Skip to main content

Low back pain and sciatica

Medical Professionals

Professional Reference articles are designed for health professionals to use. They are written by UK doctors and based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. You may find the Lower back pain article more useful, or one of our other health articles.

Continue reading below

Introduction to back pain and sciatica

Low back pain is an extremely common problem that is often poorly managed. Back pain is a particular challenge because it is so common, demanding of medical resources and a major cause of physical, psychological and social disability. Most back pain is simple and self-limiting but it is important to recognise that which is not.

See also the separate Examination of the Spine, Spinal Stenosis and Back Pain in Children articles.

Definitions of back pains1

  • Mechanical back pain arises from the spinal joints, vertebrae or soft tissues and characteristically it varies with posture and is exacerbated by movement.

  • A specific cause such as intervertebral disc prolapse, vertebral fracture or facet joint injury may be identified in some cases.

  • Nonspecific low back pain is diagnosed when lower back pain cannot be attributed to a specific cause.

  • Inflammatory low back pain is caused by rheumatoid conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis affecting the spinal joints. It tends to present with pain and stiffness on waking and is improved by movement. It tends to have an insidious onset and follows a chronic course.

  • Low back pain may be classified as acute (present for less than six weeks) or chronic (present for more than six weeks).

Continue reading below


  • Back pain is extremely common. About 60% of people in the UK report back pain at some time in their lives.

  • A UK population-based cross-sectional study of people aged 25 years and older found the one-month period prevalence of low back pain to be around 30%, peaking at age 41-50 years. The one-year prevalence of chronic low back pain is about 1%1.

  • For most people, low back pain is nonspecific and serious specific causes are rare1.

  • Highly demanding jobs, prolonged standing and awkward lifting are the most consistent factors predisposing to low back pain2.

  • Obesity increases risk. Other risk factors include psychosocial work-related stress and family history.


History should include:

  • Establishing when the pain started.

  • Confirming whether pain was sudden or gradual in onset.

  • Identifying the location of the pain.

  • Enquiring whether there is pain radiation to anywhere else.

  • Establishing whether there are aggravating or relieving factors.

  • Confirming whether the patient has had this problem previously.

  • Noting the patient's occupation, what it involves and hobbies or sport.

  • Asking the patient to confirm what they think caused the pain.

  • Noting past medical history. Steroid use predisposes to osteoporosis. Establish whether there has been malignancy that metastasises to bone (lung, breast, prostate, thyroid, kidney) or myeloma.

  • Asking the patient to confirm how they have been managing the condition. This includes analgesics taken, whether they have been adequate and the patient's attitude to the condition.


See also the separate Examination of the Spine article.

  • A brief examination for acute back pain is recommended with the patient undressed, revealing the spine and standing.

  • The brief examination should incorporate: inspection, palpation, brief neurological examination and an assessment of function.

  • More detailed neurological examination will be necessary if the history suggests any red flags - eg, confirming saddle anaesthesia and diminished anal tone if cauda equina syndrome (CES) is suspected.

  • Passive straight leg raising is often used to assist diagnosis of nerve root pain. A Cochrane review of 16 cohort studies found that it was highly sensitive but specificity varied widely3.

Red flags1

Assess for symptoms and signs of serious spinal pathology but do not base suspicion for underlying pathology on the presence of a single red flag.

  • CES:

    • Saddle anaesthesia or paraesthesia.

    • Recent onset of bladder dysfunction.

    • Recent onset of faecal incontinence.

    • Perianal/perineal sensory loss.

    • Unexpected laxity of the anal sphincter.

    • Severe or progressive neurological deficit in the lower extremities.

  • Spinal fracture:

    • Sudden onset of severe central pain in the spine which is relieved by lying down.

    • Major trauma such as a road accident or fall from a height.

    • Minor trauma, or even just strenuous lifting, in people with osteoporosis.

    • Structural deformity of the spine (such as a step from one vertebra to an adjacent vertebra).

    • Point tenderness over the vertebral body.

  • Cancer or infection:

    • Pain that remains when lying down, aching night-time pain that disturbs sleep, and thoracic pain could also be caused by an aortic aneurysm.

    • Onset in people aged above 50 years or below 20 years.

    • History of cancer.

    • Constitutional symptoms, such as fever, chills, or unexplained weight loss.

    • Recent bacterial infection - eg, urinary tract infection.

    • Intravenous drug misuse.

    • Immune suppression.

    • Structural deformity of the spine (such as scoliosis).

    • Point tenderness over the vertebral body.

A Cochrane review has sounded a note of caution with respect to interpreting individual 'red flags'. Further research on the reliability of combinations of features is recommended4.

Continue reading below

Differential diagnosis

Red flags may suggest spinal fracture, cancer, infection or serious pathology associated with a prolapsed intervertebral disc.

Other causes of back pain include:


  • NB: if the diagnosis would appear to be simple back pain then no investigation is required.

  • If other diagnoses are entertained, appropriate investigations are in order, depending upon the suspicion.

Diagnostic imaging

This is indicated only if serious or specific pathology is likely - eg, red flags15:

  • Plain X-ray of the lumbar spine:

    • Provides the same dose of radiation as around 120 chest X-rays and, in return, offers very limited information and rarely affects management.

    • Should not be used routinely. One study found that in patients with no features of serious underlying disease, early radiology made no difference to the outcome6. Imaging may be appropriate in the following circumstances:

      • If fracture is suspected, X-ray is of value.

      • With metastatic carcinoma. Those from prostate are sclerotic, those from lung, thyroid and kidney are osteolytic and those from breast may be either. Lesions below 2 cm in diameter may not be seen on plain X-ray but a scintillation scan with technetium 99m Tc is much more sensitive.

      • Collapse from osteoporosis or myeloma may be seen.

      • Paget's disease of bone may be seen.

  • CT scans often show stress fractures and spondylolisthesis best.

  • MRI:

    • Gives a good picture of soft tissues, including discs and anything impinging on nerves or the spinal cord.

    • Disc lesions are best displayed by MRI scans. MRI is the most useful investigation in nerve root compression, discitis and suspected neoplastic disease15.

Blood and urine tests

  • FBC, ESR, CRP, urine analysis if cancer, infection or inflammation is suspected15.

  • LFTs may be helpful. Alkaline phosphatase can be elevated in metastatic disease and Paget's disease of bone.

  • PSA will be raised particularly in carcinoma of the prostate.

  • Urinary hydroxyproline will be markedly elevated (with increased bone turnover) in Paget's disease of bone.

  • Nephrolithiasis may produce red cells in the urine.

Other investigations

A wide variety of further investigations may be required when other pathologies are suspected. For example:

  • CXR may show primary or secondary carcinoma or pulmonary tuberculosis.

  • Ultrasound will show renal stones and is the best way to visualise the pancreas. It can also give a good picture of an aneurysm, allowing it to be measured accurately and to detect possible dissection.

  • Endoscopy may confirm a posterior ulcer and allow tests for Helicobacter pylori infection or malignancy.


The principles of management involve keeping the patient active and giving analgesia to facilitate this. Now only in exceptional cases is rest considered appropriate and then for no longer than 48 hours.

Conservative treatments for lumbar disc herniation include analgesics, non-steroidal anti‑inflammatory medication, manual therapy and acupuncture. Epidural corticosteroid injections can also be used to reduce nerve pain in the short term7.

Lumbar discectomy is considered if there is severe nerve compression or where there are persistent symptoms that are unresponsive to conservative treatment. Surgical techniques include open discectomy, microdiscectomy or minimally invasive alternatives using percutaneous endoscopic approaches78.

The basics of management

  • Recognition of those causes of back pain that are a cause for concern and taking appropriate action (red flags).

  • Planning a simple route for recovery with the patient, being positive and reassuring

  • Recognising and addressing any factors that may mitigate against a swift recovery, including negative attitudes and even compensation neurosis (yellow flags).

  • Relief of pain.

  • Addressing issues that may predispose to further episodes, including poor practice at work or poor ergonomics.

Management of low back pain9

  • Give information, reassurance and advice.

  • Advise the patient to stay as active as possible.

  • Consider regular pain relief; lowest dose, short course of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Consider also a short course of muscle relaxants.

  • Only offer weak opioids if non-steroidal anti-inflammatories are ineffective, contra-indicated or not tolerated.

  • Paracetamol monotherapy has been shown to be ineffective and should not be recommended.

  • Do not offer selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentinoids or antiepileptics for managing low back pain.

  • Do not offer gabapentinoids, other antiepileptics, oral corticosteroids or benzodiazepines for managing sciatica as there is no overall evidence of benefit and there is evidence of harm.


  • Consider physical treatments, manipulation or multidisciplinary approaches if not resuming normal activities or if off work10.

  • It is now recommended that such referrals be considered earlier than previously recommended - that is, 'after a week or two' (see 'Referral guidance' recommendations, below).

  • Multidisciplinary approaches include, for example, cognitive behavioural programmes and back schools911.

Management of suspected serious pathology or red flags

If a red flag has shown, appropriate action must be taken. This will mean referral for investigation and for treatment. In the case of CES, for example, urgent referral to a neurosurgeon or specialist orthopaedic surgeon is required.

Management of chronic pain, psychosocial factors and yellow flags

Patients may, quite reasonably, assume that pain is a warning sign that tells us that if something hurts we should not do it. Very often this is true but with back pain it is necessary to work through the pain and to overcome it. There may well be psychosocial barriers to active rehabilitation with prolongation and chronicity as risks. These are called yellow flags. They include12:

  • Belief that pain and activity are harmful.

  • Sickness behaviours, such as extended rest.

  • Social withdrawal.

  • Emotional problems such as low or negative mood, depression, anxiety and stress.

  • Problems and/or dissatisfaction at work.

  • Problems with claims or compensation, or time off work.

  • Overprotective family; lack of support.

  • Inappropriate expectations of treatment, including low expectations of active participation in treatment.

Although there has been some doubt about the value of this approach, the overall evidence suggests that targeting yellow flags, particularly when they are at high levels, does seem to lead to positive results12.

Discuss work and predisposing factors for back pain.

  • If heavy lifting is involved, establish whether there was an induction course when techniques were taught.

  • Often it is not so much the weight but a large, awkward package that causes injury.

  • Seating and posture are often more important nowadays:

    • Consider desks, chairs, computer screens and keyboards at work.

    • Look at time spent in the car and how comfortable it is and adjustment of the seat and steering wheel.

    • Forklift trucks and large goods vehicles may transmit vibration all day.

  • Discuss getting back to work.

  • Discuss what improvements may be made to the workplace to reduce the risk of recurrence.

  • Give the patient a positive attitude and enthusiasm to recover.

Not everyone finds that those in authority at work are sympathetic or wish to make the environment safer but where work is supportive, the prognosis is better13.

Referral guidance15

Remember, when assessing whether to refer, that motor deficits and bowel or bladder disturbances are more reliable than sensory signs.

  • If red flags suggest a serious condition, refer with appropriate urgency. This means immediately for CES.

  • If there is progressive, persistent or severe neurological deficit, refer for urgent neurosurgical or orthopaedic assessment.

  • If pain or disability remain problematic for more than a week or two, consider early referral for physiotherapy or other physical therapy.

  • If, after six weeks, sciatica is still disabling and distressing, refer for neurosurgical or orthopaedic assessment.

  • If pain or disability continue to be a problem despite appropriate pharmacotherapy and physical therapy, consider referral to a multidisciplinary back pain service or a chronic pain clinic.

Physical, cognitive and behavioural therapies

A Cochrane review found spinal manipulation to be no better than other therapies14. However, a study of men and women aged between 18 years and 35 years with acute back pain found that chiropractic manipulative therapy in conjunction with standard GP care afforded significant advantages in decreasing pain and improving physical functioning compared to standard care alone15. A systematic review of osteopathy for the treatment of chronic low back pain was inconclusive and recommended more research16. See the separate Complementary and Alternative Medicine article. A systematic review of acupuncture found some evidence of benefit but further trials are needed17. Traction is not recommended18.

The evidence base for the value of physiotherapy per se is surprisingly small. However, recent evidence suggests that its effectiveness can be increased when used in conjunction with a validated tool such as the STarT Back screening tool developed at Keele University19. This allocates patients to different treatment pathways based on their prognosis (low, medium, or high risk of poor outcome) and is designed for ease of use in primary care20.

It is important to be active and positive to prevent back pain from becoming chronic. If it does, cognitive and behavioural therapy with relaxation therapy may be helpful. A Cochrane review reported that no type of behavioural therapy is better than any other21. Any benefit from 'back schools' for acute and subacute non-specific low back pain is umproven22. However exercise therapy appears to be slightly effective at decreasing pain and improving function in adults with chronic low-back pain23.

Evidence to support the use of peripheral nerve-field stimulation for the management of chronic back pain is limited. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that any clinician using this treatment should explain the risks and benefits to individual patients, inform the clinical governance lead of their trust and register the patient's details with the UK Neuromodulation Register24.


  • Acute back pain may become chronic. This may be because of failure of active management or behaviour by the patient that predisposes to chronicity rather than cure. Targeted care as described above, with the early recognition and management of yellow flags and the use of a validated tool to tailor management to prognosis, may help to minimise the risk of chronicity.

  • Failure to diagnose CES and to take immediate action may lead to long-term neurological damage.

  • Other sinister causes of back pain may have a fatal outcome. The prognosis may be improved by early and effective intervention.


This will depend entirely on the diagnosis. Generally for simple low back pain, if chronicity can be prevented, then recovery should be full but in a variable time. Back pain in old age probably is, as many assume, simply a feature of advancing years. Analgesics may help but it is most important to stay active.

A systematic review found that the majority of patients with acute or persistent low back pain improved within six weeks. Improvement slowed after that time and a minority of patients still had pain and disability after one year25.

If there is not a good response to management within 4-6 weeks, referral for further investigation and treatment should be undertaken15.


The prevention of back pain in the workplace depends on the nature of the work and reference has already been made to the increasing number of office-based rather than manual workers affected by the condition. There is no evidence for the effectiveness of lumbar supports or education and limited evidence for the efficacy of exercise26.

Much more work has been done on secondary prevention, addressing physical and psychosocial issues, once an episode of back pain has occurred.

Further reading and references

  1. Back pain - low (without radiculopathy); NICE CKS, September 2020 (UK access only)
  2. Sterud T, Tynes T; Work-related psychosocial and mechanical risk factors for low back pain: a 3-year follow-up study of the general working population in Norway. Occup Environ Med. 2013 May;70(5):296-302. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2012-101116. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
  3. van der Windt DA, Simons E, Riphagen II, et al; Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;(2):CD007431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007431.pub2.
  4. Henschke N, Maher CG, Ostelo RW, et al; Red flags to screen for malignancy in patients with low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2:CD008686. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008686.pub2.
  5. Sciatica (lumbar radiculopathy); NICE CKS, September 2020 (UK access only)
  6. Andersen JC; Is immediate imaging important in managing low back pain? J Athl Train. 2011 Jan-Feb;46(1):99-102. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.99.
  7. Percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy for sciatica; NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance, April 2016
  8. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for sciatica; NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance, April 2016
  9. Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management; NICE Guidelines (November 2016 - last updated December 2020)
  10. Senna MK, Machaly SA; Does maintained spinal manipulation therapy for chronic nonspecific low back pain result in better long-term outcome? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Aug 15;36(18):1427-37. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f5dfe0.
  11. Lang J, Ochsmann E, Kraus T, et al; Psychosocial work stressors as antecedents of musculoskeletal problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of stability-adjusted longitudinal studies. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Oct;75(7):1163-74. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.015. Epub 2012 May 11.
  12. Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, et al; Early identification and management of psychological risk factors ("yellow flags") in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):737-53. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100224. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
  13. Campbell P, Wynne-Jones G, Muller S, et al; The influence of employment social support for risk and prognosis in nonspecific back pain: a systematic review and critical synthesis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013 Feb;86(2):119-37. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0804-2. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
  14. Rubinstein SM, Terwee CB, Assendelft WJ, et al; Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low back pain: an update of the cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 1;38(3):E158-77. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827dd89d.
  15. Goertz CM, Long CR, Hondras MA, et al; Adding chiropractic manipulative therapy to standard medical care for patients with acute low back pain: results of a pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 15;38(8):627-34. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827733e7.
  16. Orrock PJ, Myers SP; Osteopathic intervention in chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Apr 9;14:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-129.
  17. Lee JH, Choi TY, Lee MS, et al; Acupuncture for acute low back pain: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2013 Feb;29(2):172-85. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31824909f9.
  18. Wegner I, Widyahening IS, van Tulder MW, et al; Traction for low-back pain with or without sciatica. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 19;(8):CD003010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003010.pub5.
  19. STarT Back Screening Tool Website; Keele University, 2013
  20. Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, et al; Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
  21. Henschke N, Ostelo RW, van Tulder MW, et al; Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jul 7;(7):CD002014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002014.pub3.
  22. Poquet N, Lin CW, Heymans MW, et al; Back schools for acute and subacute non-specific low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4:CD008325. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008325.pub2.
  23. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, et al; Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD000335.
  24. Peripheral nerve-field stimulation for chronic low back pain; NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance, March 2013
  25. da C Menezes Costa L, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, et al; The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2012 Aug 7;184(11):E613-24. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111271. Epub 2012 May 14.
  26. van Duijvenbode IC, Jellema P, van Poppel MN, et al; Lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD001823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001823.pub3.

Article history

The information on this page is written and peer reviewed by qualified clinicians.

symptom checker

Feeling unwell?

Assess your symptoms online for free