Stinging nettle root extract.

Posted , 9 users are following.

Hi all,

Just been reading up on this and wondered if any of you have tried this in an attempt to alleviate your symptoms of BPH.

If so I would be interested in hearing whether you found any benefit from taking it and, if so, how long it took to see any positive effects.

In particular I was thinking of trying, if I can get hold of it in the UK, a particular 'blend' of stinging nettle root extract and saw palmetto which seems to get good reviews when googling it.

It goes under three brand names: prostagutt forte, prostactive plus and prostol.

Has anyone tried any of these?

1 like, 26 replies

26 Replies

Prev
  • Posted

    Neither Stinging Nettle Root Extract nor Saw Palmetto Oil are claimed to reduce the size of the prostate. They do reduce the symptoms though.
    • Posted

      Anything that helps is good in my books, I'm going for surgery this Friday, so will be back online once I'm able to and keep you informed on my recovery. Send good Karma to the surgeon who will be doing my surgery.

      Thanks

      Mike

    • Posted

      It may be a little late, but check out PAE and Urolift, before you have a Turp. A TURP can have awful, irreversible side effects .

      Neal

    • Posted

      Hi Neal

      Thanks for the advice but my TURP is a go. I will  have to deal with the outcome and a specialist told me that it still remains the "gold standard", I will take his word on that, and thousands have been done and continue to be done. I'm 69 and not going to father any children at this point in my life so that aspect is not a bother to me at all. My concern is growth, prostate's grow like weeds, I do not want to be completely blocked off so I will go with 'resizing' now and will hope for the best the older I get. All the best.

      Mike

    • Posted

      Large review: TURP still gold standard for BPHMay 20, 2012Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard for treating BPH, a review of Medicare claims data showed.

      Encompassing outcomes with more than 600,000 procedures, the results showed that complications occur slightly more often with TURP, but approximately 20% of patients require follow-up surgery (usually TURP) after transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), laser vaporization, and laser coagulation.

      "It’s nothing new to learn that the complication rate is higher with TURP, although not much higher than with the other procedures," said first author Sean Elliott, MD, of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. “On the other hand, the re-operation rate is dramatically lower with TURP.

      "Even though TURP might be declining in frequency as the primary procedure, it still seems to be the go-to procedure for primary treatment failure," he added. "I think that probably emphasizes the fact that everyone, regardless of what they use as primary therapy, still recognizes TURP as the gold standard."

      To examine the comparative effectiveness of procedures for BPH, the authors reviewed 100% Medicare files for the years 2001 through 2007, identifying 624,319 men who had TURP, TUNA, TUMT, or one of the laser procedures. TURP accounted for 52.3% of all the procedures, and follow-up averaged 3.6 years.

      The most common postoperative complication was urethral stricture, occurring in 4.4% of patients overall, including 5.7% of TURP procedures, 2.3% of TUMT procedures, and 2.6% of TUNA procedures (pp

      The 5-year estimated incidence of repeat BPH surgery ranged from 8.3% with TURP to 25.8% after TUMT. After adjusting for patient and hospital factors, retreatment was 2.1 to 3.5 times more likely with laser vaporization or TUMT, respectively, than with TURP.

      Go back to this edition of Urology Times Conference Brief.

       

    • Posted

      All that data ignore PAE and Urolift. They also don't talk about the other possible complications, such as impotence, incontinence , and retrograde ejaculation. This was done by urologists, who make a lot of money on TURP.

      Neal

    • Posted

      Yes very best of luck MIke, Did you say you were in London?

      I am in Cambridgeshire and long story short have BPH with 2 episodes of AUR. Been offered GL Laser to blast away part of the offending gland. Now considering my options. Im 53 and Prostate volume I think 48cc.

      Let us know how you get on on Friday.

      Jez

    • Posted

      Hello Jez , I'm in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. You certainly have options and we are both close to 50cc. I was told that it is time to get this 'fixed', so that will happen this Friday. There is no mention of the GL Laser over here, it seems to be the TURP that is most frequently done.  Neal certainly has a point as well, in talking about complications, but I suppose none of the procedures are 100% accurate either. I guess you just have to go with your best gut feeling and listen to the advice given on here, there is alot of experience.

      I'll keep you posted.

      Mike

    • Posted

      Hi Neal, there must be alot of money to be made by urologists, and more and more techniques are being developed. Alot of factors to be considered as well, overall health, weight, size of prostate, age, etc. I'm sure they all come into play in recovery time. One size does not fit all, all I know is that I have to have confidence in the man at the end of the scope that is "re-sizing" me.

      Mike

       

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.