Alternative treatment for BPH
Posted , 14 users are following.
does anyone have experience of Saw Palmetto?. I have read that it may be just as effective as prescribed drugs. Found them in the shops but rather expensive
1 like, 48 replies
Posted , 14 users are following.
does anyone have experience of Saw Palmetto?. I have read that it may be just as effective as prescribed drugs. Found them in the shops but rather expensive
1 like, 48 replies
We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.
derek76 gee013
Posted
I was having frequency, some urgency and a slow stream and of course several visits to the toilet during the night.
I refused TURP looking for laser options to come on stream. I took saw palmetto first as capsules but never quite believe that dried out versions are as good as liquid ones. I then found a herbalist who sold Saw Palmetto as a tincture. I found that more effective in reducing urgency and frequency and some improvement in flow. It did nothing to stop me needing in the night.
It did not stop my prostate from growing and by 2005 it was 75grms and I opted for GL Laser (PVP)
The tincture was quite expensive and I later managed to trace the company who produced it and bought it in 2 litre lots from them at a fraction of the price.
If you are interested and in the UK I can PM you their details if you like.
chris15677 derek76
Posted
Best, Chris.
Jezzaman chris15677
Posted
Im in Huntingdoon so we are close.
Am booked in for GLL at Hinchingbrooke but am considering putting it off as i can pee ok at moment and have been taught self cath just in case.
Have you considered surgery?
Jeremy
chris15677 Jezzaman
Posted
I am not considering surgery until I've exhausted all other so called cures.
I've been relying on tamsulosin but its performance fluctuates quite a bit. I recently changed to Flomax (had to get permission from quack because it is more expensive than 'normal' brands). Flomax worked great for the 1st week but then started to decline so I'm experimenting with the various tamsulosin brands right now. I am investigating PAE right now but it seems it is only performed in Southampton, but a new doctor at my local surgery is also investigating - so I'll put it on here when I know more about it.
Chris.
Jezzaman chris15677
Posted
I reckon its the way to go,
Jeremy
mike04186 chris15677
Posted
Patience is a virtue but in the case of BPH, a necessity, ultimately its my belief that surgery will be needed in 90% of the cases. If a pill can stop the "wild weed" known as the prostate then fine, and the market is full of quackery in 2015 that says some are a cure all. I don't believe one word of it. Yes they might "help", but its only a matter of time before surgery is required. The older a man gets the more difficult it will become also. Who needs that? Find the best solution, and sometimes what looks like the easiest, is simply postponing the inevitable.
I wish you well.
Mike
Jezzaman mike04186
Posted
You Have had the Turp and are doing well I know and am glad to hear it.
I do take your point and largely agree however without prying too much you must surely be suffering the "standard" accepted side effects such as Retrograde Ejaculation? Despite the fact that I have now suffered 2 episodes of Acute Urine Retention (no fun at all, in fact extreme agony on the second occasion as it turns out to have been caused by an infection) I have no intention of going straight for the GL that I have been offered on the NHS. before the AUR on 27th July I had no idea that I even had BPH! I have had my catheter removed on Tuesday this week and been taught self Cat (which I insisted upon) and each day am seeing an improvement. I am voiding ok at the moment and am not even sure that the Tamsulosin, Saw Palmetto and Pumpkin seed oil are making any difference, so i am going to stop taking them and see what happens. I am now looking at PAE as the "wonder cure" with low risk and no complicationns.But it is not offered on NHS, so i will have to pay for it. As far as I know there is only one practitioner in the UK, who practices in Southampton, and I am most probably going to go for it ultimately if they deem me suitable. I would not go for a TURP unless i was in chronic AUR to be honest as the the risks seem to me too high. THis is my stance anyway,
Jeremy
derek76 Jezzaman
Posted
When Moderated.
http://www.oxfordinterventionalradiology.com/www.OxfordInterventionalRadiology.com/Prostate_Artery_Embolisation.html
mike04186 Jezzaman
Posted
Thank you, the least important thing to me was or is retrograde ejaculation, I'm 69 and have zero plans of having a child. The most important thing in my life was and still is, the ability to void when I wanted. After 2 episodes of retention over here, its almost an automatic surgery your looking at, they won't let anyone carry on with this thing. As the specialist told me "it has to be fixed". They are frightened of infection and trust me its nothing to take lightly.
I too was going to pay for my own Plasma Button, but on examination was told very clearly that a TURP was required, "in my case". Having said that, the surgeon who was going to perform the Plasma Button, did not get the $7000.00 dollars for the surgery, but the Medical System picked up the cost. He was the one who said that I needed the TURP.
He had everything to gain from doing the Plasma Button and yet sent me to have the TURP, he obviously thought that the TURP was the best solution for me. I was extremely fortunate to have had that examination by him. My prostate was 103 grams, not the 'normal 30 grams. My pathology report came back as totally clear of cancer.
I was in the gym this morning doing very light stretches and its only 14 days since the operation. I know only to well what it is to have a catherer in, mine was 59 days, and that is 58 days to long for me. Those who are thinking about the various procedures should consider all those that have had a history of success, and I'm sure those rates are going to vary, but the one thing I do know is that the TURP performed on me, worked. Its called the "Gold Standard" for a reason. "IF" any of the newer procedures can claim that kind of success and be free of any 'complications' I would go for it. I made my decision and glad I did.
I wish you well, and keep me posted on what you decided on. Who knows PAE could be the miracle your looking for. Have you spoken to others who have had it done?
Mike
If it sounds to good to be true, it probably is.
mike04186 chris15677
Posted
My flowmax and proscar, sit on the shelf, never to be used again, ( i hope) exactly where they should be. Now to find "something" to eliminate my need for Pantoloc for acid reflux, LOL, then I'm all set.
Mike
"May the flow be with you"
derek76 mike04186
Posted
mike04186 derek76
Posted
Mike
derek76 mike04186
Posted
I've heard of your other two.
lester90053 gee013
Posted
Jezzaman lester90053
Posted
Never say never!
mike04186 lester90053
Posted
I had my TURP done 15 days ago, and could not be happier. Give it some good thought, and speak to your Dr. about what that surgery could do for you, tell him to be honest with you and direct. You might be surprised. I wish you well.
Mike