Supplements
Posted , 10 users are following.
Does any take Residronate (Actonel)? If so could you share your experiences? Thanks a lot!
1 like, 39 replies
Posted , 10 users are following.
Does any take Residronate (Actonel)? If so could you share your experiences? Thanks a lot!
1 like, 39 replies
We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.
EileenH Cyn1965
Posted
Reading the posts above, can I just make it very clear that the "don't" with regard to taking bisphosphonates on any of the PMR/GCA forums relates to "unless it is shown you need them", i.e. that you have had a dexascan which shows you are in the osteoporosis range. It is the automatic writing of a prescription at the same time as the pred for omeprazole and everything else they allege are "essential" that is to be seen as questionable.
If you have a dexascan at the time you start pred you will know whether it is pred that causes any loss of bone density. Clearly there are many people who have it anyway. Anyone who has been in PPIs for any length of time is at an even higher risk of developing osteoporosis - but they don't hand out bisphosphonates when they tell patients to take PPIs.
But they must be used properly - and that means having calcium and vit D levels checked at the same time as they start them. If the calcium and vit D levels aren't right - all the bisphosphonate in the world won't increase bone density.
sandy08116 EileenH
Posted
I was told that once off prednisone, I'd be off Fosamax as well.
Reeceregan EileenH
Posted
EileenH sandy08116
Posted
Depends doesn't it? If your bone density is still low they will want you to keep on it probably.
Anhaga Reeceregan
Posted
Do you get adequate magnesium and are you taking Vitamin K2? These should direct calcium into the bones rather than having it floating around in your blood vessels to settle where it's not wanted.
EileenH Reeceregan
Posted
If your calcium levels are high then I hope they are looking as to why. It MAY be the supplements - but it could be something else. Google "hypercalcemia symptoms and causes Mayo clinic" and have a look at their page.
If you stop the supplements and the calcium level continues to rise - it could be a parathyroid problem. In which case they shouldn't JUST stick you on Prolia. If you have a parathyroid problem then your blood calcium levels will rise at the expense of your bones - and you develop osteoporosis. So they do need to rule that out before you start Prolia.
Prolia traps the calcium into the bones and increases the formation of new bone, and hence the density.
Reeceregan Anhaga
Posted
Reeceregan EileenH
Posted
Anhaga Reeceregan
Posted
For what it's worth the Italians have done some research on coffee and fatty liver. What they've found is that the equivalent of about five espressos a day (and it can be decaffeinated) has a measurable effect on the liver and can lead to returning fatty liver to normal. I don't know if there would be other factors involved for individual patients with other problems.
Reeceregan Anhaga
Posted
Wow, I didn’t know that. I am only a one cup in the morning type of gal, with the occasional chai late when I’m out. I actually reduced my coffee intake once I started my anti inflammatory diet. 😏
sandy08116 Anhaga
Posted
Anhaga Reeceregan
Posted
EileenH Reeceregan
Posted
I've already said it haven't I: I'd like to know your vit D and calcium treand. I'd want my pituitary function checked...
Reeceregan EileenH
Posted
Hope this is Ok to post here, and makes sense to you. Not sure how else to do it.
Ca: Oct 2017 - 2.64 , Jan 2018- 2.73
Corr Ca: Oct 2017 - 2.56, Jan 2018-2.65
Urea: Oct 2017 - 8.6, Jan 2018 - 9.3
?ALT: Jan 2016 - 78, ( I had major sinus infection), Aug 2017 - 43, Oct 2017 -33, Nov 2017 - 77,Jan 2018 - 32
?AST: Jan 2016 - 78, ( " " "
?GGT: Jan 2016 -82, ( " " " ), Aug 2017 -43, Oct 2017- 46, Nov 2017 -77, Jan 2018 -62
Chol: Oct 2017 -6.4, Jan 2018 -5.7
WCC: Aug 2017 - 15.3, Nov 2017 - 14.1
WBC: Oct 017 - 11.5
?Neutrophils: Aug 2017 - 14.6, Oct 2017 - 10.5, Nov 2017 12.49
Lymphocytes: Aug 2018 - .64, Oct 2017 - .8
?Plat: Oct 2017 - 404
?These are just the ones that were outside the normal range and marked in red, though the recommendation from pathologist to rheumy was "No Action" every time. I'm not sure what the code for Vit D is on the test, but if it was tested it must always be in the normal range as nothing else was outside it.
?
EileenH Reeceregan
Posted
I think most of those would be increased by being on pred - but I would want to know why they thought that calcium level was OK. 2.5 mmol per litre is usually considered top of the range and recommended is 2.25.
Google "causes of raised calcium levels" and look at the parathyroid website - and then ask your doctor why they haven't checked your parathyroid hormone level and what your vit D level is - the number, not just "normal".
Reeceregan EileenH
Posted
I’ll do that. Thank you. And the odd thing is, those calcium tests have only been requested twice, since being on pred, all the others are repeated every time. And as I said before, to have the t score of -4 really threw me. Here I was told early Decemeber to increase my calcium intake via diet and supplements yet it doesn’t look like I needed to. 🤔
ptolemy EileenH
Posted
EileenH ptolemy
Posted
Every lab will be slightly different but Reece's lab classed them as high - and the second is higher than the first. It is that and the severe level of osteoporosis that is what concerns me. I'm sure it will turn out to be OK - but better safe than sorry I always feel. So many doctors don't "get" the parathyroid thing and it is so easily missed.
Reeceregan EileenH
Posted
EileenH Reeceregan
Posted
Heck - NO!!!
Ah - right, corr ca will be corrected calcium: "Many laboratories report corrected calcium or Ca (corr) which is just total calcium adjusted to compensate for abnormally high or low levels of albumin in the blood which can cause the total calcium level to appear falsely high or low."
Doesn't vit D appear as vit D? Or maybe 25-hydroxyvitamin D and/or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D???
Reeceregan EileenH
Posted
On the test taken August 2017 ( 3 months after pred) I can see that he requested Vit D's, and the result is 51, units nmol/L, reference (50-140). Comment is "consistent with Vit D adequacy."
Looks only just above the low range to me, but it was coming out of winter and I had had a rugged few cold months in the middle with the extreme symptoms of PMR/GCA from January to end of May when it was diagnosed. Then it goes on further to say a generalized "Vit D adequacy can be defined as a level >49 nmol/L at the end of winter - the level may need to be 10 -20 nmol/L higher at the end of summer to allow for seasonal changes."
The test in Oct 2017 was taken by a different pathology lab, and the rheumy requested GLU, ESR, CRP, MBA , LIP and FBE. I can't see anything on any of the pages of results that pertain to Vit D, unlike the previous test that had a separate result for Vit D quite plainly. That month my Ca was 2.64, Corr Ca was 2.56. If he tested for D, would it be under FBE, Lip, or MBA, or even Plat? It had a slightly raised level with a comment of Neutrophilia present.
Nov 2017 requested tests: LFT's, Cr(s), UCreat(s), CRP's, FBC(e) ESR(e) - not sure if there are a few pages missing as I only have results for Cr(s), UCreat(s),CRP's, FBC(e), ESR(e). Can't seem to see a page with LFT results, and no Ca or Cor Ca results anywhere either. Probably on the missing page.
Next test was Jan 2018 (last Wed) for GLU, ESR, CRP, MBA,LIP, FBE. Ca was 2.73, Corr Ca was 2.65...again can't see anything pertaning to Vit D unless is has a different code altogether than what you mention. There are quite a few things measured in nmol/L though, e.g PO4 , Bili, Urate, Creat, Urea, An Gap, HCO3, Cl, K,Na. Any of these Vit D?
ptolemy Reeceregan
Posted
My vit D results have vit D in the title and I would have thought yours would, it will be a separate test not included with anything else, it is not any of the things you mention. Probably the same heading as you had in August. As you were OK perhaps they did not worry with a vit D test, I only have a vit D test once a year and I started at 25. You do seem to be lucky they are doing so many tests so often. I normally just have ESR and CRP regularly, the rest are at least six months apart unless there was a problem then I talk to my doctor, usually over the phone.
EileenH Reeceregan
Posted
As ptolemy says, vit D is generally a separate request and doesn't come under liver function or electrolytes for example.
Reeceregan EileenH
Posted