Treatment with Ezetrol is it safe?
Posted , 11 users are following.
I have taken Ezetrol for approximately 7 years having had considerable problems with statins and leg pain. 3 years ago I began to have sensations of heat and nerve pain in my legs . I was , a year later, sent to a neurologist but no determination of the cause was found. I also had a Doppler to assess the circulation, sent to a cardiologist who said it was normal. I thought the point of me seeing him was that the results were abnormal and were certainly very different from an earlier one at the time of the statins saga.I am now suffering pain in legs and the area of liver and a general malaise with some dizziness. This week I am to have a blood test to assess the liver function. I was never ill until the word Cholesterol came into my life and I have never been well since. There is plenty of information as time passes from Drs and other health care professionals who now seem prepared to stand and say that Cholesterol, statins and ezetimibe are not as they have been described to us. Cholesterol is necessary and statins and ezetimibe are questionable treatments.
1 like, 40 replies
ian189 jennifer17456
Posted
sankirk jennifer17456
Posted
Note... Find out from others if quitting the drug suddenly has negative consequences. Good luck
bill80656 jennifer17456
Posted
He is just a medical dinosaur set in his old uniformed and archaic ways.
When I was last in his office he was pushing statins on a new unsuspecting patient. I wanted to take the new patient aside and tell him to research the side.
effects of statins and the whole BS regarding cholesterol as the cause of heart disease before he started to take them.
I'm not see this MD dinosaur anymore to say the least.
One example of his ignorance and stupidity. I found out from my regular doc that I was prediabetic, I also was also having bad night sweats, terrible night leg cramps, and extreme muscle pain and weakness in one arm. I told my cardiologist this and that I was stopping the statins since research on the web told me that all those symtoms were caused by statins which I have come to find out was very true.(They are all gone now a year later, except that I still have pre-diabetes, which may never go away!) So I told him this and he looked at me and said, " I would rather have you die from diabetes than from a heart attack"!
How crazy is that? I don't need to die from either. Cholesterol causing heart attacks is a myth.
jennifer17456 bill80656
Posted
pat11500 bill80656
Posted
lee12629 pat11500
Posted
lee12629 jennifer17456
Posted
jennifer17456 lee12629
Posted
lee12629 jennifer17456
Posted
sankirk jennifer17456
Posted
jude65855 sankirk
Posted
Certainly those of us who do experience negative effects show a lot of variation: for example, you mention flu like symptoms, which I never had on any of the statins and I began to feel better within a week of going off them. The example I've given before on this forum is that on statins it took me two weeks to stack a 2 ton load of firewood: a couple of months later and two weeks off the statins, it took me two DAYS to do exactly the same thing! That convinced me, esp as I'd been assuming the exhaustion was because I have COPD, which can make you tired at times, but nothing like the utter exhaustion and weakness I experienced on statins.
jude65855 jennifer17456
Posted
Have you thought of just going off it for a couple of weeks and seeing if the negative effects reduce or vanish?
It seems you didn't have a heart attack so were the prescriptions only on the basis of "high bad cholesterol"?
jennifer17456 jude65855
Posted
pat11500 jennifer17456
Posted
jennifer17456 pat11500
Posted
Who sets these levels? Could it be the companies that make and sell them into the health systems?
jude65855 pat11500
Posted
jude65855 jennifer17456
Posted
My responses to your post is that a couple of years ago I found some info on the internet stating that the level at which ldl is regarded as dangerous (& therefore needing medication, ie statins) was lowered back in (I think) the 70's or 80's by a US Committee which included a high representation of ..... guess what? ...... drug companies.
So I reckon you're right: whether or not the change was justified and backed up by research I do not know ...
pat11500 jude65855
Posted
jude65855 pat11500
Posted
pat11500 jude65855
Posted
jude65855 pat11500
Posted
For example, my cardiologist once told me I had to stop eating yoghurt bc latest research said it was dangerous for women who'd had heart attacks:: when I checked the internet it was one tiny study. And I'm still eating yoghurt (low fat greek style), as I've done since long before it was trendy to do so.
lee12629 jude65855
Posted
jude65855 lee12629
Posted
paul59051 pat11500
Posted
I am a three time stent patient at 50 years with two heart attacks and have ankylosing spondylitis. Have taken statins and Ezetrol for on/off 25 years. Am a cynic when it comes to doctors underplaying the side effects of statins. There is definitely no evidence to show that women of any age who have not experienced a cardiovascular incident should statins as a preventive measure. A good place to look at statin research or any other med for that matter is the Cochrane Librabry - they provide simple English summaries for lay people as well.
Have been back on Ezetrol for 5 months now and wonder if it is not the cause for my present acute fatigue and muscle pain.
Greetings from Cape Town