What are some good questions to ask my Uro Doc.?
Posted , 10 users are following.
Hello again everyone. This last week I have put some concerns out there in regards to Urolift that's not doing anything and it was only 9 months ago with 5 devices, urine retention, lower back pain, etc.
I have an appt on Friday the 22nd (2 days out) and I am putting my feelers out there for some good questions I should ask him.
Re: X-rays to see my implants, creatine levels, current size of prostate, other options avail. ?? And I know some of you have been through hell and back. I learned along time ago that wisdom is only good if you use it!
1 like, 37 replies
mel77 anthony2858
Posted
I liked what you wrote and wisdom is good support. I'm just guessing that we are around the same age. But I can be wrong. I also have an appointment this Thurs with a urologist. My complaint is that my stream is fairly weak and can't empty my bladder all the way. Sometime, I just struggle to make a pee. I am also under the care of a cardiac surgeon who is watching me for edema and retention of water. I have stage 3 kidney disease and my doctor is concerned but not overly concerned. 2 days ago, I had an appointment to see him. He checked my GFR and creatine. Both were in the abnormal stage. GFR should be 70 or > Mine is about 52. Never do you want it to go to 35 as that would be stage 5 or dialisis time. I kind of had to go to a uro asap to get a blood test for what is going on. He was worried about my potassium being out of whack but after checking it, showed a leve 4. That part is good. He was pretty thourough doing the exam as he checked for swelling in my abdominal region and carefully checked my weight. I am not obese but a little weighty. This was determined whether I had to have IV Lasix or another type of fluid release such as drinking a terrible tasting carbonated medicine which empties your bowels. The doctor is concerned about my prostrate restricting my uretha where fluid can back up to the kidneys and causes more damage. I certainly don't want this. I would be interested in what he finds and what remedy he has. I already had 2 TURPS over 25 years ago so I know what can be expected. At that time, there weren't many new procedures like today. Fortunately, healing was rapid and not too painful. I didn't have to catherize myself either. All it took was 3 days in the hospital and be discharged. If you want I can share the findings of what the urologist says. Meanwhile stay in good health.
mel
kenneth1955 anthony2858
Posted
derek76 kenneth1955
Posted
Jim I think your doing great. Why do something that you don't need. I have a urolift done a yeas ago. My doctor cold not get the scope in my prostate because it was so big. He never said anything about a turp or laser coring of the prostate. I would have said no anyway. I had a urolift done and all was good untill december 2015 Had to have them all tighted because my prostate got smaller. Who knows why. But it good for me. Keep doing what your doing. Have fun and all you can..Ken
anthony2858 derek76
Posted
You mention that you had the Urolift procedure done and in December 2015 you had to have the devices "tightened" because your prostate had gotten smaller. Since the Urolift is so new in the States when and where did you get yours done? Also, I did not know that they could be "tightened". Perhaps that is what I need to have done? I had my Urolift done in July 2015 and honestly feel like the results were very short lived.
Also I noticed that your last post shows that when you signed out you signed out as "Ken" but the post looks like it came from Derek?? Just want to know who I am replying to.
Thanks, Anthony!
derek76 anthony2858
Posted
Ken normally posts anti Uro and surgery posts as he has had some poor experiences with Uro's over the years and naturally wants to warn others what to look out for.
kenneth1955 anthony2858
Posted
anthony2858 kenneth1955
Posted
i did not know that the devices in the Urolift could be tightened. I will bring that up to my Uro doc tomorrow.
james87669 derek76
Posted
derek76 james87669
Posted
kenneth1955 anthony2858
Posted
kenneth1955 james87669
Posted
John-T anthony2858
Posted
Sorry to hear about your problems with Urolift, why don't you consider HOLEP which has great reviews and lot's of good feedback in the forum, I'm on a waiting list to get HOLEP most likely in May sometimes, I have been wearing a catheter for the past 6 weeks. The problem with Urlolift is that it's too new of a technology not practised everywhere, also don't forget that the prostate keeps growing so you will always have problems and terrible pain, I know that with HOLEP you will most likely have a condition called: Retrograted Ejaculation where sperm goes straight to the bladder instead of coming out your penis during sex, small price to pay for a long term solution.
Good luck
John
anthony2858 John-T
Posted
I hav considered the HOLEP and put it in the same boat as the TURP in as where there is actual tissue cut out in one form or another. I am only 57 and RE is a major consideration at this stage in my life. That is one of the reasons that I went with the Urolift, which is not out of the realm of possibility that I have that whole procedure revisited and perhaps can be adjusted, tightened, or possibly another device or two put in. I just don't want to throw away all that has already been done. Also I am considering the PAE as well, I know that there is a small chance of side effects, however with the proper choice in where and who does it I think will alleviate this done to nil. So I am still in the thought process of it all. I do have an appoint with my Uro doc tomorrow and I am going to have some serious discussion with him.
Thank you for your input! Much appreciated.
derek76 anthony2858
Posted
Laser surgery burns the tissue away in a practically bloodless way and seals it as it goes along and is much more precise than TURP. Some of the after bleeding comes from trauma to the urethra that acts as a sponge and soaks up blood.
Have you watched any of the procedures on YouTube?
Are you in the UK? I had my PVP at the Freeman in Newcastle who were one of the first to do trials of it. I was the teams 38th patient and my surgeons 8th. A few years ago they decided that PVP and HOLEP were about of equal merit and after discussion opted for HOLEP as their standard procedure. HOLEP is a more difficult procedure to do and requies more training.
I had an appointment when my prostate regrew elsewhere with one of the first two surgeons to do PVP in the UK by then using the second generation equipment. He said that initially they had thought that PVP was a very easy operation but as time went by they realised that it had to performed with more care.
anthony2858 derek76
Posted
Still, the HOLEP and TURP do basically the same thing, cuts away at the prostate. In one fashion or another, just different techniques. A little bleeding here, a little bleeding there, and in some cases I'm sure a lot.
The day may come where I have no choice to do that, but for now I feel too young for such an aggressive procedure. However I thank you for ringing in with your thoughts. Also thank you for helping out in the pioneering phase of then, a new procedure. That can be a little scary!
Have a great day! Anthony
kenneth1955 anthony2858
Posted
anthony2858 kenneth1955
Posted
derek76 anthony2858
Posted
If I were back at square one I would probably favour PAE but my recovery from PVP was quick and blood free.