I had my surgery performed by Dr. Patel in celebration Fl.
Approx. 2 hours. This Doctor has done over 11,000 of these procedures.
sharpcut
Posted
BIOPSY REPORT FROM DR EPSTEIN . John Hopkins
I had 12 biopsies done on 6/5/18 . 8 out of 12 showed cancer involvement . Gleason 7
1.)Adenocarcinoma of Prostrate Gleason Score of 7 . (3+4) . involving 40 % of tissue
comment: Perineural Invasion is identified
Right Mid Needle Biopsy
2.) .
Adenocarcinoma of Prostrate Gleason Score of 6 . (3+3) . involving 50 % of tissue
comment 2 out of 4 cores involved by Tumor
High Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is also present . ??
Right Apex Needle Biopsy
3.)
Adenocarcinoma of Prostrate Gleason Score of 6 . (3+3) . involving 75 % of tissue
Left Base Needle Biopsy
4.)
Adenocarcinoma of Prostrate Gleason Score of 6 . (3+3) . involving less than 5 % of tissue
Left Mid
Adenocarcinoma of Prostrate Gleason Score of 6 . (3+3) . involving less than 5 % of tissue 2 out of 4 cores involved by Tumor
comment a rare atypical gland is seen in a third core . ??
Left Apex Needle Biopsy
6.)
Adenocarcinoma of Prostrate Gleason Score of 6 . (3+3) . involving 10 % of tissue
charles61038 sharpcut
Posted
dennis63948 sharpcut
Posted
Now I realise that you are in the States. I am in the UK so saw 2 different specialists (consultants). One was Radio therapy and the other a Surgeon. You have moderate grade and a treatment would be an option. I had choices even though it is the NHS, which as you may know, is available to all. I chose Proton therapy, which is only available privately, so is costly. It's more available in the USA. Anyway, that is what the Patient site is for. Quite rare to have surgery so early, or would be here.
Good luck!
sharpcut dennis63948
Posted
dennis63948 sharpcut
Posted
Hope it helps.
barney34567 sharpcut
Posted
Hmm. A troublesome PSA is one that doubles in a year or less.
Your annual PSA was 4.3 and 3 mths later is 4.6
Annually this is a rise 27%
Really another PSA reading is needed to determine the change in PSA.
"Cancers" < 3+4 are not worth bothering about.
The worry in your post is not the 3+4 but the mention of the PNI. This means cancer cells are at the extremity
of the prostate and may scoot away and cause problems in the future.
If I were you, if needed, I would consider surgery in favour of radiation or hormone treatment.
But I would wait for another PSA before going under the knife.
And if that PSA was south of 4.92, I would reconsider any treatment in the short term
because such a reading indicates the cancer is climbing at a rate of <27%
MikeTango sharpcut
Posted
One course of action is to telephone around and ask for peoples’ comments. If you ask politely many will tell you over the phone things they would not say in an email.
Have you tried calling Prostate Cancer UK and other charities?
May I ask what made you decide to go for prostate removal instead of various treatments available?
I may be facing the same situation and I would be grateful to learn from your experiences.
sharpcut MikeTango
Posted
Thank you . Keith
MikeTango sharpcut
Posted
hi Sharpcut
Sorry for late reply. Best to seek and obtain widest advice for your specific condition. i heard one leading surgeon say if i had attended certain NHS hospitals they would have recommended i have my prostate removed whereas my London based private urologist surgeons advised that my prostate cancer with Gleeson score of 3+4 is local and contained in the prostate and is highly amenable to HIFU ie high frequency ultrasound treatment which i will have next month
So research and seeking widest opinions is always a good thing despite the temptation to not want to hear too much about it all Best of luck. Mike
RichardKen MikeTango
Posted
I agree Mike. I had hormone treatment followed by four weeks of RT treatment. for a Gleason score of 7. two years ago. Psa has been stable at atmost zero at each test. When I was diagnosed with prostrate cancer my immediate reaction was to have the prostrate removed but at age 75 this was not considered to be the best solution. Surgery comes with its own risks of course such as the likely problem of getting erections later on.
Cheers Richard
barney34567 sharpcut
Posted
Have you made a decision?
Any news to share?