The Urolift procedure; patient views and questions
Posted , 264 users are following.
Would it be possible to keep this thread purely about Urolift and a means of sharing experiences from those who have undergone the process and invite debate from those considering it.
The Urolift process plus pros and cons are accurately described at many a website. Other very long threads discuss in detail BPH and other treatments such as TURPS, laser tend to overshadow people looking for advice on Urolift.
So for me, tired of getting up in the night. Tired of the medication and its side effects, tiredness and ED. Quality of life getting me down. I am 60 and reckon to be pretty fit and active.
I underwent this treatment (as an alternative to TURPS) 2 weeks ago at one of the 5 or 6 clinics/hospitals that appear to offer this treatment in the UK. It really was as simple as described on the web.
I had a 30 minute consultation with the consultant whereby he explained the procedure.
The treatment was booked for 10 am., it took about 15 minutes. I had it done under a local anaesthetic. To be frank if you are used to having your prostate and other bits probed there is no pain. It is just the thought of it you have to come to terms with. After the treatment you have to drink a lot of water to flush your system but I was allowed to drive home by dinner time.
First warning here. I did have to stop probably every 15 minutes with a sudden need to urinate. Fortunately I took a urine bottle from the clinic !
I could write for ages but will see what response I get to this post. I know on the day I was there, 4 other blokes were having the procedure and I sensed there was a regular flow of patients.
I’m now going through the period whereby I’m asking myself is there any improvement? It’s only 2 weeks in. I’m not sure is the answer at the moment. We are all different and recovery and improvement I am told does take time anything from 2/3 weeks to 2/3 months maybe longer. Your system needs time to readjust, I understand that, I don’t know how much time but I’m due for a follow up next week. I'm remaining positive.Would welcome comments from others.
18 likes, 1911 replies
ernest7162 charles40613
Posted
bob120 ernest7162
Posted
Bladder capacity is a big reason it may not work as hoped for. After years of bph, the bladder becomes muscularized which reduces bladder capacity due to a thick wall of muscle being built up on the inside of the bladder. My bladder capacity is only 300ml to 400ml until I wake up and have to go. My overnight output is about 1000 ml., so I have to get up 3 or 4 times a night, even though my PVR is only 35ml. When my PVR was over 200ml, I was getting up about twice as much, because I would reach that 300m to 400ml capacity twice as quickly.
It would be nice if urologists would explain all the mechanics of what is actually happening to cause bph symptoms instead of just saying yu have a blockage and a procedure will fix it all.
For the majority of urologists the first step is a drug like flomax and/or avodart, and the second step is to do a cystoscope and view the blockage, then tests to measure your bladder capacity and PVR. Then they tell you you will need a procedure. They have enough info to tell you what you can expect in the way of results, but they sugar coat it and let you find out for yourself what does and doesn't work.
ernest7162 bob120
Posted
ChuckP bob120
Posted
bob120 ChuckP
Posted
Happy New Year to you and your family as well. Do you know how large your prostate was and if the PAE reduced the size?
I've gotten used to getting up at night, using a couple of 1 liter urinals next to my bed. I can go in the dark and get right back to sleep.
My main problems after two GL's and a Turp in 3-1/2 years is that my prostate grows at an enormous rate. Twice during this period my prostate was measured at above 300g. and on my last sonogram it was measured at 203g. I'm currently on avodart to try to shrink it and will have another sonogram in April after 6 months on Avodart. At that point I have to decide if i should try the PAE to permanently shrink the prostate and allow me to get off the Avodart.
Minor annoyances now are a crazy split stream that has got me sitting down to pee, and a burning sensation at the end of urination during the day (usually after I have been sitting down for a couple of hours).
Luckily the retro I got after the turp doesn't bother me, but I do get a pinching pain when I have an orgasm.
All these procedures have so far prevented me from going back into retention, and my PVR is good, but they must have left behind a scarred and damaged urethra.
ChuckP bob120
Posted
bob120 ChuckP
Posted
I'm 69. I hope our 2016 is better than our 2015. Happy New Year.
michael72708 charles40613
Posted
My only hesitation with the MRI is the possible side effects of the contrast dye. Same possible issue with the PAE ( plus radiation). Maybe I'm overly concerned about possible side effects. Put in Mercola and contrast dye in google and you'll see why.
bob120 michael72708
Posted
nealpros michael72708
Posted
Neal
bob120 michael72708
Posted
arthur48393 charles40613
Posted
i am 80 and been keen for the past two years but have been waiting for proven results .
thanks Arthur
federico91251 charles40613
Posted
And I have the same concern as many: since the prostate will continue to grow, no matter what, how is that possible that the implants do not block that expand process and so the prostate explode or could be perforate by the implant?
I really appreciate if someone, in this forum, has an answer for me.
Thanks.
raymond_82800 federico91251
Posted
kenneth1955 federico91251
Posted