Restrictions after Minimally invasive THR by Anterior Approach
Posted , 12 users are following.
I am still undecided and scared. Following lots of research I am given to understand that recovery after THR by the Anterior Approach is less restrictive,ie the 90 degree rule does not apply and risk of dislocation is lower.
Please does anyone have experience of the Anterior Approach,and can you offer any comments ?
I am terrified not only of the op. but of undoing the good work by my clumsy and awkward movements afterwards. Living alone and being old (79 years), and accident prone, I am keen to make the most sensible choices.
I have been following the forum for ages and have learned a great deal from the many hippy contributors. Thank you all for your open and generous contributions and many thanks for any answers to this post.
Love and warm regards to all of you
Joy x
1 like, 24 replies
christine2107 gloriajoy
Posted
Many surgeons prefer posterior because they can see better and get a better fit. The restrictions are for 6 weeks ans should not be the key decider as you can plan ahead for those - i have had 2 posterior thrs. So putting aside the restrictions its about you having the best surgery outcome in the longer term - that is my advice on what to focus on. Many hippoes have different health issues as well as hip problems, we are different ages and heights and weights.
So you will get a wide range of advice from such a widely experienced group and its not possibly to average out the response to get a good avearge answer.
Perhaps ask the surgeon "if i was your mum - what would you advise for me -to give me the best long term outcome and lowest surgical risk?" Asked these questions surgeons cant help be flipped into giving a considered response.
Good luck with whatever path you take and once taken - dont over think the decision or worry about it. Promise? I know what overthinking does to my peace of mind ;-)
Chris
renee01952 christine2107
Posted
good question - it reminds me of my mechanic (in L.A.) whom I asked the same question regarding a big repair on my car - except I asked him: would you have your wife drive my car ? he responded : My wife yes, my mother no ....
(sorry )
christine2107 renee01952
Posted
v funny!
the CT scan operator at our hospital reckoned it was so dodgy the only person he would allow in it was his mother in law! This was told me by a consultant as we booked me a scan elsewhere. CT machine since been replaced
alice85142 gloriajoy
Posted
Big Smiles
ALi 2
Loral gloriajoy
Posted
Mine was also uncemented, and incision was glued shut. I used a wheeled walker for about a week then a cane for about 3 weeks. Had PT at home and outpatient. I'm fine, only have a bit of a problem kneeling to the floor.
cathie38426 gloriajoy
Posted
THR 5 weeks ago. I had the lateral incision, uncemented,
both times. I had GA for the first op and spinal and was
awake for the second.I could see the clock and the actual
surgery time was 1 hr and three quarters.
Independence is one thing, but taking all support available
is paramount. Have you been offered alternatives? Most surgeons
have their set preferences, only adapted to the patient's age and
medical history.
You are right to be fearful, we all were, but we had the op because
we had to, and we came out the other side glad we'd had it.
Regarding our age, it will surprise and please you to hear that
we oldies do well.. We don't rush our recovery, we are realistic
about the results, we do as we are told, and,as children who grew
up in wartime, it is appropriate to say on Remembrance Day,
we just get on with it.
ask me whatever,
love Cathie
gloriajoy cathie38426
Posted
Thank you for your encouraging post. Could you please explain the advantage of a lateral incision and how does it differ from alternative options?
Was your op.Posterior or Anterior? So many aspects of this surgery and so much jargon, I am struggling to make sense of what the options are!
I am pleased to see that you had an uncemented hip despite being quite a senior lady!
What I have read implied that cemented is usually preferred for older patients.The implication being that they will not outlive the HR. I have the feeling that assumptions are made that the older patient will (A) be less active and will (B) not need a revision in their lifetime.
Since I lead a very active and independent life,with every intention of living for a great deal longer and at the same pace of activity I am keen that such assumptions will not be applied to my case.
Could you please tell me where you are located and the name of your surgeon?
I agree that all available support should be accepted gladly,and of course one advantage of being older is the there is no necessity to rush back to work. Being retired we can pace our recovery to suit our needs.
There are not too many advantages to getting old but there are a few!
I hope you are doing well,5 weeks is quite early but the tone of your post is so positive I assume all is good for you.
Thank you again
Love Joy
gloriajoy cathie38426
Posted
Don't know why my post is being moderated.
Have not written anything offensive.
Hope it will be feed up soon.
gloriajoy
Posted