Sore under foreskin
Posted , 5 users are following.
We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.
ron_08501
Posted
Photos to follow.
ron_08501
Posted
ml66uk ron_08501
Posted
ron_08501 ml66uk
Posted
Looking back I had been using a Savalon cream
which is white. I wondered if that was why the foreskin was white?
Swelling of foreskin is a lot better..
thanks for for the comment.
ron_08501 ml66uk
Posted
Doctor hasn't seen it.
will go to him on 10th.
ron_08501
Posted
Think I might still need the 'snip' though.
will update this thread next week.
Pepasan ron_08501
Edited
Pepasan
Posted
Have you worked out why you tend to have this problem? Maybe you just need to be more thorough with washing, use moisturiser daily or use lube for self-pleasuring.
ron_08501 Pepasan
Posted
ron_08501 Pepasan
Posted
Yes, the probable cause is not being thorough enough in washing ..... advice is to wash underneath foreskin every day....,
Apparently numbers of men with this condition is high.
ron_08501
Posted
Put it on You Tube.
ron_08501
Edited
my penis has a short section where the skin is snagged to the head.
Can I get that removed (cut) so it the same as the other side which is normal.
(Sorry about pics, not easy to phototograph yourself).
ml66uk ron_08501
Posted
That's a fairly significant adhesion. Surgery would be possible, and I suspect it should have happened years ago as it may have contributed to the BXO, but there's a chance you may need a circumcision now anyway. You'll have to see what a urologist says, but in your position, I'd want the least invasive surgery possible, even if it meant risking further surgery later. Your foreskin still looks very swollen though, so circumcision may be the only option though.
If you haven't already seen a urologist, I suspect your GP will refer you to one when you see him on Thursday.
ron_08501 ml66uk
Posted
Thanks for the quick reply.
having searched the web I too thought
it was an 'adhension.'
Last tab this week then I'll make an appointment
for GP.
Penis not causing any problems re water etc
but having a few sleepless nights with wondering
how long the waiting list will be.
Currently 40 days for a euroligist.
-----
Pepasan ron_08501
Posted
I hadn't realised yu had adhesion as well. Has it always been like that? If so, what would the rationale for circumcision? Maybe you could live with the partial foreskin retraction. At least you would retain the pleasure nerve endings rather than risk the surgery removing vital skin. As long as you keep clean, there's no reasom in my view that the infection would recur.
ron_08501 Pepasan
Posted
First appeared in 2015.
i saw a doctor who put me a steroid cream 0.5.
it didn't change, didn't cause any problem re erections, passing water etc
i decided to go back the other week. That doctor diagnosed BXO but that was
only looking at it. I'm not sure that is right now. Think you need a blood test to confirm BXO.
A partial circumcision would be better than a full one.
That adhension has never moved since 2015.
i read a piece on the net today written by a UK euroligist.
he was saying Adhensions can be removed in an office
procedure and simply cut.
not requiring a full operation.
ron_08501 Pepasan
Posted
ml66uk ron_08501
Posted
I assumed it had always been there. It doesn't look like a regular adhesion, so it may not be as straightforward to fix it. I hope you can see a urologist soon.
ron_08501 ml66uk
Posted
may go private to get the initial
appointment earlier.
have to to see my GP next week or later this week.