Benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS) is primarily seen in children and younger adolescents. It consists of joint hypermobility (joints easily move beyond their normal expected range) associated with chronic exercise-related pain. Other commonly associated features include marked fatiguability, tiredness, back pain, joint subluxation and soft tissue injuries.
There is significant overlap between this condition and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 3 (hypermobility type). BJHS is now perceived as a heritable disorder of connective tissue (HDCT) which shares some features with Marfan's syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 3 (hypermobility type).
Significance of benign joint hypermobility syndrome
Joint hypermobility is a two-edged sword, as flexibility is more often an advantage than a disadvantage. Extra flexibility confers increased mobility and agility and is common amongst successful sportsmen and dancers. In general, hypermobility should be regarded as an advantage, provided the child is strong and fit. However, there are some adverse effects of tissue laxity, of which soft tissue injury and pain are the most significant. More chronic difficulties occur when the body has become weak and deconditioned.
Only a proportion of patients with hypermobile joints develop exercise-related pain. However, when they do they tend to avoid exercise. A worsening spiral is set up, with decreasing fitness and muscle deconditioning leading to worsening fatigue, lowered exercise tolerance and, eventually, exercise avoidance. This can be associated with a heightened pain sensitivity. Additionally, many have pain and fatiguability when writing by hand and experience posture-related muscular pains, generalised tiredness and altered sleep patterns and concentration - all of which can affect school performance. Extra-articular symptoms may include abdominal pain, headaches and mood disturbance.
Specialist support is required for assessing and managing BJHS. Care must be taken to ensure that the condition is not over-medicalised.
Generalised joint laxity affects up to 40% of young adolescents (prevalence decreases with increasing age). Girls are generally more hypermobile than boys; children of Asian ethnicity are more hypermobile than those of Caucasian ethnicity. The prevalence of BJHS is lower: most evaluations give figures of around 10%. It is not clear why some children with hyperextensible joints develop pain and others do not[3, 4].
The main presenting features are joint hypermobility with exercise-related muscle and joint pains and some level of fatigue. However, there is enormous variability in symptom severity. Commonly the history is of:
- Joint/muscle pains after activity and at night - usually more lower-limb than upper- limb - most typically, calf and thigh muscles and knees. Younger children tend to report more pain, possibly because teenagers are developing stronger, tighter muscles.
- Swelling, heat or redness are not usually present, unless there is associated injury.
- Muscle and joint stiffness occur the day after activity, often for several days.
- Fatigue, often with reduced exercise tolerance. This relates to deconditioning through exercise avoidance and may impact on all aspects of life, affecting energy levels and concentration.
- Fidgetiness, probably from deconditioned muscles.
- Headaches, often relating to trapezius muscle spasm and poor sitting posture.
- Easy bruising
- Clicking of joints, both spontaneously and deliberately. Clicking the joints will not harm them unless it becomes obsessive.
- Reduced co-ordination and balance, probably secondary to reduced core strength, leading to clumsiness.
- Handwriting may fatigue easily and fine motor control may be affected.
- A small proportion may have problems with abdominal pain with or without bladder and bowel dysfunction. It is not always clear whether this relates directly. Abdominal pain is common in childhood and frequently relates to constipation. Constipation may increase in incidence when there is reduction in physical activity and muscle tone.
- Rare associations are:
- Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).
- Hernia: studies of children with hernia have shown that they show an increased prevalence of Beighton score of 4 or more compared to the general population.
- Uterine or rectal prolapse.
- Joint dislocation (although subluxation is slightly more common).
A 2005 review of a UK population of 125 children diagnosed with BJHS found that:
- Average age at onset of symptoms was 6.2 years and age at diagnosis 9.0 years.
- The major presenting complaint was arthralgia in 74%, abnormal gait in 10%, apparent joint deformity in 10% and back pain in 6%.
- Mean age at first walking was 15.0 months; 48% were considered 'clumsy' and 36% as having poor co-ordination in early childhood.
- 12% had 'clicky' hips at birth and 4% actual congenital dislocatable hip.
- Urinary tract infections were present in 13% and 6% of the female and male cases, respectively. 14% had speech and learning difficulties diagnosed.
- History of recurrent joint sprains was seen in 20%.
- Actual subluxation/dislocation of joints was seen in 10%.
- 40% had problems with handwriting tasks.
- 48% had major limitations of school-based physical education activities.
- 67% had major limitations of other physical activities.
- 41% had missed significant periods of schooling because of symptoms.
- 43% described easy bruising.
- 94% scored > or =4/9 on the Beighton scale for generalised hypermobility, with knees (92%), elbows (87%), wrists (82%), hand metacarpophalangeal joints (79%) and ankles (75%) being most frequently involved.
Diagnosis is clinical, using the widely accepted Brighton criteria. These combine the Beighton hypermobility score (first developed to quantify joint laxity in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome) with symptoms. There are no confirming genetic or biochemical tests.
Beighton hypermobility score
The Beighton hypermobility score is a 9-point scoring system to quantify joint laxity and hypermobility. A higher score equates to higher joint laxity. The threshold for joint laxity in a young adult is 4-6, with scores above 4 correlating well with pain levels in patients diagnosed with BJHS.
|Left little finger||Passive dorsiflexion beyond 90°||1|
|Passive dorsiflexion < =90°||0|
|Right little finger||Passive dorsiflexion beyond 90°||1|
|Passive dorsiflexion < =90°||0|
|Left thumb||Passive dorsiflexion to flexor aspect of forearm||1|
|Cannot passively dorsiflex thumb to flexor aspect of forearm||0|
|Right thumb||Passive dorsiflexion to flexor aspect of forearm||1|
|Cannot passively dorsiflex thumb to flexor aspect of forearm||0|
|Left elbow||Hyperextends beyond 10°||1|
|Extends < =10°||0|
|Right elbow||hyperextends beyond 10o||1|
|Extends < =10°||0|
|Left knee||Hyperextends beyond 10°||1|
|Extends < = 10°||0|
|Right knee||Hyperextends beyond 10°||1|
|Extends < =10°||0|
|Trunk flexion with knees fully extended||Palms and hands can rest flat on the floor||1|
|Palms and hands cannot rest flat on the floor||0|
Brighton diagnostic criteria
These accepted diagnostic criteria incorporate the Beighton scoring system, in combination with the presence of persistent symptoms.
Diagnosis of BJHS requires two major criteria or one major and two minor, in the absence of diagnosed Ehlers-Danlos or Marfan's syndromes. Two minor criteria are considered enough for diagnosis if there is a clearly affected first-degree relative.
- Beighton score of 4 or more.
- Arthralgia for >3 months in four or more joints.
- Beighton score of 1-3.
- Arthralgia for >3 months in one to three joints.
- Back pain for >3 months.
- Dislocation/subluxation of more than one joint, or in one joint more than once.
- More than three soft tissue inflammatory conditions (eg, tenosynovitis, epicondylitis).
- Marfanoid habitus (tall, slim, span/height ratio >1.03, arachnodactyly, upper/lower segment ratio <0.89.
- Skin striae, thin skin, hyperextensible skin, papyraceous scars.
- Drooping eyelids, myopia or antimongoloid slant.
- Varicose veins, hernia or uterine/rectal prolapse.
The main differential diagnoses are the hereditary connective tissue disorders and inflammatory joint conditions:
- Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (type 3; hypermobility type).
- Marfan's syndrome.
- Juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
- Rheumatoid arthritis.
- Ankylosing spondylitis.
Diagnosis is not straightforward, as BJHS and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 3 are difficult to distinguish. One school of thought suggests that Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 3 (hypermobility type) - which is the most common variant - and BJHS are the same condition. There are no genetic or biochemical tests that can distinguish between the two; diagnosis is made on physical examination and medical history.
Which of the two is diagnosed is a clinical judgement as there is no absolute medical consensus. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is more likely to be the diagnosis where there is a pattern of autosomal dominant inheritance, or where there are associated non-benign medical conditions such as mitral valve prolapse, uterine, rectal or bladder prolapse and (in particular) recurrent dislocations. BJHS may be the diagnosis where the main symptoms are pain and joint hypermobility with little in the way of associated conditions. However, one school of thought is that there is no need to distinguish because the two disorders are the same thing.
There is some overlap in symptoms with fibromyalgia; both conditions may share heightened central pain sensitivity.
Management begins with the assessment, which should include a full history, symptom scoring and discussion of the child's activity levels, including hobbies, physical activity and sleep, the impact of symptoms on learning and participation, and the child's level of understanding of the problem.
It is useful to perform a Beighton score and a baseline assessment of muscle strength. This is done using the Kendal scale, which scores the strength of each muscle from 0-10. The muscles to be assessed should include quadriceps, hip abductors, hip extensors, plantar flexors and core stability muscles. Posture and gait should be assessed with a view to shoe orthotics; also, a stamina test (eg, a six-minute walk) may be useful.
The principle of treatment is that strengthening of specific muscle groups will help to support the hypermobile joints, improve posture and increase strength, tone and fitness. Treatment includes patient education, activity modification, stretching exercises, osteopathic manipulation and physiotherapy. The goal is full participation in all activities.
The aim is for young people to manage their own exercise; however, this may take time. Working in partnership with the child will be crucial to improving outcomes.
The most important factor in understanding of the condition, for patients, is that the pain in BJHS is not a sign of muscle damage or an indication that activity is harmful. It means that the muscles are not strong enough and need strengthening. Increasing, rather than decreasing, physical activity is therefore the solution. Similarly, fatigue is an indicator that the body requires better-paced activity and increased fitness. Gradually increasing activity levels is the best treatment for daytime fatigue; when there is a daytime slump in energy levels, a snack and a walk are a better solution than a rest.
Encouragement will be needed to begin or increase daily exercise. Significant periods of inactivity greatly exacerbate symptoms of BJHS. Encourage normal activity and a return to sport. The most effective exercise programme is a progressive resisted exercise programme targeting weakened muscles which are needed to control the joints in their hypermobile range. If these muscles are completely effective then posture and function will improve.
Return to exercise may need to be gradual. A good understanding of pacing activities needs to be developed by children with BJHS to avoid overexertion leading to injury or discouragement.
Pain can affect concentration, memory, mood and sleeping. Reassurance is needed that the pain is not harmful. It is also important to help parents to develop strategies to promote helpful patterns of behaviour for their child. There will be times of increased pain - for example, after a lot of sport or injury. It is really important that at such times rest is not promoted for long periods of time.
In general, medical approaches to pain management are not beneficial. Instead, it is useful for the child and family to develop their own interventions to reduce the pain. These can be distractors such as activities, music and TV, as well as positive coping statements, relaxation scripts, aromatherapy oils, exercises, comforting objects and pictures.
Some patients will have already developed a chronic pain syndrome at the time of presentation. These patients benefit from a comprehensive pain management programme, incorporating cognitive behavioural therapy techniques.
A commitment to exercise is needed. Physiotherapy can help to promote this using specific exercises that can be incorporated into daily life. The aim of physiotherapy is:
- To restore full muscle strength and function throughout the full range of movement.
- To restore effective movement patterns.
- To improve general fitness.
- To restore normal range of movement.
- To provide education, reassurance, advice and pain management and to develop problem solving.
- To provide advice on activities which are vital to maintain strength and stamina.
- To provide advice on and help with postural alignment which will help ensure the exercise programme is effective.
- To provide advice on core strengthening exercises which are helpful for strength, stability, balance and posture.
- To provide advice on stretches which are used to maintain muscle length and joint range and to iron out old injuries.
- To incorporate programmes based on enhancing proprioception, using mirrors for feedback. Such programmes have achieved good results.
Patients with BJHS tend to have poor tolerance of repetitive activity, experiencing pain and fatigue the following day. They also tend to have increased pain hypersensitivity. This is a normal response to an increased level of exercise and is not an indication of damage. Nevertheless, exercises using high repetitions and low weights are very effective.
Patients may also have reduced proprioception, making it harder for them to carry out exercises correctly alone. Supervision of exercises is important, particuarly early on.
Occupational therapy (OT)
OT may be helpful for participation in activities of daily living and helping with appropriate interventions. This may include building skills, suggesting strategies, helping with pacing activity and educating the young person and others in order to enable independence in daily activities. An OT assessment in school may also be helpful. Assistance with writing instruments, seating, desks and bags may all be helpful interventions.
Footwear should be supportive if ankles are weak. Orthotics may be prescribed where the positioning and function of the feet may contribute to symptoms.
Sport will be greatly beneficial in the long term but it is important to be sure that the child is fit enough to participate at the level chosen, in the chosen sport. It may be necessary to build up strength and stamina first to avoid being set up to fail or, worse still, being injured. Particular care needs to be taken around trampolining and bouncy castles, which put particular strain on hypermobile joints. Children with hyperextensible joints typically do well in activities in which flexibility is desirable, such as gymnastics and ballet; however, if repeated dislocations occur, these activities may need to be replaced with those which place less strain on the joints.
This is important, since obesity correlates with increasing pain scores due to the added strain on the joints. Being underweight - with weaker, unsupportive muscles - also has a negative impact. Dietary advice should aim to address both weight and any constipation.
If mood is low then engagement and motivation are less likely to be positive and this may need to be separately addressed. Sleep management should also be discussed.
With the exception of orthotics in selected cases, none should be required. Wheelchairs and crutches are particularly unhelpful in the long term, encouraging illness behaviour.
Ongoing support may be necessary for some time. See below for contact details.
Guidance for schools
Schools may benefit from advice on helping pupils with BJHS. This includes all of the above. In addition:
- Sporting activity should be encouraged, making allowances for reduced stamina.
- Altering seating may help with posture
- Try to avoid the child staying still for extended periods of time. Walking about for brief periods at intervals may prevent discomfort.
- Pupils may need extra time to move between classes and travel around the school.
- If OT assessment suggests handwriting is fatiguing it may be appropriate to recommend extra time during examinations.
- Urinary urgency and bowel problems may be part of BJHS so access to toilets should not be restricted.
- Storage may be helpful for books so they don't have to be carried around all day.
BJHS is generally a self-limiting condition which improves as the child develops increased muscle size and strength, reducing joint looseness. A full return to normal activities is the usual outcome. The speed with which this occurs depends on the severity of the condition, the commitment and effort of the child and family to the management programme and on the level of support they require and receive. Improvements can be surprisingly fast. However, some individuals continue to have problems into adulthood, usually of joint laxity resulting in easy injury.
BJHS rarely leads to arthritis, although problems with the kneecap may develop in those in whom it has recurrently dislocated. Adults who retain their BJHS are at slightly greater risk of developing osteoarthritis of affected joints. A small review of young adult soldiers with the condition found significant associated morbidities, including tenosynovitis, degenerative joint changes and synovitis.
BJHS may be misnamed. Whilst not a life-threatening illness, if it is left unchecked the consequences of exercise avoidance and reduced school performance may be lifelong.
Further reading and references
Simpson MR; Benign joint hypermobility syndrome: evaluation, diagnosis, and management. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006 Sep106(9):531-6.
Ross J, Grahame R, Joint Hypermobility Syndrome BMJ 2011; 342 c7167 (Published 20 January 2011)
Clinch J, Deere K, Sayers A, et al; Epidemiology of generalized joint laxity (hypermobility) in fourteen-year-old children from the UK: a population-based evaluation. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Sep63(9):2819-27. doi: 10.1002/art.30435.
Seckin U, Tur BS, Yilmaz O, et al; The prevalence of joint hypermobility among high school students. Rheumatol Int. 2005 May25(4):260-3. Epub 2004 Jan 24.
J Res Med Sci. 2013 Oct; 18(10): 904–905. Benign joint hypermobility syndrome among children with inguinal hernia Masoud Nazem, Peyman Mottaghi, Alireza Hoseini, and Hesam-al-din Khodadadi
Adib N, Davies K, Grahame R, et al; Joint hypermobility syndrome in childhood. A not so benign multisystem disorder? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jun44(6):744-50. Epub 2005 Feb 22.
Grahame R; Joint hypermobility syndrome pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009 Dec13(6):427-33.
Guidelines for Management of Joint Hypermobility Syndrome in Children and Young People. A Guide for professionals managing young people with this condition; The British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology (2012)
Beighton P, Horan F; Orthopaedic aspects of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1969 Aug51(3):444-53.
Sohrbeck-Nohr O, Kristensen JH, Boyle E, et al; Generalized joint hypermobility in childhood is a possible risk for the development of joint pain in adolescence: a cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2014 Dec 1014:302. doi: 10.1186/s12887-014-0302-7.
Smits-Engelsman B, Klerks M, Kirby A; Beighton score: a valid measure for generalized hypermobility in children. J Pediatr. 2011 Jan158(1):119-23, 123.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.07.021. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
Czaprowski D, Kedra A, Pawlowska P, et al; The examination of the musculoskeletal system based only on the evaluation of pelvic-hip complex muscle and trunk flexibility may lead to failure to screen children for generalized joint hypermobility. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 1810(3):e0121360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121360. eCollection 2015.
Hakim A; Is there a difference between Joint Hypermobility Syndrome (JHS) and Ehlers Danlos – Hypermobility Type (EDS-HM)? The consensus view of the HMSA Medical Advisors, Hypermobility Syndromes Association, 2013
Cassisi G, Sarzi-Puttini P, Casale R, et al; Pain in fibromyalgia and related conditions. Reumatismo. 2014 Jun 666(1):72-86. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2014.767.
Kendal F; Muscle Grading and Testing Procedures, 1993
Mullick G, Bhakuni DS, Shanmuganandan K, et al; Clinical profile of benign joint hypermobility syndrome from a tertiary care military hospital in India. Int J Rheum Dis. 2013 Oct16(5):590-4. doi: 10.1111/1756-185x.12024. Epub 2013 Jan 18.