Added to Saved items
This article is for Medical Professionals

Professional Reference articles are designed for health professionals to use. They are written by UK doctors and based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. You may find the Ankylosing Spondylitis article more useful, or one of our other health articles.

Read COVID-19 guidance from NICE

Treatment of almost all medical conditions has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. NICE has issued rapid update guidelines in relation to many of these. This guidance is changing frequently. Please visit https://www.nice.org.uk/covid-19 to see if there is temporary guidance issued by NICE in relation to the management of this condition, which may vary from the information given below.

Synonyms: rheumatoid spondylitis, Marie-Strümpell disease, von Bechterew's disease

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic seronegative spondyloarthropathy which primarily involves the axial skeleton (ie sacroiliitis and spondylitis). The aetiology is unknown but involves the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. The diagnosis is made by combining clinical criteria of inflammatory back pain and enthesitis (inflammation at the site of bone insertion of ligaments and tendons) or arthritis with radiological findings.

It is thought that ankylosing spondylitis is triggered by an environmental factor (or factors) in people who are genetically predisposed.[1]

Axial spondyloarthritis includes ankylosing spondylitis (radiographic axial spondyloarthritis) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. See also the separate Axial Spondyloarthritis article for further details, including a summary of the current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline.[2]

  • The prevalence of AS is believed to range from 0.05% to 0.23%.
  • Estimates of the prevalence vary between countries, with mean prevalence per 10,000 of 31.9 in North America, 23.8 in Europe, 16.7 in Asia, 10.2 in Latin America and 7.4 in Africa.
  • Around twice as many men have AS compared with women.
  • Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis affects a similar number of women as men.
  • AS most commonly begins between 20 and 30 years of age, with 90-95% of people aged less than 45 years at disease onset.
  • More than 90% heritability has been estimated for axial spondyloarthritis. The most important genetic risk factor is human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27). The prevalence of HLA-B27 usually reflects the prevalence of axial spondyloarthritis within a population. However axial spondyloarthritis can occur in people without HLA-B27.
  • Symptoms may be subtle in early stages or mild disease, with an insidious onset over several months to years.
  • AS usually presents before the age of 30 years.
  • Most patients have mild chronic disease or intermittent flares with periods of remission.
  • Systemic features are common. Fever and weight loss may occur during periods of active disease. Fatigue is also prominent.
  • Morning stiffness is characteristic.
  • Inflammatory back pain:
    • Often improves with moderate physical activity.
    • Unlike mechanical back pain, patients often experience stiffness and pain which awaken them in the early morning hours.
    • The spinal disease starts in the sacroiliac joints (bilateral lumbosacral region) and may be felt as diffuse nonspecific buttock pain.
    • On examination there is often tenderness of the sacroiliac joints or a limited range of spinal motion.
    • In the advanced stages, patients develop loss of lumbar lordosis, buttock atrophy, and an exaggerated thoracic kyphosis with a stooped forward neck sometimes referred to as a 'question mark posture'.
  • Peripheral enthesitis:
    • Occurs in approximately a third of patients.
    • Common sites - behind the heel (Achilles tendonitis), the heel pad (plantar fasciitis) and the tibial tuberosity.
    • Lesions tend to be painful, especially in the morning. There may be associated swelling of the tendon or ligament insertion.
  • Peripheral arthritis:
    • Also occurs in about a third of patients.
    • Joint involvement is usually asymmetrical, involving the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis.
    • Other peripheral joints are less often and less severely affected, usually as asymmetrical oligoarthritis.
    • In children, AS tends to commence with arthritis prior to spinal disease developing.
    • Temporomandibular joints are occasionally involved.
  • Measure chest expansion, lateral lumbar flexion and forward lumbar flexion.
  • Schober's test - see the separate article Examination of the Spine, which deals with thoracolumbar back examination.
  • Palpate and stress the sacroiliac joints.
  • Examine peripheral joints for synovitis or enthesitis.
  • Always look for extra-articular manifestations of AS, as these occur in up to 40% of patients.

Extra-articular manifestations[1, 3]

Extra-articular manifestations are common. A systematic review found a pooled prevalence for:

Other extra-articular manifestations include:

  • Osteoporosis.
  • Cardiac complications include:
  • Lung involvement such as restrictive pulmonary disease and apical fibrosis. Dyspnoea may occur as a result of costovertebral involvement decreasing vital capacity.
  • Neurological involvement from vertebral fracture, dislocation, or cauda equina syndrome (sensory disturbance in lower limbs and perineum).
  • Renal involvement: amyloidosis is a very rare complication in patients with severe, active and long-standing disease and may cause renal dysfunction with proteinuria and renal insufficiency or chronic kidney disease. Immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy is another association.

NICE recommends referral if:[2]

  • Low back pain started before the age of 45 years and has lasted for longer than three months: refer the person to a rheumatologist for a spondyloarthritis assessment if four or more of the following additional criteria are also present:
    • Low back pain started before the age of 35 years (this further increases the likelihood that back pain is due to spondyloarthritis compared with low back pain that started between 35 and 44 years).
    • Waking during the second half of the night because of symptoms.
    • Buttock pain.
    • Improvement with movement.
    • Improvement within 48 hours of taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
    • A first-degree relative has spondyloarthritis.
    • There is current or past arthritis.
    • There is current or past enthesitis.
    • There is current or past psoriasis.

If exactly three of the additional criteria are present, perform an HLA-B27 test. If the test is positive, refer the person to a rheumatologist for a spondyloarthritis assessment.

If the person does not meet these criteria but clinical suspicion of axial spondyloarthritis remains, advise the person to seek repeat assessment if new signs, symptoms or risk factors develop. This may be especially appropriate if the person has current or past inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis), psoriasis or uveitis.

Urgently refer people with suspected new-onset inflammatory arthritis to a rheumatologist for a spondyloarthritis assessment, unless rheumatoid arthritis, gout or acute calcium pyrophosphate arthritis ('pseudogout') is suspected. If rheumatoid arthritis is suspected, see referral for specialist treatment in the NICE guideline on rheumatoid arthritis in adults.

Refer people with dactylitis to a rheumatologist for a spondyloarthritis assessment.

Refer people with enthesitis without apparent mechanical cause to a rheumatologist for a spondyloarthritis assessment if:

  • It is persistent.
  • It is in multiple sites.
  • Any of the following are also present:
    • Back pain without apparent mechanical cause.
    • Current or past uveitis. Refer people for an immediate (same-day) ophthalmological assessment if they have symptoms of acute anterior uveitis (for example, eye pain, eye redness, sensitivity to light or blurred vision).
    • Current or past psoriasis.
    • Gastrointestinal or genitourinary infection.
    • Inflammatory bowel disease.
    • A first-degree relative has spondyloarthritis or psoriasis.

Modified New York criteria for diagnosing ankylosing spondylitis:

  • Clinical criteria:
    • Low back pain; present for more than three months; improved by exercise but not relieved by rest.
    • Limitation of lumbar spine motion in both the sagittal and frontal planes.
    • Limitation of chest expansion relative to normal values for age and sex.
  • Radiological criterion: sacroiliitis on X-ray.

Diagnose: definite AS if the radiological criterion is present plus at least one clinical criterion. Probable AS if three clinical criteria are present alone, or if the radiological criterion is present but no clinical criteria are present.

AS may overlap with other spondyloarthropathies - eg, psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis or enteropathic arthropathy.

Blood tests

  • No laboratory tests are specific and are often more helpful to exclude other diagnoses rather than confirming AS.
  • Guidance suggests that only FBC and inflammatory markers should be taken prior to referral. Rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and HLA testing are not thought to improve diagnosis in primary care.[1]
  • There may be normochromic normocytic anaemia of chronic disease. ESR or CRP level may correlate with disease activity but these are less useful for monitoring activity than in other inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis. Alkaline phosphatase is often elevated.

Imaging

Advice is to follow local referral protocols on imaging the sacroiliac joints and spine, or to seek specialist advice on imaging ahead of referral.

  • X-rays are the most helpful imaging modality in established disease, although they may be normal in early disease.
    • Look for sacroiliitis or enthesitis (particularly of the annulus fibrosus). Sacroiliitis initially shows as blurring in the lower part of the joint, then bony erosions or sclerosis occur and widening or eventual fusion of the joint.
    • The vertebral bodies may become 'squared'. In later stages, bony bridges (syndesmophytes) form between adjacent vertebrae, there is ossification of spinal ligaments and, in late disease, there may be complete fusion of the vertebral column (bamboo spine).
    • Spinal osteopenia is common.
  • MRI scanning may be useful in identifying early sacroiliitis. MRI of the sacroiliac joints is more sensitive than either plain X-ray or CT scan in demonstrating sacroiliitis. It has a growing role in diagnosis, prognostication and selection of patients for biological treatment.
  • MRI/CT scans - useful in making the diagnosis of a spinal fracture in patients with late-stage spinal disease.
  • Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans are used to assess for osteoporosis but may underestimate the fracture risk in AS, due to new bone formation in the spine.
  • Musculoskeletal ultrasound scanning can help in diagnosing enthesitis.[5]

Bamboo spine

Bamboo spine
By Stevenfruitsmaak, via Wikimedia Commons

By Stevenfruitsmaak, via Wikimedia Commons

General

  • AS is a chronic condition for which there is currently no cure. There are wide individual differences in the impact of AS and the aim of treatment is essentially symptomatic with good control of symptoms, maintenance of function (facilitated by early diagnosis) and management of complications.
  • Refer all new or suspected cases of AS to a rheumatologist. This is for confirmation of the diagnosis, review of current treatment, access to specialist physiotherapy and occupational therapy and the arrangement of follow-up (often as part of a shared care arrangement with primary care).
  • Treatment of extra-articular manifestations may require the involvement of other specialist teams.

Physiotherapy and rehabilitation

  • Physiotherapy, including an exercise programme and postural training, is important to maintain function and, in some severe cases, a period of inpatient intensive rehabilitation may be warranted.
  • A Cochrane review found that an individual home-based or supervised exercise programme is better than no intervention; that supervised group physiotherapy is better than home exercises; and that combined inpatient spa-exercise therapy followed by group physiotherapy are better than group physiotherapy alone.[7]
  • Spinal extension and deep-breathing exercises help to maintain spinal mobility, encourage erect posture and promote chest expansion.
  • Maintaining an erect posture during daily activities and sleeping on a firm mattress with a thin pillow also tend to reduce the tendency towards thoracic kyphosis.
  • Hydrotherapy and swimming are excellent activities to maintain mobility and fitness.

Anti-inflammatories[8]

  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) improve the symptoms of the disease.[9] Commence treatment with an NSAID unless contra-indicated and, in those at increased risk of gastrointestinal side-effects, consider the combination of an NSAID and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor and PPI. Where contra-indicated or poorly tolerated, a standard analgesic such as paracetamol +/- codeine should be substituted.[1]
  • Where NSAIDs do not control symptoms sufficiently:
    • Consider a slow-release preparation if morning stiffness is a particular issue.
    • Add additional pain relief (eg, simple analgesics, amitriptyline) where there is poor sleep due to pain.
    • Local corticosteroid injections are useful for symptomatic sacroiliitis, peripheral enthesitis and arthritis.
    • Oral corticosteroids are occasionally beneficial in short-term use for controlling symptoms. They do not alter disease outcome and they increase the risk of spinal osteoporosis.
    • Refer to a rheumatologist for consideration of additional therapy.

Cytokine modulators

  • TNF-alpha inhibitors are effective in AS. They should only be used under the care of a rheumatologist.
  • NICE guidance:[10]
    • Adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab and infliximab are options for treating severe active AS in adults whose disease has responded inadequately to, or who cannot tolerate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
    • The response to adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab or infliximab treatment should be assessed 12 weeks after the start of treatment. Treatment should only be continued if there is clear evidence of response.
    • Treatment with another tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitor is recommended for people who cannot tolerate, or whose disease has not responded to, treatment with the first TNF-alpha inhibitor, or whose disease has stopped responding after an initial response.
  • The use of TNF-alpha inhibitors is known to increase the risk of serious infections.[11]
  • NICE recommends the use of secukinumab as an option for treating active AS in adults whose disease has responded inadequately to conventional therapy (NSAIDs or TNF-alpha inhibitors). Response should be assessed after 16 weeks of treatment and only continued if there is clear evidence of response.[12]
  • Ixekizumab is recommended by NICE as an option for treating active AS that is not controlled well enough with conventional therapy. It is recommended only if TNF-alpha inhibitors are not suitable or do not control the condition well enough. Response should be assessed after 16-20 weeks of treatment, and continued only if there is clear evidence of response.[13]

Editor's note

Dr Krishna Vakharia, 11th October 2022

Upadacitinib for treating active ankylosing spondylitis[14]

NICE has recommended the use of upadacitinib in treating active ankylosing spondylitis in adults if it is used in the same population as secukinumab and ixekizumab.

That is, it can only be used if tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors are not suitable or do not control the condition well enough.

Clinicians must also assess the response to upadacitinib after 16 weeks of treatment and continue treatment only if there is clear evidence of response, defined as:

  • A reduction in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score to 50% of the pre-treatment value or by 2 or more units; and
  • A reduction in the spinal pain visual analogue scale (VAS) by 2 cm or more.

Clinical evidence has shown that upadacitinib is better than placebo and is as effective as secukinumab and ixekizumab.

Editor's note

Dr Krishna Vakharia, 24th November 2023

Tofacitinib for treating active ankylosing spondylitis[15]

NICE has recommended tofacitinib as an option for treating active ankylosing spondylitis that is not controlled well enough with conventional therapy in adults. It can only be used if TNF-alpha inhibitors are not suitable or do not control the condition well enough.

Clinicians must also assess the response to tofacitinib after 16 weeks of treatment and continue treatment only if there is clear evidence of response, defined as:

  • A reduction in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score to 50% of the pre-treatment value or by 2 or more units; and
  • A reduction in the spinal pain visual analogue scale (VAS) by 2 cm or more.

Clinical evidence has shown that tofacitinib is better than placebo and is as effective as secukinumab and ixekizumab.

Surgery[16]

Untreated AS can cause spinal deformity, with more than 30% of AS patients suffering from thoracolumbar kyphosis. Corrective osteotomy and stabilisation are recommended under certain conditions, such as severe kyphosis or advanced hip arthritis.

The complications of axial spondyloarthritis include:[1, 16]

  • Ankylosis or spinal fusion resulting from new bone formation.
  • Spinal fractures.
  • Cauda equina syndrome.
  • Hip involvement, affecting about a third of people with AS and may require joint replacement.
  • Adverse effects from treatment - eg, NSAIDs (gastritis, ulcers, renal effects), biological DMARDs (infection, immunosuppression, malignancy).
  • Decreased quality of life and work productivity due to pain, stiffness, fatigue, reduction in spinal mobility and physical function, and sleep problems.
  • The course is variable but damage is progressive and irreversible.
  • The prognosis also depends on the presence of extraspinal manifestations (eg, uveitis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease), age at diagnosis, and the choice of treatment.
  • Increased risk of spinal fracture later in life. The spine is made more brittle by rigidity and weaker by osteoporosis. Resultant fractures can occur with minimal force.

Are you protected against flu?

See if you are eligible for a free NHS flu jab today.

Check now

Further reading and references

  1. Ankylosing spondylitis; NICE CKS, May 2019 (UK access only)

  2. Spondyloarthritis in over 16s: diagnosis and management; NICE Guidance (Feb 2017)

  3. El Maghraoui A; Extra-articular manifestations of ankylosing spondylitis: prevalence, characteristics and therapeutic implications. Eur J Intern Med. 2011 Dec22(6):554-60. Epub 2011 Jul 13.

  4. Mathieu S, Pereira B, Soubrier M; Cardiovascular events in ankylosing spondylitis: An updated meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014 Oct 18. pii: S0049-0172(14)00248-0. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.10.007.

  5. Hamdi W, Chelli-Bouaziz M, Ahmed MS, et al; Correlations among clinical, radiographic, and sonographic scores for enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Joint Bone Spine. 2011 May78(3):270-4. Epub 2010 Oct 30.

  6. van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewe R, et al; 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun76(6):978-991. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210770. Epub 2017 Jan 13.

  7. Dagfinrud H, Kvien TK, Hagen KB; Physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD002822.

  8. Sidiropoulos PI, Hatemi G, Song IH, et al; Evidence-based recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis: systematic literature search of the 3E Initiative in Rheumatology involving a broad panel of experts and practising rheumatologists. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Mar47(3):355-61.

  9. Kroon FP, van der Burg LR, Ramiro S, et al; Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs for Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Cochrane Review. J Rheumatol. 2016 Mar43(3):607-17. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150721. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

  10. TNF-alpha inhibitors for ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis; NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance, February 2016

  11. Minozzi S, Bonovas S, Lytras T, et al; Risk of infections using anti-TNF agents in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016 Dec15(sup1):11-34. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2016.1240783.

  12. Secukinumab for active ankylosing spondylitis after treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or TNF-alpha inhibitors; NICE Technology appraisal guidance, September 2016

  13. Ixekizumab for treating axial spondyloarthritis; NICE Technology appraisal guidance, July 2021

  14. Upadacitinib for treating active ankylosing spondylitis; NICE Technology appraisal guidance, September 2022

  15. Tofacitinib for treating active ankylosing spondylitis; Technology appraisal guidance, October 2023

  16. Zhu W, He X, Cheng K, et al; Ankylosing spondylitis: etiology, pathogenesis, and treatments. Bone Res. 2019 Aug 57:22. doi: 10.1038/s41413-019-0057-8. eCollection 2019.

newnav-downnewnav-up