Trying to decide on multifocal or monovision IOLs
Posted , 15 users are following.
I had pretty much decided to get the Symfony multifocal. My husband likes his. I have had monovision contacts for almost 20 years and had no trouble adjusting. But it just seems to me if both eyes are working together it’s got to be better. Then the doctor told me in my case it’s a toss-up or maybe 51% in favor of monovision.
What is making me re-think this is that my dad had macular degeneration.
The tech sent me this email-
A family history of ARMD is something we like to take into account. Having family history increases your risk of developing macular degenration (though doesn't guarantee it). In folks that have macular degenration we typically advise against getting the multifocal as the quality will likely be limited. In people who have no sign of macular degenration at the moment (such as yourself), we are certainly ok with people pursuing the multifocal. However, if you wanted to pursue the most conservative approach, pursuing monovision would over the multifocal would likely be a better option if you were to develop macular degenration later in life.
Do I am really having trouble deciding.
0 likes, 85 replies
susan44499
Posted
My sister has the dry form of ARMD which cannot be helped by the shots, but even if you have the wet form that can be, I was told it’s still better to not have the multifocal IOLs.
I distinctly remember the cataract doctor saying to me it was 50-50 for monovision or multifocal and then he said , well actually 51% for monovision. And it was up to me- to use my gut.
But when I talked to my optometrist she said she got a report from him and in there he wrote- I did encourage her to go with the monovision but I would certainly do multifocal if she wanted that.
This optometrist said the thing she’s found with multifocals is if your vision isn’t great /crystal clear/ perfect , they can’t do a whole lot -they can’t prescribe glasses or contacts to make it better.
She also told me with my eyes being used to monovision for 20 years they may have trouble working together with the multifocals.
Sue.An susan44499
Posted
I ended up going with Symfony lenses and am happy with them although I thank my surgeon and these forums as both made me aware of the night vision trade-off.
I had such good vision that it wasn’t my intention to see my optometrist for any follow up. Night Hawk encouraged me to go to get a base line to have for any subsequent future visits so 2 months after my surgeries I went. My optometrist texted me and rechecked everything and said she was surprised how well I could see and said I got ‘lucky’
What I think is most people who see well don’t go back to their optometrist. I honestly wasn’t until encouraged to go. So the patient the optometrist sees after cataract surgery are those with monofocals who need glasses of some sort but get good clarity at one focal point or the unhappy multifocal patient who may need glasses or have so many night time visual artifacts that they complain to their optometrist. They rarely see the happy patient who forks out $100 to an optometrist who confirms their vision is good.
Please don’t take my comments to mean I am pushing you towards Symfony or any multifocal lens. I didn’t (and don’t) have any underlying eye issues.
What you want is for someone to let you know what the trade-offs are: and there is a compromise to make with every lens make no mistake about that.
Take into consideration what you do for a living or hobby. How much night driving do you do. What personality type are you. I read a humorous post before my surgery about IOLs and personality types. It was advising surgeons to choose patients carefully. Multifocal lenses for someone who is an engineer and who notices a knat on the far wall of a theatre with astronomy as a hobby and a Jewish lawyer for a brother in-law would be your worse case scenario patient.
All kidding aside, if you have AMD in your family and it is hereditary perhaps scales for you should tip in the monofocal category. But do your research - I am no expert and perhaps Symfony would be no worse than a monofocal if you developed AMS too but I don’t know the answer to that. Might be a question to pose to a few specialists for an educated response.
Good luck to you Susan. Wish you the best.
at201 susan44499
Posted
You are defining monovision correctly.
I just wanted to be sure about that because of your statement, "My optometrist said her patients who have opted for monovision are more likely to need reading glasses." That is definitely not true if one of the eyes is set for reading, as is in my case.
susan44499 at201
Posted
susan44499 Sue.An
Posted
I was using the term Multifocal as interchageable with Symfony and perhaps I should not, though my dr calls it a multifocal. It is the Symfony I have been talking about here vs monovision and the Symfony that they said would not be as good were I to get AMD.
When your optometrist advised you against multifocals he/she didn't mean Symfony too apparently.
I think even if people are happy with their vision, they'd still see an optometrist to be checked for glaucoma and macular degeneration.
Sue.An susan44499
Posted
As for follow up visits to optometrist I doubt I would have gone unless I was experiencing a problem or at least waited 2 years as my insurance company only covers visits every 2 years. I paid out of pocket for my last visit (due to these forums) which I can understand now is beneficial to know what my exact prescription is 8 weeks after surgery. Both my eyes are plano (so no mini monovision) and I see well from 11 inches and beyond. Very pleased with the result as I thought I would be holding my iPhone out at arm’s length to read it. I have t needed glasses since my surgeries. I am young to get cataracts at 53 and I need reading and computer distance for work.
Sue.An susan44499
Posted
susan44499 Sue.An
Posted
susan44499 Sue.An
Posted
Here is what they told me-
A family history of ARMD is something we like to take into account. Having family history increases your risk of developing macular degenration (though doesn't guarantee it). In folks that have macular degenration we typically advise against getting the multifocal as the quality will likely be limited. In people who have no sign of macular degenration at the moment (such as yourself), we are certainly ok with people pursuing the multifocal. However, if you wanted to pursue the most conservative approach, pursuing monovision would over the multifocal would likely be a better option if you were to develop macular degenration later in life.
susan44499 Sue.An
Posted
On the issue of Macular Degeneration-
"It is true that multifocal lenses have an extended depth of field which is achieved by spreading out the light, whereas monofocal lenses focus all of the light at a single point. Dr. XXX does not typically recommend multifocal or Symfony lenses for people with AMD.
The complex optics of a multifocal lens do not work well in patients with vision limitations from other eye conditions (like AMD, glaucoma, etc). "
susan44499 Sue.An
Posted
The Symfony does have far less issues with contrast issues than the traditional multifocal IOLs do. If you are going to have a multifocal IOL, the Symfony is the one to have.
Sue.An susan44499
Posted
Take your time to make a decision - there’s no rush. Do what’s best for you with the info you have and if still uncertain - gather more info.
susan44499
Posted
With mini-monovision (not true monovision) you will still need reading glasses for close work and reading.
I think I’d prefer true monovision then, which is what my contacts are now, even though it means. less good depth perception.
susan44499
Posted