Restrictions after Minimally invasive THR by Anterior Approach

Posted , 12 users are following.

I am still undecided and scared. Following lots of research I am given to understand that recovery after THR by the Anterior Approach is less restrictive,ie the 90 degree rule does not apply and risk of dislocation is lower.

Please does anyone have experience of the Anterior Approach,and can you offer any comments ?

I am terrified not only of the op. but of undoing the good work by my clumsy and awkward  movements afterwards. Living alone and being old (79 years), and accident prone, I am keen to make the most sensible choices.

I have been following the forum for ages and have learned a great deal from the many hippy contributors. Thank you all for your open and generous contributions and many thanks for any answers to this post.

Love and warm regards to all of you

Joy x

1 like, 24 replies

24 Replies

Next
  • Posted

    Gloria, I to wanted the anterior approach for the same reasons you listed. My Dr. Talked me into a lateral approach mainly because of my height. I'm only 5'2 and have short thighs. He said he would do the anterior if I insisted, but he would have more room to work if he did a lateral. Which is down the side of your thigh. Basically it's the same as anterior, no restrictions, no rules to follow. I have had no problems. So talk with your surgeon because everyone is different. You can watch the procedure on you tube. If you are inclined to watch that kinda thing. I found it fasinating!!
  • Posted

    I have just scheduled a THR and have decided on Posterior approach after a long conversation with my brother who is an orthopedic surgeon and my own surgeon. I also read an article in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Despite great claims to the contrary, the study the journal cited (sample size 100 pts) showed longer surgical time (resulting in increased blood loss and time under anesthesia) and higher pain afterward with anterior. My brother said there is also an x-ray machine in the OR with anterior and a tech along with that which in his opinion increased infection risk. He also told me it is not a "new" approach but was called something else 45 years ago. (He is 60 and has been practicing 35 years.) The heavy marketing in the states may be to cover the cost of the operating tables for anterior because they are over $100,000.

    Having said all this and feeling solid in my own choice, I have two friends who had hips done with anterior approach and they seem to be flourishing and very pleased with the results. Choose your surgeon carefully and go with what seems to make sense to you after doing your research. Best wishes.

    • Posted

      I am relieved to see your comments as some of what you are saying echoes my 'research'. I had a posterior replacement as a 'youngster', (about 52,) 12 years ago and the outcome was really pleasing although as we know the restrictions for the first 6 weeks are frustrating.

      I have been languishing with the other hip needing to be done. An operation delayed 12 months through under insurance. Having moved cities (in Australia) I needed to find a new surgeon and the person recommended comes with very high credentials. However he (aged mid 50s) does posterior ONLY and has been very strong in his criticism of the anterior which I would prefer because of the seemingly less restrictive post-operative period.

      Like Gail I also have an older former orthopaedic surgeon brother who has recommended posterior (as has my young GP and my older GP brother) but I do wonder whether the reason these older men prefer the traditional approach is in part because that it what they were trained in?

      On the other hand, I have read copiously on both side of the debate and my lingering doubts re anterior include:

      . is the approach ultimately as durable as the posterior outcome?

      . does a shorter stem potentially shorten the prosthesis fit?

      . the risks of femoral nerve damage?

      I would really appreciate any comments and thoughts from others about these issues thanks.

      Ynlike Gail i am still in the wilderness decision making period and am going to see a local anterior person this coming week to add to my confusion.

      Thanks in anticipation Eliz

    • Posted

      Hi Eliz what state do you reside in. I am from Sydney my name is Mark I had the new method of surgery and can't talk highly enough about it. My surgeon was Dr Sol Qurashi and he pioneered the method here in Sydney about 4 or so years ago. I won't go into all the details except to say I have had no problems whatsoever and it is coming up to 12 mths.

      If you research him you will hopefully resolve a lot of your issues.

      All the best

      Mark

    • Posted

      My brother is trained in Anterior as well as posterior but is not a quick one to jump on the band wagon as he monitors long-range outcomes.He has stayed up with the literature and when the excitement settles down, at 8 wks post op, both outcomes seem identical. Durability with anterior is an unanswered question although there is no reason to suspect problems, the data is just not there yet.  He did speak about greater risk to nerves but in honesty, it didn't register too much. I was feeling pretty overwhelmed at that point. There are some "older" surgeons in my city doing anterior. I had an appt with one but after looking at the current lit, settled on posterior. It is so hard taking responsibility for all this. Wearying to deal with it on top of the pain. Good luck to you.
    • Posted

      Many thanks mark

      I had first hip done years ago in Syd but now in Adelaide. Am booked for posterior in 6 weeks but also going to see a young bloke whi is doing anterior on Wednesday.

    • Posted

      Thanks Gail. Your situation sounds remarkably similar to mine in terms of agonising over the approach. I recall the limitations after my first hip and would obviously love to avoid or dominish them this time but as you say the data just isn't there yet about the long term durability of the anterior outcome. On the other hand i ask myself why surgeons who have been highly reputed for their work (such as my former bloke in Sydney) would have switched to another method (he is now 70% anterior) unless they had long term faith in it as they would not want to be associated with something that was suspect. 
    • Posted

      Hi Aussie Liz

      i thunk you revealed the dilemma with the use of the word faith - its faith in advance of statistics. Lots of well meaning experienced surgeons used resurfacing for women as a safer less invasive solution and this has had disastrous consequences for so many that its use has shrunk in recent years. Feeling better 3 weeks sooner is nothing really -against a record of traditional hips that have shown to last 20& years. We have to play the long ball game on this procedure. In 50 years time this whole approach to hips will appear to be barbaric, hopefully - too late for us lot of crocks

      cheers

      chris

  • Posted

    Hi Gloria!

    I am 56 and had the lateral approach 7 months ago. I had no restrictions although I took it easy for a month or so. I still have a slight limp which seems to develop after walking for any length of time. I still have some pain from the surgery but nothing like the bone on bone pain I had with my OA. I need to have the other hip done as well and will most definitely have the lateral approach again.

    It wasn't as bad as I had expected.

    Good luck to you!

    • Posted

      Dear Miele

      Could you please explain the lateral approach.Is that Posterior or Anterior?

      Do you mind telling me where you are located? Also the name of your surgeon?

      I am trying to establish in my own mind where in the country (I am in the UK) is the best location for the chance of an Anterior specialist.

      Thank you so much for your reply to my post. All responses to my anxious enquiries are so helpful!

      Best wishes to you and all the best for the second THR.

      Love from

      Joyx

  • Posted

    I had a posterior approach due to a previous knee replacement. The restrictions just required extra planning but weren't really a problem. It would be very difficult to dislocate the hip as it hurts whenever you go close to 90 degrees. Ultimately you may not have a choice because some people aren't suitable for the anterior approach.
    • Posted

      Thanks. Hadn't seen this comment saying you had posterior when I responded to your private message.

      I am interested in why, or why not, peoples' choice re posterior versus anterior particularly re longevity and nerve damage risk.

    • Posted

      I would choose posterior every time because as a previous poster said a few weeks of convenience of anterior doesn't match up to a the long term proven outcome of posterior.

      And one of my life mottos is 'Live so you don't have regrets'. The regret of a poor outcome with an anterior approach is not something I would want to bear for the rest of my life.

  • Posted

    Hi Gloria, 

    I didn't know about the different approaches to THR surgery and had posterior 

    in March 2015 on right hip - Unfortunately left hip needed to be replaced and when I asked about anterior my surgein told me he preferred the posterior approach for me ... 

    have you discussed this with your surgeon? 

    good luck and let us know what decision you'll make -

    welcome to our hippies family - the most supportive, funniest and \loving friend you can have -

    big warm hug

    renee

     

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.