Newborn Screening

1618 Users are discussing this topic

PatientPlus articles are written by UK doctors and are based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. They are designed for health professionals to use, so you may find the language more technical than the condition leaflets.

See also: Newborn Baby Screening Tests written for patients

NEW - log your activity

  • Notes
    Add notes to any clinical page and create a reflective diary
  • Track
    Automatically track and log every page you have viewed
  • Print
    Print and export a summary to use in your appraisal
Click to find out more »

The newborn and 6- to 8-week infant physical examinations

Mothers of all infants are offered two screening physical examinations of their babies, one within the first 72 hours of birth and the second at 6-8 weeks of age. Like the mid-pregnancy ultrasound scan, this is a general examination which can detect a wide range of physical problems. But the following specific aspects of the examination are part of the screening programme and subject to pathway standards. This is used to screen for:

Newborn hearing screening

Parents are offered a hearing screen for their baby within 4-5 weeks of birth. The screen is usually carried out before discharge from hospital, but in some areas it is carried out in the home.

The first test offered is the Automated Oto-acoustic Emission (AOAE) screening test. This involves placing a soft-tipped probe into the baby's ears, playing sounds and trying to detect a response - 'echo' - from the baby's cochlea.

Well babies who do not have a clear response to this test (this is called a 'no clear response') are referred for an Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) screening test.[1] 

The AABR test involves playing sounds to the baby and trying to detect responses from their brainstem via electrodes placed on the baby's head and neck. It measures not only the integrity of the inner ear, but also the auditory pathway. It can therefore detect the rare condition of auditory neuropathy in children who are deaf but have normal oto-acoustic emissions (because the cochlea is normal).

Babies who have spent more than 48 hours in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) or Special Care Baby Unit (SCBU) are regarded as high-risk and are screened using both AOAE and AABR tests, except in Wales and some areas of Scotland where they are screened using the AABR test only.

Any baby referred from the Newborn Hearing Screen should be seen for full audiological assessment within four weeks of screen completion.

Newborn blood spot screening

Mothers of all newborn babies are offered testing for the following conditions by testing a blood spot taken from the baby (often referred to as the 'heel prick' and previously known as the 'Guthrie' test) at 5-8 days of life (ideally on day 5). For many of these disorders early detection can be critical.

  • Phenylketonuria (PKU):
    • Incidence 1:12,000.[2]
    • Current tests look for a combination of total biopterin and dihydropteridine reductase from neonatal blood spots.
    • The original 'Guthrie' test (semi-quantitative and difficult to automate) is being gradually superseded by chromatography, fluorometry or mass spectrometry.
    • Newborn screening allows early implementation of the phenylalanine-restricted diet, eliminating the severe neurocognitive and neuromotor impairment associated with untreated PKU.[3] 
    • Early diagnosis and treatment reduce the risk of neurological handicap from 80-90% to 6-8% (population baseline risk 2%).[4]
  • Congenital hypothyroidism:
    • Incidence is approximately 1:3,000.
    • Currently established on the same blood spot sample as above.
    • Babies born at less than 32 weeks of gestation (less than or equal to 31 + 6 days) will need a repeat test. The repeat test should be done at 28 days of postnatal age, counting the original expected date of birth as day 0, or the date of discharge home, whichever is the sooner.
    • The outlook for this preventable cause of growth restriction and mental handicap has been transformed by newborn screening.[5] 
  • Sickle cell disease:
    • The form of screening for haemoglobin variants depends on the prevalence of the condition.
    • The programme allows the offer of sickle cell screening to all infants as an integral part of the newborn blood spot screening.[6] 
    • Early diagnosis can lead to sickle cell disease-related morbidity rates decreasing, such as overt stroke.[7] 
  • Cystic fibrosis (CF):
    • 1 in 2,500 babies born in the UK have CF.
    • The carrier rate is 1 in 25.
    • Incidence varies around the country.
    • Biochemical screening is now universal. Initial screening detects raised levels of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT), which is then followed by DNA analysis.
    • The most common mutation is in the DF508 gene in 95% of affected individuals in the UK.
    • Neonatal screening has significantly reduced the age of diagnosis of CF. However, a small number of patients with CF can still be missed by the screening programme and the diagnosis should be considered even with a negative screen result.[8] 
  • Medium-chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency:
    • The estimated incidence is 1:8,000-1:15,000.
    • When this is diagnosed pre-symptomatically, the outcome is improved basically by avoidance of fasting.[9] 
  • Homocystinuria:
    • Homocystinuria is a rare inherited metabolic disorder characterised by an increased blood and urine concentration of homocysteine - a sulfur-containing amino acid.
    • The incidence is 1 in 344,000 worldwide but it is much higher in Ireland (1 in 65,000). All cases are inherited as autosomal recessive.
    • Affected individuals appear normal at birth but develop serious complications in childhood.
    • Diagnosis and treatment started sufficiently early in life can effectively prevent or reduce the severity of these complications.[10] 
  • Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD):
    • Worldwide, MSUD occurs in about 1 case per 185,000 live births. Incidence as high as 1 in 180 births in certain populations - eg, Mennonite settlements in the USA.
    • MSUD is an autosomal recessive disorder which can be caused by mutation in at least four genes.
    • Accumulation of leucine, isoleucine and valine and their corresponding ketoacids leads to encephalopathy and progressive neurodegeneration in an affected patient. The brain injury is irreversible if not diagnosed and managed early in life.[11] 
  • Glutaric aciduria type 1:
    • Glutaric aciduria occurs in approximately 1 in 109,000 infants worldwide.[12] 
    • It is an autosomal recessive disorder usually caused by a homozygous or heterozygous compound mutation in the gene encoding glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase on chromosome 19p13.
    • Gliosis and neuronal loss in the basal ganglia lead to a progressive neurodegenerative and movement disorder that usually begins in the first year.
    • Untreated patients characteristically develop dystonia during infancy, resulting in a high morbidity and mortality. Initiation of treatment after the onset of symptoms is generally not effective in preventing permanent damage and so early diagnosis is essential.[13] 
    • Management includes a lysine-restricting diet and carnitine supplementation. In emergencies (for example, brought on by infection) the protein emergency treatment protocol should be used.
  • Isovaleric acidaemia:
    • This is caused by a mutation in the isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenase gene. Accumulation of isovaleric acid (which is toxic to the central nervous system) causes symptoms.
    • There are two forms; an acute neonatal form which leads to massive metabolic acidosis and rapid death, and the chronic form in which there are periodic attacks of severe ketoacidosis and intervening asymptomatic periods.
    • It is closely related to MSUD in metabolic pathway.
    • Management includes giving glycine and restricting leucine.
  • UK variation exists within the blood spot.[14][15][16] Further information can be found at the NHS Newborn Blood Spot Screening Programme's 'Resources for health professionals'.[17]
  • Parents can decline one or all of the tests included on the blood spot.
  • It is important that parents be given time to make a decision regarding the heel prick test (eg, by providing information during pregnancy, emphasising the decision-making aspect and clearly articulating the reasons behind screening) to ensure that they feel they have made an informed choice.[18]

The UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) has over a hundred screening policies on conditions ranging from anaemia in pregnancy to vision in adults. Sometimes the UK NSC will recommend that screening for a condition should be offered and other times that, based on the current available evidence, screening should not be offered.

All the policies are available in the UK NSC's policy database.

New evidence from research is being published all the time and it might be that, even if screening for a condition could not be recommended in the past, new evidence suggests otherwise. This means that it is important for the UK NSC to review all its policies on a regular basis.

Further reading & references

  • Policy database; UK National Screening Committee (policy decisions for conditions screened for and not screened for)
  1. Guidance for Auditory Brainstem Response testing in babies, Version 2.1; NHS Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (March 2013)
  2. Management of PKU (Phenylketonuria); National Society for Phenylketonuria UK (2004)
  3. Berry SA, Brown C, Grant M, et al; Newborn screening 50 years later: access issues faced by adults with PKU. Genet Med. 2013 Aug;15(8):591-9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.10. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
  4. Poustie VJ, Rutherford P; Dietary interventions for phenylketonuria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(2):CD001304.
  5. Donaldson M, Jones J; Optimising outcome in congenital hypothyroidism; current opinions on best practice in initial assessment and subsequent management. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2013;5 Suppl 1:13-22. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.849. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
  6. NHS Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Screening Programme; Public Health England
  7. Quinn CT; Sickle cell disease in childhood: from newborn screening through transition to adult medical care. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013 Dec;60(6):1363-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2013.09.006.
  8. Lim MT, Wallis C, Price JF, et al; Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in London and South East England before and after the introduction of newborn screening. Arch Dis Child. 2014 Mar;99(3):197-202. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304766. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
  9. Schatz UA, Ensenauer R; The clinical manifestation of MCAD deficiency: challenges towards adulthood in the screened population. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010 Oct;33(5):513-20. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9115-5. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
  10. Walter JH, Jahnke N, Remmington T; Newborn screening for homocystinuria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 1;8:CD008840. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008840.pub3.
  11. Gropman AL; Patterns of brain injury in inborn errors of metabolism. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2012 Dec;19(4):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2012.09.007.
  12. GA1 Fact File; Expanded Newborn Screening, NHS National Institute for Health Research
  13. Kolker S, Christensen E, Leonard JV, et al; Diagnosis and management of glutaric aciduria type I--revised recommendations. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011 Jun;34(3):677-94. doi: 10.1007/s10545-011-9289-5. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
  14. Newborn Blood Spot Screening Programme; National Services Division Scotland
  15. Newborn Bloodspot Screening Wales
  16. Newborn blood spot screening; HSC Public Health Agency Northern Ireland
  17. Resources for Health Professionals; NHS Newborn Screening Programme, Public Health England
  18. Nicholls SG, Southern KW; Informed choice for newborn blood spot screening in the United Kingdom: a survey of parental perceptions. Pediatrics. 2012 Dec;130(6):e1527-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1479. Epub 2012 Nov 12.

Disclaimer: This article is for information only and should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions. EMIS has used all reasonable care in compiling the information but make no warranty as to its accuracy. Consult a doctor or other health care professional for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. For details see our conditions.

Original Author:
Dr Hayley Willacy
Current Version:
Peer Reviewer:
Dr Hayley Willacy
Document ID:
2512 (v30)
Last Checked:
24/06/2014
Next Review:
23/06/2019

Did you find this health information useful?

Yes No

Thank you for your feedback!

Subcribe to the Patient newsletter for healthcare and news updates.

We would love to hear your feedback!

 
 
Patient Access app - find out more Patient facebook page - Like our page