Urolift cost
Posted , 7 users are following.
Hey all,
I'm 32 years old and have been diagnosed with BPH. I'm currently on Cialis to help with the symptoms. I've been on it for almost a week and haven't noticed a huge change in symptoms, except last night I was able to sleep through the night.
I had been taking benedryl to help me sleep at night for about 2 years, but found out that this was aggrevating the problem. I was also on Paxil for about 5 years and was told that this could have contributed as well.
I was told that I was a good candidate for Urolift but my insurance doesn't cover it. My urologist's office told me that they would charge about $500 for his fee, but we would need to do it at a surgical center (I haven't contacted them for an estimate yet). I then found a urologist that does it in house and asked how much it would cost for him to do it. His office told me that it would be between $4-7k based on how many implants I would need.
I read on here that some folks were able to get estimates as low as $2500. Should I branch out and try to find someone that will do it that cheaply or is the $4-7k number pretty standard?
Thanks in advance.
0 likes, 33 replies
kenneth1955 daniel96751
Posted
daniel96751 kenneth1955
Posted
The urologist actually suggested TURP, which I was talked down from by my primary care physician and my wife. I had to ask about urolift and they said he didn't offer it because my insurance doesn't cover it. We are definitely not done having children, so this is pretty much the only option that I'm aware of.
Thanks so much for responding. I'm pretty miserable about having to go all the time.
kenneth1955 daniel96751
Posted
daniel96751 kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 daniel96751
Posted
daniel96751 kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 daniel96751
Posted
daniel96751
Posted
kenneth1955 daniel96751
Posted
kenneth1955 daniel96751
Posted
daniel96751 kenneth1955
Posted
carl11484 daniel96751
Posted
Do you guys know what insurance company's are not covering it??.
I have BC/BS and Medicare.
Thanks
Carl
daniel96751 carl11484
Posted
kenneth1955 carl11484
Posted
carl11484 kenneth1955
Posted
They already scheduled it.
If they do the surgery an its not covered, I'm not giving them a half of a cent.. It's there job to call an see what's covered or not.
carl11484 kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks
Carl
kenneth1955 carl11484
Posted
carl11484 kenneth1955
Posted
Because medicare is my secondary ins. Cause BC/BS is my primary ins.
kenneth1955 carl11484
Posted
daniel96751 kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 daniel96751
Posted
kenneth1955 daniel96751
Posted
daniel96751 kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 daniel96751
Posted
tim07875 kenneth1955
Posted
You're right. In todays medical world, cost is everything. They did point out to me before the TERP that my ability to have children would be gone after this procedure. I'm in my 60's and my kid-making days are long behind me. TERP is a big deal, but as I mentioned earlier, I did a green laser treatment which was poor. I urinated blood for months, and honestly received no relief from my symptoms. I'm told it was one of those flash-in-the-pan procedures. The pain from the laser procedure was much worse than the TERP. Again, I'm early in the recovery process, but so far, so good.
kenneth1955 tim07875
Posted
nealpros tim07875
Posted
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
Most physicians and patients often assume that recovery of urinary and sexual function after 1 year following radical prostatectomy is rare. This study determined the probability of achieving good urinary and erectile function long-term in men who reported poor function 12 months out from radical prostatectomy. Over 3000 men undergoing radical prostatectomy with extended follow-up including patient-reported function scores were identified. The authors found that a significant percentage of men with both urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction at 1 year postoperatively improved over time. The probability of achieving good urinary function at 24, 36, and 48 months was 30%, 49%, and 59%, respectively. In men with erectile dysfunction at 12 months, the probability of recovering erectile function at 24, 36, and 48 months was 22%, 32%, and 40%, respectively. Recovery was stronger in men with higher scores at 12 months.
The findings indicate that men with incontinence and/or erectile dysfunction at 12 months have higher than anticipated rates of subsequent functional improvement.
(This still doesn't sound good to me, and makes Urolift, or PAE look even better! )
Neal
kenneth1955
Posted