Sharp groin pain

Posted , 10 users are following.

Hi Everyone,

For those of you that have hip arthritis did any of you have intermittent sharp pain in the groin? It is not constant, which makes it worse because you just don't know when it's going to happen...

1 like, 34 replies

34 Replies

Prev Next
  • Posted

    Hi, sorry your experiencing the pain I also have. Have you had an MRI recently? Sounds like it's definitely your hip but also could be a labral tear. My pain also is annoyingly in my groin, back and anterior thigh (snapping hip)  and I need a THR ASAP. I would ice and use heat intermittently and let your doctor know that you have this pain. Your not alone and good luck getting a proper diagnosis. 

  • Posted

    Yes, it started 8 years ago. Went to the best hip surgeons in NYC who essentially told me to wait until age 65 because the THR may only last 10-15 years when you are younger. The second surgery to replace the first THR doesn't always go that well. In fact I met a man, waiting for my MRI and he had his first THR 12 years earlier, and it wore out already! One of the best ranked hospitals for hip surgery in the US. You need to rest and get off the hip periodically through out the day, and do stretches and try to maintain range of motion. Also try to maintain muscle mass. If you are limping, you have been standing on it too long. Try going to a hip arthroscopy surgeon, who may be able to fix some things if you are not too far along, and delay major surgery. My hip was too advanced for this procedure to be of any benefit. Good luck. 

  • Posted

    Yes. Intermittent pain is very good news! 

    In my case, my 'classic' case of hip OA was 100% caused by muscle imbalance. When the muscle imbalance was corrected all symptoms were gone completely. The bad news is that the imbalance is hard to correct, but at least it's something you can work on yourself so no financial outlay.

    I have helped lots of other people to correct the imbalances associated with hip OA and it's apparent that there are two basic patterns of muscle imbalance associated with EVERY hip OA case that I have come across. 

    Either way, chances are that the groin pain is largely due to the fact that the psoas and iliacus are 'lazy' on the symptomatic side. This pulls the sacrum to one side and causes hip flexors and adductors to try and compensate for the lazy support muscles. Your body will find all sorts of different ways to compensate and this is why pain tends to shift from groin, lateral thigh, outer hip and glutes. You feel the pain at the point where the soft tissue is currently taking most of the strain.

    For symptomatic relief you could try self-massage. Poke around with your fingers (whilst in a seated position) along the crease of your groin - move either side of the crease to pelvis and leg. Can you find any sore spots? If so, press hard or gently massage - it'll hurt but it should release the muscle and free things up. The psoas/iliacus can be hard to get at. Place a lacrosse ball on a small pile of books then lie face down so that your groin area is over the ball - let your weight sink into it. Shift around so that you're applying pressure over the whole groin area - you need to explore and try different angles to find the 'knot'. 

    Ultimately though, you won't eliminate this until you address the imbalance. Essentially all the major muscles in your body are out of balance - so the muscles on one sider are dominant over the muscles on the other side and this causes your whole pelvis and spine to twist. Your hip is just the 'victim' - the innocent bystander that is getting damaged. 

    I hope this helps! 

    (Stretching the hip flexors on the good side can also be a big help - look up couch stretch).

     

    • Posted

      Hi Susan, I understand what you are saying here but how can you be sure the pain it is muscular and not coming from the joint? I also have hip impingement too. Yes I agree the intermittent pain is a bit strange..could you explain further?
    • Posted

      Honestly, everyone is different. I too have CAM impingement and OA of the hip, and after 6 weeks of physical therapy to address a titled pelvis, my muscles were getting stronger but for me it is by no means a "cure all" and didn't make the pain go away.  And as far as some of the other responses saying the hip replacement won't last, the average time is about 20 years.  They have come a long way.  Personally, I would rather live 20 years pain free and have to go through it again when I'm older, than force myself to wait it out and live in pain for the next 15 years. Just me though.  People have a lot of good advice, but I think only a doctor can help you through x-rays and an MRI and a good orthopedic surgeon. Then you will have your answers.

    • Posted

      Let me try answering your question this way...

      There are (at least) two possibilities:

      1. The pain is coming from a diseased or badly damaged joint.

      2. The pain is a result of muscle imbalance.

      FACT: It is IMPOSSIBLE to tell which. Research has proven that MRI/x-ray is not helpful and there is no diagnositic test.

      Possibility one is not curable and your best chance of relief is likely to be toxic drugs or surgery, with no guarantees of success.

      Possibility two IS curable, and even if it turns out that the cause of your symptoms IS joint damage/disease treating the muscle imbalance can only help. 

      Which option makes sense to you? Taking the mainstream/doctor's approach of assuming the worst and trying the damaging/dangerous treatment first? OR doing what research has proven to be the best treatment for OA (no matter what the root cause) and use exercise. EXCEPT rather than blindly guessing at WHAT exercise (which is what doctors and physios do), make the effort to understand the nature of the muscle imbalance and choose your exercise wisely.

      Short version: you don't know that the pain is muscular; the only way to find out either way is to treat the muscle imbalance (which I guarantee you have) and see what, if anything, remains.

      Go into my profile and you'll find a link to a website. Have a look there and by all means contact me if you have any questions. It's not an easy thing to do, but I and others have proven that it CAN be done if you work at it.

      My recommendations to check for trigger points/knots in the muscles can give you some clue as to where the pain is coming from. If massage relieves the pain then that pretty much tells you the pain is coming from the muscles.

    • Posted

      Hi Susan, Thank you for your explanation, I have xrays booked for Monday also
    • Posted

      Just remember that research shows that x-rays don't help to diagnose OA. At best they can be used to rule out other things. Here in the UK at least, the guidelines (based upon ALL available research from around the world) advise AGAINST using x-rays in diagnosis and treatment of OA. 

      The main reason for this is that it's known there is no correlation between symptoms and findings on film. Most people that have 'evidence' of OA on xray are symptom free (so why aren't you?). Additionally, some people with no evidence of OA on film have bad symptoms and some with devastating wear to joints have mild or no symptoms. 

      Research also shows that x-rays/mri make no difference to outcome. 

      The downside is that often a doctor will spot something on xray and say 'oh look - there's some wear. That's why you have pain. Take some drugs and come back when you need surgery'. Instead of trying to figure out WHY you have the pain and, as in my case, perhaps curing it completely without toxic drugs and surgery.

      Just keep these things in mind when you talk to your doctor. If you want links to the research I'm happy to provide. Go to your doctor armed with the facts!

    • Posted

      I think the x-rays are a good idea.  For me, that was the most helpful tool for the doctors to show me the joint damage.  Two opinions from reputable orthopedic doctors showed the exact same thing.  This is from the UK Arthritis Research website:

      "X-rays – X-rays are the most useful test to confirm osteoarthritis, although you probably won’t need one. They may show changes such as bony spurs or narrowing of the space between your bones. They’ll also show whether any calcium has settled in your joint."

      https://www.arthritisresearchuk.org/arthritis-information/conditions/osteoarthritis/diagnosis.aspx

       

    • Posted

      That is misleading to the point of being incorrect. 

      The NICE guidelines identify two distinct types of osteoarthritis:

      1. Radiographic Osteoartyhritis

      2. Symptomatic Osteoarthritis

      Most people that have radiographic osteoarthritis don't have any symptoms. It is now considered to be a normal and benign condition. Whereas it was once thought that it was disease of wear and tear, it's now considered wear and REPAIR. Most people have radiographic OA somewhere in their body and it never causes any problems. Just the bodies normal repair process.

      It's only symptomatic OA that we need to worry about. the NICE guidelines (which look at ALL available research) have found that there is no benefit in getting x-rays to help with the diagnosis of OA. In fact, they claim there is no test for OA - it is a diagnosis of exclusion (can only be diagnosed by ruling out all else). Their detailed look at available research showed the x-rays don't help with diagnosis (other than perhaps to rule out something else) and they don't help with treatment.

      The big danger of x-rays is that when a doctor tells you that you have evidence of OA on an x-ray you panic and it's likely to make you worse (nocebo effect). It also gives the doctor a cop-out - he can give you a diagnosis of an incurable disease and he doesn't have to find out what is really causing your symptoms. 

      If you get an x-ray and it shows degenerative changes (radiographic OA) how do you know whether those degenerative changes are connected to your symptoms? Remember, most people with radiographic OA are symptom free.

      Don't take my word for it. Read the NICE guidelines for yourself. Unlike the charity website that provides dumbed down info that simply isn't accurate, the NICE guidelines provide detailed info and links to the actual research studies. The NICE guidelines are the guidance that your doctor should be looking at and basing his decisions upon. 

      https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg177/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-191761311

    • Posted

      Thank you for the information but I am going to have to respectfully disagree and trust the valued opinions of three different physicians and the extensive research that I have done myself. I had the symptoms first and the X-rays only confirmed the OA diagnosis and I am happy it can be treated, as exercise, physical therapy and medicine will do nothing for you if you have bone spurs. That’s all I am saying from a personal stand point. I have no other alternatives and I am respectful of everyone’s decision on how they manage their pain and I will never try to discourage anyone from going to the doctor for answers. Then it is up to you to decide what to do with that information, but to say it’s worthless is in and of itself untrue.
    • Posted

      Kelly - absolutely ! Everyone should do as they see fit. I'm simply sharing official guidelines - the evidence based info that doctors are recommended to follow (in the UK at least).

      It proved to be a life-saver for me. I know that many others feel liberated when they get hold of this info - it gives them the confidence to fight the condition rather than just accept it. It is as you say a personal choice though - if the info is made accessible to all then we can each choose to ignore it if we wish.Some want the simple info from the doc - others want the full facts.

      https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg177/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-191761311

    • Posted

      p.s. I had (have - i'm sure they're still there) bone spurs. Many docs/physios jumped to the conclusion that they were the cause of my symptoms; they were wrong! Once the imbalance (primarily a core imbalance - the hip is just the 'victim'wink was corrected all symptoms disappeared. 

      I was originally diagnosed with 'classic hip OA', but over the years it spread to feet, back, neck, shoulders. Every single symptom turned out to be caused by this imbalance - all joints were being strained as a result of core muscles not working correctly. 

    • Posted

      Hi Susan, I can to a point see where you are coming from, I know there is no correlation between pain and damage, my very wise GP has already explained this to me. I also know that over the age of 50 most people will show some degenerative changes in their joints...that happened with my knee, came back showing mild arthritis changes about 5 years ago...A very good MSK Physio explained this is going to happen in most people of a certain age. 
  • Posted

    Yes, I occasionally get groin pain.  Unfortunately, I am 69, and my surgery has not sent me for any Xrays.  I originally thought it was lumbar pain, rather than hip pain, but it never was looked into properly although I first had pain in that area when I was in my 40s or 50s.  I was just referred to a pain clinic where I was shown exercises to help with the pain.  Now I am older, it is worse, and no joy with any help.  Looks like I'm past my sell by date as far as my surgery is concerned.

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.