Help! I Have A Problem
Posted , 10 users are following.
I was cathetered from Friday the18th of March to the 11th of Apriil when they removed it. The only time it was out was for an hour or two when I underwent the green light laser treatment. on April 7. The reason for the long catherization was because I went into 100% retention on the 18th of March.
At first I urinated good, gradually I would go, then stop and I would find that I had to "pump" the remaining urine. Next, I had to bear down and pump from start to finish.
Now, today I can't go at all. I can't even force start so it looks like to ER for me this night.
I don't know what's happening.
(At this point i was in the bathroom for 10 minutes as I had the urge to go. I did go somewhat but it was like birthing a baby
I was tested yesterday...no infection.
I have no infection and the op was a success. I can't figure this out. Will see doctor on Monday.
Tom
1 like, 94 replies
John-T tom512836
Posted
Hope things are getting better with you, I also have a catheter for the past 6 weeks waiting for a HOLEP operation, what I think could be happening is that your bladder got lazy from the catheter, did you have a bag for your urine all the time or just at night, the reason I'm asking this is because I also was wearing a catheter and a leg bag all the time day and night for the first month, I then thought about putting a valve instead of a bag so the urine will stay in the bladder and every few hours I would go to the washroom and open the valve and empty my bladder, this way you bladder get to do some work, bladder is a muscle, it could of been streched from urine retention and lost it's elastacity and now from being inactive for about 1 month in your case it's possible that it's just lazy and will slowly get back to normal function, I'm no urologist but it's worth the try so get yourself a valve while you still have the catheter if that's the case.
thanks
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for getting back, well you know Ken I seen 3 different urologist and they all told me after various tests that my prostate was huge and needed an operation, one proposed the old TURP method, the 2nd one proposed Green Light surgery and the 3rd one proposed HOLEP, after many research online I came to the conclusion that HOLEP was the best of the 3, I also heard about Urolift but I don't think it's advisable since I heard many horror stories about it plus the fact that the prostate is strapped with brackets, it will keep groing usually at a 2% rate per year, bringing in more problems quickly. As far as side effects from the operation, they told me about retrograted ejaculation which I ate to gave away but if it's going to help me urinate normally it's a trade off I'm willing to take. You see the way all this happened to me is I started to feel very nauseated about 2 months ago, I went to the ER and my creatinine in the blood was 230 which is terribly high so after many test they noticed that I had urine retention of about 750 ml, but I never had problems urinating it's just that I was not emptying my bladder but I use to go many time to urinate and sometimes I could not hold it in and had to rush to the washroom, after wearing the cath for 5 days, they removed it to do a systoscopy and the first urologist told me that my bladder was swollen and stretched from the urine retention, in any case they told me to try to urinate and from that point on I could not urinate at all, just a few drops, so a week before I was urinating fine and after the 5 day cath and systoscopy I could not urinate anymore and since that time about 6 weeks now I have a catheter and as my last post said about 2 weeks ago I added a valve to the catheter instead of a urine bag during the day, this way my bladder is getting back some action and I'm feeling some urge to urinate and urine in my bladder so I go and open the valve and empty in the toilet. Tell me what is your story Ken
Thanks
John
steven43881 John-T
Posted
I had a TURP done in 2009. As I look at the report now it says my postvoiding residual on Dec 15 of that year was 137 cc. I had bladder calculi extracted on that same day and the report of that says my residual was 175 cc. On Dec 21 of that year my post voiding residual states that it was approximately 250 cc. On top of this I had chronic Prostatitis. I think I made a mistake having the TURP done, John. Don't be a fool. If it doesn't bother you-- leave it alone. I let my not being able to pee right go on for years. I am suffering severe depression right now and feel as if my life is hanging on a thread. I don't know if there is anywhere for me to turn to and read these posts to try and get some answers. I manage to go through my life a day at a time and hoping that someone on here will give me some encouragment and say to me that Yes, Steve life is worth living and you will eventually find an answer. Ken knows, He has been with me on this journey, but right now feeling is if I had made a mistake and rushed into it is more than my emotions can handle. After all it Is My body; how could the dr. have done this to me. So PEASE think this over. It has been over 6 years now and I am srill suffering for the very dreadful decision I have made because I was in such pain. If you are not in pain, please don't do it, John. I implore you
Steve
John-T steven43881
Posted
Thanks for getting back and explaining a little more your situation. Ok so you are saying you shouldn't have done the TURP because it did not fix your urinating issue and produced the retrograted ejaculation condition. But what do you do for not being able to pee for the past 6 years, do you self-cath. As for me well there is a blockage and the first step is to remove the blockage because of my huge prostate, don't want to wear a cath or self-cath forever.
Thanks and hang in there
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
steven43881 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thank you so much for your touching story, you are very brave to have gone through all that, not sure what to think but not sure if the Urolift is the way to go, you had problems with it and so are most people that done it, the prostate does not shrink it's just compressed but keeps growing at a 2% rate per year so you most likely will always have some issues with it plus all kinds of infection everytime they work in there, in any case i appreciate the time your are taking to explain to me your story and I sure hope one day you will be well and wish a lot of luck for all of us that are suffering from this condition.
Keep the faith
John
John-T steven43881
Posted
Thanks for getting back to me, if I understand correctly you had a wrong diagnostic of BPH and got TURP instead of treatment but really you had Prostatitis which could of been cured with antibiotics, as for me according to all test I have BPH with a huge prostate and also had an episode of urine retention about 6 years ago where the urologist then told me my prostate was a little big and gave me flowmax and things got back to normal. So you are saying maybe I have Prostatitis instead of BPH, but I had all BPH symptoms, in any case I'm doing more research and should maybe try to live a day without the catheter to see if I can urinate and empty my bladder before getting an operation.
Thanks for great advice
John
steven43881 John-T
Posted
No, I had BPH and the TURP in most cases cured this. I pee like a race horse now. For many years my stream was EXTREMELY weak and my bladder retained more and more urine to the point wear I developed many bladder stones. I also had multiple kidney stones. I think what happened to me is that the stail urine somehow got down into my prostate and infected the organ to the point where I developed chronic prostatitis. Antibiotics were of no help in fighting this awful disease. I tried Cipro and Bactrum for years with no relief at all. I'm seeing a wonderful Dr. now who I think is going to try to help me. I put my COMPLETE faith in him and will follow his instructions to the very letter.
What I'm trying to tell you is that maybe I didn't need the TURP at all. This awful Dr. rushed into it, when I thought it might help my prostatitis symptoms. The symptoms being having pain in the perrenial area, feeling like your sitting on a lump. My symptoms started with a burning feeling at the end of my penis. I wish I was offered Avadort in addition to the Flomax that I was taking. That might have helped down the line; but instead I was rushed into the hospital and they did the TURP without even telling me that there were medications for the condition that could help me. I don't even believe in the urolifts because if medication can help you down the line, why bother with these medical procedures at all.
I HOPE I can help you,John Please think this thing over and know that you have a Friend on here that may have just met his calling.
Sincerely,
Steve
John-T steven43881
Posted
Thanks for getting back and explaining to me your situation so I can understand it better, I do understand you being rushed through the TURP operation that you probably did not need and not giving the medication alternatibe but as for me I don't have any of these Prostatitis symptoms so I'm kind of stuck in a position of believing 3 urologist that have the same diagnostic of BPH and kind of desparate to pee like you like a horse.
Thanks for being there much appreciated
John
steven43881 John-T
Posted
Steve
John-T steven43881
Posted
I understand where you`re coming from, most doctores are like robots, no human feelings, for them it`s a business to make money, the 2nd urologist I saw that day for the Green light surgery had another 52 patients that day so not really any time to concentrate on each patient and take the time to offer different options and alternative. In any case I believe in Karma, and the guilty one will get a taste of it, no one escapes the Lord's law.
Be strong, good things will happen
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
steven43881 John-T
Posted
I believe that. I'm still wondering if there's any scar tissue in there that might be bothering me, hopefully I will find out soon. You do what you feel you must do. I try to respect everybodies decision on here and treat them as human beings in what ever decisions they may make in their lives. If they have a beef, I try to support them. I hope you can respect that. Please keep in touch, John on where you go fom here. I will always be Supportive of you.
Steve
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for the message and concern, as far as my blockage, well first the way all this happened is I felt sick and nauseated, went to ER, had my creatinine level way high to 230, after other test they noticed that I had 750ml of urnine in my bladder and at that point I had no blockage at all but I wasn`t emptying my bladder so they put a cath on for 5 days, then I had a systoscopy and after that they sent me home no cath but told me if you can`t pee to come back to the ER and have a cath put on, so I left home and drank a few water bottle but could not feel any urge to pee and when I tried, only a few drop would come out so from this point on I could not pee so I went back to ER the same night and they again put a cath on which I now have for the past 6 weeks, just changed it last week to a new one, I also have a valve on so during the day I keep the urine in the bladder to make it work and empty a few times a day and at night I put the bag on, so this is where I am now, 3 urlologist told me my prostate was huge and needed operation and that I was past taking care of it with just Flowmax. So now not sure what else to do, removing the cath and see if I can pee or just wait for the call to get operated.
Thanks Ken
John
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for explaining to me a little more about your Urolift episode, yes you`re right there are flaws and risks with all methods. I can`t find any place here that practise Urolift and don`t have the cash to fly out somewhere to have it done so looks like I will have to go with HOLEP.
I`ll keep you posted
Thanks Ken
John
John-T steven43881
Posted
Thanks for getting back and I appreciate and respect what you have to say. I'm kind stuck in a position that I need to trust the urologist, Urolift for me it's out of reach here in Montreal, don't have the budget to fly to the States and have it done. I'm not even sure either if after doing HOLEP i'll be able to pee ok so what else can I do.
I'll keep you posted
John
steven43881 John-T
Posted
My prostate was a little smaller than yours so I'm not sure why they did the TURP on me. I wish it had been different, but that was back almost 7 years ago!!! I will keep you in my prayers and be here to support you in whatever endeaver you may choose. I'm curious: why a HOLEP in stead of a Turp? Is it because of the less invasivness of the procedure? Please get back and let me know, John. I will follow you throigh this thing if you want me too
Steve
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T steven43881
Posted
Not sure why, by what the feel I have form Urologists, they attempts to remove the blockage that an enlarge prostate brings so for them it's normal procedure, not sure if they have a size limit or minimum size to schedule an operation and in your case you had TURP. Well with HOLEP yes it's less invasive, less bleeding, maximum of 24 hours stay, cath for only the first 24 hours, less chances of erectile discfunctions, good for any size of prostate, so for me it's the number one choice. My Urologist told me that it's the most efficient method and with the other methods they wouldn't be able to get the job done properly. I did extensive research on HOLEP and it's way better that Green Light.
I'll keep you posted and I do appreciate you following me through this
thanks
John
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for the message,
Yes there is less bleeding with HOLEP, no size limit of the prostate to do the procedure, 24 hour stay at the most, they can also grab some samples for further analysis, less chances of erectile dysfunctions, so all in all much better than TURP or Green Light. Yes that is a good idea, I will tell him not to touch the bladder neck to get a better chance not to have retro, I can't remember the part he wanted to remove when I was in his office, he showed me a diagram of the prostate and showed me where he would remove so I'll ask him again before the procedure.
Much appreciated Ken
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for getting back, yes for sure it make sense, so I'll have a serious talk with the urologist before the procedure.
Yes have a good remaining of weekend yourself too
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
Motoman kenneth1955
Posted
Maybe you should tone it down a bit. I keep reading posts like this, and just can't believe my eyes.
Do you know whether they can do Holep without a bladder neck incision? Or is that a new procedure you came up with to prevent RE? Why didn't the doctors think of it and provide it?
For some people, having the freedom to pee when you need or want to, far outweighs any other side effects. But I keep reading about you going on and on about basically how bad RE is on here.
I for sure would do Holep or TURP when the time comes, over having to use a catheter or not be able to go about my daily life. I'm 53, have an active life and sex life, but I can live with RE over not being able to pee on command.
Forums should be for sharing information, yes. But let the professionals do the rest.
kenneth1955 Motoman
Posted
steven43881 Motoman
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for that, well you know maybe not all Urologist scrap the whole prostate so for sure I will have a good talk before moving forward with it but for me the trade off from not being able to pee and wearing a catheter for months to having HOLEP done and being able to pee and have that retrograted ejaculation condition, I would still chose to do the HOLEP right now I'm misearable walking around with a cath and not having sex so I just can't wait to get it done, for me self-cath is not an option I don't see myself doing this 6 times a day plus how many infection will I get doing this.
John
kenneth1955 steven43881
Posted
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
steven43881 kenneth1955
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
I'll keep you posted
thanks
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
kenneth1955 steven43881
Posted
steven43881 kenneth1955
Posted
The only problem with this is the middle lobe was noted when he was doing the TURP. Are you saying that if he treated the prostatitis then the middle lobe would have went down. That just doesn't make sense. AND what about all the bladder stones and retained urine which did form the bladder stones.
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
jjjj57989 kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 jjjj57989
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for the message, no the urologist did not mention it but I read on it a while back and again there are other types of side effects:
This treatment does not require anesthesia. But it may lead to incontinence. The stent may become dislodged. Stones may form on the stent. There may be blockage. The stent may be hard to remove. Minor side effects include having to urinate often and right away, dribbling of urine, discomfort, and light bleeding.You should not get the stent if your urethra is narrow.
Seems to me that we can't win no matter which way we go but I do appreciate your help
John
kenneth1955 jjjj57989
Posted
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for the message, yes I was given Flomax but did not do anything, 6 years ago I had an episode of blocage so they installed a catheter for 5 days then did more test and finally gave me some flowmax and was ok and stop taking them. So again about over 2 months ago now I did not feel good but was urinating fine so I went to the ER and they noticed that my creatinine was at 230 which is very high so they did more test and saw that I had about 800ml of urine in my bladder so they again installed a cath for 5 days then a systoscopy then right after that I could not urinate anymore or did not feel any urge to urinate so the put the cath on again and it's going on 2 months that I have it on, I installed a valve on it so I can give some action to my bladder, no date for operation yet, they are very slow, can't do much but wait, there's only one place that perfom HOLEP here in Montreal and the urologist is extremely busy so not much else to do but wait and hope that i will happen soon,
Hope you're doing ok
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
My only worry really is will I be able to urinate normally after the operation and I suppose that no one can really give me a guaranteed answer until I go through it, after a few months of wearing a catheter my bladder might take time to get back to normal even if I have a valve in now.
I appreciate the time you are taking for my case Ken
You're a good man
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Well I'll hope for the best for sure because no body can know the outcome of the operation until it happens, everyone reacts differently I suppose.
I'll keep you posted
Thanks
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
I'll keep you posted for sure and thanks for the prayer, I sure hope you're doing ok too
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
I'll be in touch
Thanks
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for the message, hope you enjoyed your vacation, I appreciate the help you send my way and it make sense. I guess by looking at the echo or the prostate the urologist could tell if the median lobe is large or not, in any case I'll talk it over with the urologist I know he's probably the best in the region he even taught urologist from the states how to properly do HOLEP, maybe you can do research on him, his name is Dr. Mostafa Elhilali from MUHC Royal Victoria Hospital.
Hope they call me soon
Take care
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
thanks
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Enjoy your Sunday
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for the message and encouragement, yes I guess I'm a number, I did call the hospital last week and again today, I talked to his secretary and no way to talk to him, much too busy, she told me secretaries will call me for the date, no one did, so I called back today and got the answering machine, left a message, we'll see, I'm schedule to change my catheter on the 18th of May so I will ask them to let me some slacks for a few hours and see if I can pee before putting it back on while I wait for the operation.
I'll keep you posted
Much appreciated
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for the message, yes you're right all the way, he should take time with each of his patient, I had some bad news today, I decided to call the commisionaire for complaints at the hospital to ask if it's normal to wait that long to be operated, after reviewing my file she called me back and told me there are only 2 urologist for the whole hospital performing HOLEP and there is a 70 patient waiting list some patients have been waiting since February so she told me another 4 to 6 months and also considering the summer holidays are coming so I'm at a lost, my only choice is to try to pee on my own on the 18th when I go for my catheter change and from there maybe learning how to do CIC. I live in Montreal a big city of over 7 millions, my brother lives in ontario province and a friend of his got the same thing 3 weeks ago and was operated a few days ago, mind you they did the TURP no HOLEP in that area.
Yes I'm trying to relax but very difficult, a lot of frustration since I have a 10 year old daughter to take care of 50% of the time I need to stay positive I hope you're trying to relax too and take care of yourself,
Your help is much appreciated
Enjoy your day
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted