Thrombolytic treatment of acute ischaemic stroke
Peer reviewed by Dr Pippa Vincent, MRCGPLast updated by Dr Toni HazellLast updated 18 Sept 2024
Meets Patient’s editorial guidelines
- DownloadDownload
- Share
Medical Professionals
Professional Reference articles are designed for health professionals to use. They are written by UK doctors and based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. You may find the Stroke article more useful, or one of our other health articles.
In this article:
The enormous initial success of treating coronary thrombosis with thrombolytic therapy made the thrombolytic treatment of ischaemic stroke the obvious next step. Although coronary thrombolysis has now been superseded by primary angioplasty, thrombolysis is the standard of care for stroke if it can be done within 4.5 hours of the known onset of a stroke. 1
Continue reading below
How common is ischaemic stroke? (Epidemiology)234
As of 2022, stroke was the fourth biggest single cause of death in England and Wales.
There are around 100,000 strokes every year in the UK, with around 1.3 million people living with the consequences of stroke.
Stroke incidence fell by 30% between 1999 and 2011, probably due to better management of cardiovascular risk factors in primary care.
Whilst the incidence rises with age, the average age has fallen by 1-2 years between 2007 and 2016, when it was 68 for men and 73 for women. In Scotland, the equivalent ages are 71 and 76 respectively.
There is no age limit to the use of thrombolytic therapy.
Diagnosing ischaemic stroke (investigations)56
It is essential to have a CT or MRI scan to differentiate the type of stroke before commencing treatment. The use of MRI as a first-line tool has the potential to reduce thrombolysis of stroke mimics, but this must not be at a cost of delay. Access to these investigations, and to staff trained to interpret them, must be immediately available 24 hours a day.
Continue reading below
Differential diagnosis
The important differential diagnoses are haemorrhagic stroke, including intracranial haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage, and transient ischaemic attack (TIA).
Management of ischaemic stroke 57
The 2023 National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke is endorsed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) and the Royal College of Physicians. NICE also have a separate guideline on stroke, updated in 2022.
Recommendations include the following:
Thrombolysis with alteplase - also known as tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) - should be the thrombolysis of choice when thrombolysis is being considered. Its use should be limited to the following circumstances:
Haemorrhagic stroke has been excluded.
The patient presents within four and a half hours of having the event.
It is administered within a well-organised stroke service.
Acute stroke services must link with the ambulance service; as well as being able to provide emergency care, they must also have facilities to deal with swallowing assessment, hydration and nutrition, palliative care, secondary prevention and rehabilitation. They must also provide education for all staff who give acute stroke care, including those in the emergency department.
Every patient treated with alteplase should be started an antiplatelet agent within 24 hours unless contraindicated.
Patients who are eligible for mechanical thrombectomy should also receive thrombolysis as soon as possible.
As of 2023, only 10.7% of patients who have a stroke are treated with thrombolysis, and 3.1% are treated with thrombectomy. This is a slight improvement compared to 10.4% and 2.5% respectively in the previous year. Only 40% are admitted to a stroke unit within four hours and only 76.5% spend at least 90% of their inpatient stay on a stroke unit.
A new NICE guidance published in July 2024 authorised the use of a second thrombolytic agent, tenecteplase, on the same basis (for thrombolysis up to 4.5 hours after presentation, when intracranial haemorrhage has been excluded). The guidance says that the less expensive of the two agents should be used. 8
Continue reading below
Contraindications for thrombolytic treatment9
Absolute contraindications include a recent intracranial haemorrhage or structural cerebral vascular lesion or neoplasm, possible aortic dissection, active bleeding (excluding menstruation), recent intracranial or spinal surgery and current severe uncontrolled hypertension.
Relative contraindications include a history of severe and poorly controlled hypertension, prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (over 10 minutes), major surgery in the last three weeks, dementia, pregnancy, non-compressible vascular punctures and an active peptic ulcer.
Complications10
The most serious complication is intracranial haemorrhage - a 2023 systematic review gave the likelihood of this as 1.7 - 8.8%. Risk factors for intracranial haemorrhage include age, hypertension, atrial fibrillation and the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy; however, a haemorrhage can only be confirmed or excluded after appropriate imaging. The Stroke Association patient leaflet gives an intracranial haemorrhage rate of 4% within seven days of thrombolysis and advises that 2.5% of these will be fatal.
Prognosis11
A 2018 study followed over 2000 patients who had received thrombolysis between 2005 and 2015. They found that the number needed to treat to prevent one death was 12 at five years and 20 at 10 years. Thrombolysis reduced mortality by 37% at 10 years (slightly more for those who arrived at hospital within three hours of symptom onset) and on average, by 10 years, treated patients had lived one year longer than controls. At five years, thrombolysis was associated with higher independence scores with an odds ratio of 3.76.
Implications for primary care
Rapid admission
Although the high technology of scanning and thrombolysis is delivered within a hospital system, there are still implications for primary care, the most obvious being that the speed of getting a patient to a thrombolysis unit is critical. A nationwide cohort study in Denmark found that symptom to thrombolysis time of over 90 minutes was associated with a higher risk of death or recurrent ischaemic stroke. 12
Even if the 4.5 hour cut-off for thrombolysis has passed, patients should still be admitted to hospital, as all should have a scan within 24 hours and the outcome for all is better in a stroke unit.
Initial management of suspected and confirmed TIA37
Offer aspirin (300 mg daily), unless contra-indicated, to people who have had a suspected TIA, to be started immediately. Those who are already taking low-dose aspirin should continue with this and not have a 300mg dose.
Refer immediately people who have had a suspected TIA for specialist assessment and investigation, to be seen within 24 hours of onset of symptoms. If someone presents having had a suspected TIA more than seven days ago, they should be referred as soon as possible and definitely within another seven days.
Do not use scoring systems, such as ABCD2, to assess risk of subsequent stroke or to inform urgency of referral for people who have had a suspected or confirmed TIA.
Offer secondary prevention, in addition to aspirin, as soon as possible after the diagnosis of TIA is confirmed.
Patients with a suspected TIA should not drive until they have seen a specialist, who will give definitive advice.
Secondary prevention
This is discussed in the separate Stroke prevention article.
Further reading and references
- Stroke pathway; NICE
- Stroke and TIA; NICE CKS, December 2023 (UK access only)
- National Clinical Guideline for Stroke for the UK and Ireland; Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party, London (May 2023)
- Deaths registered in England and Wales: 2022; Office for National Statistics 2022
- Stroke and TIA; NICE CKS, December 2023 (UK access only)
- Lee S, Shafe AC, Cowie MR; UK stroke incidence, mortality and cardiovascular risk management 1999-2008: time-trend analysis from the General Practice Research Database. BMJ Open. 2011 Jan 1;1(2):e000269. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000269.
- National Clinical Guideline for Stroke for the UK and Ireland; Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. May 2023.
- Rapillo CM, Dunet V, Pistocchi S, et al; Moving From CT to MRI Paradigm in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Feasibility, Effects on Stroke Diagnosis and Long-Term Outcomes. Stroke. 2024 May;55(5):1329-1338. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.045154. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
- Stroke and transient ischaemic attack in over 16s: diagnosis and initial management; NICE Guidance (May 2019 - last updated April 2022)
- Tenecteplase for treating acute ischaemic stroke; NICE Technology appraisal guidance, July 2024
- Baig MU, Bodle J; Thrombolytic Therapy.
- Chen J, Zeng Z, Fang Z, et al; Risk factors for thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb J. 2023 Mar 14;21(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12959-023-00467-6.
- Muruet W, Rudd A, Wolfe CDA, et al; Long-Term Survival After Intravenous Thrombolysis for Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort With up to 10-Year Follow-Up. Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):607-613. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019889. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
- Yafasova A, Fosbol EL, Johnsen SP, et al; Time to Thrombolysis and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Nationwide Study. Stroke. 2021 May;52(5):1724-1732. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032837. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
Article history
The information on this page is written and peer reviewed by qualified clinicians.
Next review due: 17 Sept 2027
18 Sept 2024 | Latest version
Are you protected against flu?
See if you are eligible for a free NHS flu jab today.
Feeling unwell?
Assess your symptoms online for free