Dangers of taking Zopiclone
Posted , 11 users are following.
Has anyone heard rerports about Zopiclone being dangerous to health and that it can eventually kill you. Sounds like scaremongering i know, but sure its not. Also, is there any proof of this.
2 likes, 38 replies
jaw444 vivien58797
Posted
However, not getting adequate sleep can also lower immunity, i think i havre read that before. i doubt that there are any studies comparing cancer rates for people not on sleeping meds who don't sleep enough and people who do take sleeping meds and to sleep enough.
Having said that, i have long been concerned about the effect of taking sleep meds on my health, and hope to get mostly off them some day, in the foreseeable future. i've been taking some kind of prescription med for sleep for about 40 years. i'm probably already toast. but i have had good immunity, so it may not be a lost cause. Here's the wikipedia link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zopiclone#Carcinogenicity
david72184 jaw444
Posted
angela15547 david72184
Posted
Quovadis vivien58797
Posted
As a previous user try to avoid this drug, its not good ( or it wasnt for me ) nearly drove me crazy
regards
angela15547 Quovadis
Posted
RobertT vivien58797
Posted
Carcinogenicity/Tumorigenicity
The tumor-producing dose was equivalent to 800 times the usual human dose (0.125 mg/kg), and no effect occurred with doses that were 80 times the usual human dose.
Mutagenicity
Zopiclone showed no evidence of mutagenicity in a wide battery of tests. Urine extracts from zopiclone-treated mice, rats, and humans were not mutagenic. No evidence of mutagenicity was found in the DNA repair assay in rat hepatocytes (William's test), in the Ames test inSalmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli strains, or in the micronucleus test (mice).
jaw444 RobertT
Posted
In the wikipedia article linked above, they give one (and only one) citation for the research they summarize. The citation has a link (hyperlink) to the report they are citing. In the report, among other things, it says "...FDA files revealed that all four of the new hypnotics were associated with cancers in rodents. Three had been shown to be clastogenic...." i didn't know what clastogenic means, i looked it up, it means mutagenic.
The following is product information published by Sanofi, one of the manufactuers of zopiclone
Carcinogenicity
Treatment with zopiclone by dietary administration for 2 years increased the incidence of thyroid carcinomas in male rats dosed with 100 mg/kg/day, and increased the incidence of mammary carcinoma in female rats dosed with 100 mg/kg/day, probably due to interference with thyroid hormone and 17β-estradiol metabolism. Studies with mice treated with zopiclone at dietary doses up to 100 mg/kg/day showed no evidence of drug-related carcinogenicity.
i will post the link in a separate post to avoid the admin review delay in posting this one.
There are so many things in the environment that are carcinogenic. My reaction to this has been to minimize exposure, but there are various things i accept exposure to for practical reasons. The need for sleep has been one of these. But i'm retired now and going off sleep meds is more realistic for me than it used to be.
jaw444
Posted
RobertT jaw444
Posted
According to the New Zealand data sheet:
Careful consideration of the results suggest the findings bear little
meaningful relationship to potential carcinogenic threat to man.
According to the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC):
Carcinogenicity
From studies performed in rats and mice it can be concluded that for patients receiving long-term medication with Zopiclone no carcinogenic potential exists.
Mutagenicity
Both in vitro and in vivo studies failed to show mutagenicity produced by Zopiclone.
******************************************
If you look at the Kripke scientific paper "Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study" (link below) there's quite an interesting graph. You can see that a higher death rate for those taking hypnotics is most marked for older people.
Until explained otherwise I would tend to expect that it's carefree, happy people who tend to live longer.
RobertT jaw444
Posted
RobertT
Posted
Anyway take a look at it yourselves and draw your own conclusions.
vivien58797 RobertT
Posted
angela15547 vivien58797
Posted
linda83143l angela15547
Posted
I also tea the write up and alot of people are taking a higher dose ie over 15mg.
They purchase extra drug via the internet or on the street.
Oops should be I also read the write up.
Since the new classification of zopiclone, it is now a restricted drug.
The problem being is this reclassification going to drive people to get the drug where ever they can.
Drug pushers will be delighted.
What drug will they be given? They can put anything in the tablets.... Dangerous.
Drs prescribed the drug...you becime addicted and then take the pills away.
Is this a way forward..... don't think so.
angela15547 linda83143l
Posted
linda83143l angela15547
Posted
Zopiclone.
These patients really have no choice. They are already addicted.
The Drs caused the addicted by prescribing this drug.
Its a severe problem that we will see in the next year.
Where will the addicted person obtain their drugs.
Where will they get the money to buy the
Drugs?
If taken in a sensible manner this drug will give you sleep but remember everything comes ay a cost.
You lose yourself to this drug. It becomes your life....my next pill....