REZUM--HAVE YOU HAD THIS DONE???????
Posted , 385 users are following.
I had a nice conversation today with the President of the "Urology Times". He was telling me that there is a "New Procedure" that has been approved called the "REZUM SYSTEM". The company that makes the system is called "NXThera, Inc". You can google them up and lots of stuff comes up. I called them for a referral and they gave me a Doctor in Minnepolis that has done it over 50 times now. I called his nurse and she said he would call me back and answer my questions on monday. As you guys probably know Doctors are not very good at returning calls but we'll see what happens. Iam not very good at explaining how the procedure works but basically they take the device and put it up the uretha and vaporize the prostate cells which kills them. It works with high pressure "steam" that at a certain degree will kill the prostate tissue. My question for you guys is there anybody out there that has had it done to them and how are you getting along and are there "side effects", etc etc?????
35 likes, 5645 replies
john98818 ChuckP
Posted
kenneth1955 john98818
Posted
ken19524 john98818
Posted
The TRUS gave your urologist an idea of the size of your prostate, but it also showed the anatomy of that area, including the urethra and its relationship to the prostate. That is, he should have been able to see whether the prostate was impeding flow. Did he say that he could see where the prostate was squeezing the urethra? What is he proposing to do about the weak stream? Maybe it is time to get a second opinion.
oldbuzzard john98818
Posted
Mine was only 30 and I had pretty severe BPH, including an enlarged median lobe. It's position and direction of growth can be more imoactful than size. There are men with 100 gram prostates who pee fine, then there are you and me.
john98818 ken19524
Posted
My Max flow rate was very poor so he said Rezum would work. I guess it's the anatomy more than the size
john98818 oldbuzzard
Posted
I think you're exactly correct OB. I'm still looking around for an experienced HoLEP guy in Colorado. Let me know knew if you have any ideas. Thanks
george22591 john98818
Posted
I visited Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale to inquire about Holep for my 42cc prostate. They told me they don't perform it on prostates smaller than 80cc, and suggested that Rezum might be a good alternative for me.
john98818 george22591
Posted
Very interesting. That's useful information. Thanks
hank1953 george22591
Posted
Tucsonjj kenneth1955
Posted
Good point, Ken, might be his bladder neck... a BNI may solve it... I am leaning that way myself... and IF it doesn't work... on to the next procedure...
steven05114 oldbuzzard
Posted
@oldbuzzard: Mine was only 30 and I had pretty severe BPH, including an enlarged median lobe.
---
Just to second oldbuzzard about the median lobe obstruction versus overall prostate size. I read an article in the Asian Journal of Urology that explained it very well. Think of the urethra as a garden hose. A lateral lobe obstruction is like stepping on the hose. A median lobe obstruction is like bending/kinking the hose.
I've got to wash and wax my car before the weather turns bad for winter. Think of kinking the garden hose behind a tire which usually totally stops the flow versus stepping on the hose which just slows it down.
In other news, after being off of this forum for about a month due to technical difficulties, it appears that technical support for patient.info has now fixed the problem with my login. It is good to be back in the saddle again (which could be rough on the prostate if the saddle was on a horse)
Steve
kenneth1955 Tucsonjj
Posted
Yes He needs to have it checked before he get's talked into something he does not need. But you also have to know that a BNI procedure has a 10 to 15% chance of retro. You need a good doctor to have it done Take care Ken
Tucsonjj kenneth1955
Posted
Ah... I think I have a good UroDoc/surgeon Dr. Wright in Tucson... one of few known for being expert in the complex HoLep procedure... I am hoping... that if he can master that one... a BNI should be a cake walk... Retro would not be good... incontinence would be far worse, IMHO.
I am 62, had a partial TURP almost 30 years ago... had some partial retro... darn Doc at the time was only supposed to do a BNI... he did the "partial" TURP without permission... nasty stuff... retro seems to have become less over the years... in line with my difficult urination increasing again at the same time...
Also, Dr. Wright still thinks the TURP is a valid option... which I found interesting...
kenneth1955 Tucsonjj
Posted
Tucsonjj kenneth1955
Posted
Agree, Ken, and he did it without my permission! No, no kids... never wanted any. And yes, the flow of semen adds much to the pleasure of ejac... did this 70 year old+ Doc forget that??? I should have sued the heck out of that clown... but didn't know that then... I'll have to ask my new UroDoc about the UroLift... done in office, any sedation? Any side effects or bleeding? thanks, Ken!
kenneth1955 Tucsonjj
Posted
Tucsonjj kenneth1955
Posted
Tucsonjj kenneth1955
Posted
Hi, Ken, just say the new UroDoc, a real winner... he does the Holep, which to me, makes him a cut above... he thinks the UroLift would be very good for me, coupled with a BNI... Does it last a long time or don't they really know yet? Doc said it takes 15 minutes, more for the BNI... but will use general or propophol, my choice...
I don't mind the cathing... but if I can go back to peeing really well... a sort of no brainer?
kenneth1955 Tucsonjj
Posted
kenneth1955 Tucsonjj
Posted
thomas77847 kenneth1955
Posted
I didn't have urolift done. I had Resume!!
Tucsonjj kenneth1955
Posted
thanks, Ken! I didn't know that... I'll have to ask the new UroDoc... I think my biggest problem, and has been since my mid to late 20's (62 now)... is the bladder neck... Maybe I'll have that done first? Or see if the UroDoc agrees that is the main issue... IF it is the prostate, then the Urolift makes more sense to do first, and the BNI may not be necessary...?? How long to heal from a UroLift?
Tucsonjj kenneth1955
Posted
thanks, Ken, my new UroDoc says 5 years and the feedback is very good. Bummer if I can't have both, I didn't realize that the Urolift needed a lot of healing... sutures? I'll have to ask my Doc about not doing both... I personally would not mind, maybe do one, them the other a month or two later? Longer?
I plan on taking Propophol instead of general... so no real biggie... I had it for a endoscopy and it was pretty mild... though I made the mistake of ignoring everyone and drove myself home and nearly got in a big crash from my attention drifting! felt MELLOW!! ;-)
kenneth1955 Tucsonjj
Posted
Urolift does not need a lot to heal but we are all different. I had the Urolift on a Monday catheter out on Wed morning. Did burn for the first day but by sat I was good to go. I got yelled at by my doctor because 5 days after the catheter I masturbated because I wanted to make sure there was no problem. No problem with erection and my ejaculation and orgasm was very intense. It was a little pink but it cleared after a few weeks. I had 4 clips The reason they tell you 4 weeks is because they do not want you to have any sex or anything with a lot of movement. They want the clips to a hare to the prostate. I am still wide open after 3 1/2 years. Just tell your doctor you want to do the Urolift first to give it a chance. That may be all you need. Please don't cause yourself more problems if you don't need to Take care Ken
Tucsonjj kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 Tucsonjj
Posted
Yes no weights. The treadmill I think may be ok if you take it slow and just walk for about 10 minutes to start and work up from there. Please go slow. Don't mess yourself up Ken
Tucsonjj kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks, Ken, will do... I'll drop you a note when I schedule it... not sure, but probably by year end... appreciate your help... again! JJ
kenneth1955 Tucsonjj
Posted
D_Gee_322 kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 D_Gee_322
Posted
davidaami kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 davidaami
Posted