Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

86 Users are discussing this topic

PatientPlus articles are written by UK doctors and are based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. They are designed for health professionals to use, so you may find the language more technical than the condition leaflets.

See also: Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis written for patients

Synonym: slipped upper femoral epiphysis

Often atraumatic or associated with a minor injury, slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is one of the most common adolescent hip disorders and represents a unique type of instability of the proximal femoral growth plate. Four separate clinical groups are seen[1]:

  • Pre-slip: wide epiphyseal line without slippage.
  • Acute form (10-15%): slippage occurs suddenly, normally spontaneously.
  • Acute-on-chronic: slippage occurs acutely where there is already existing chronic slip.
  • Chronic (85%): steadily progressive slippage (the most common form).
hip with slipped capital epiphysis

The condition is also categorised as stable or unstable, which has greater prognostic value:

  • Stable (90% of cases): the patient is able to walk and osteonecrosis is very rare.
  • Unstable (10% of cases): the patient is unable to walk (even with crutches) and there is a 50% incidence of osteonecrosis[2].

Radiographical classification is based on the degree or slip: mild (grade I), moderate (grade II) and severe (grade III)[1].

Diagnosis is often delayed - and this is associated with a worse prognosis[3]

  • The incidence is 10/100,000 children per year[1]
  • Overall prevalence is between 0.7 and 10.8 per 100,000 children.
  • Most commonly it occurs in boys at 13 years of age and 11.5 years for girls.
  • It is the most common hip disorder in adolescents.
  • The left hip is more commonly affected than the right; it is bilateral in 20-80% of cases.
  • It is 1.5 times more common in boys, although unstable slips appear to be at least as common in girls as in boys.
  • The incidence varies with racial group.
  • Incidence is rising; there is a trend to it occurring at a younger age and bilateral SCFE is increasing in frequency - all suspected to be related to increasing rates of childhood obesity.

NEW - log your activity

  • Notes
    Add notes to any clinical page and create a reflective diary
  • Track
    Automatically track and log every page you have viewed
  • Print
    Print and export a summary to use in your appraisal
Click to find out more »

Risk factors

  • Mechanical: local trauma, obesity.
    • More than 80% of children diagnosed with SCFE are obese.
  • Inflammatory conditions: neglected septic arthritis.
  • Endocrine:
    • Hypothyroidism, hypopituitarism, growth hormone deficiency, pseudohypoparathyroidism, vitamin D deficiency.
    • 91% will be below the tenth percentile for height[5].
  • Previous radiation of the pelvis, chemotherapy, renal osteodystrophy-induced bone dysplasia.
  • Contralateral SCFE[2]:
    • There is a high incidence of slip in the contralateral hip (27% in one series[6]).
    • Controversy exists over whether or not a normal, asymptomatic hip should be fixed.
    • Scoring systems have been developed to stratify the risk; generally the younger the child is at presentation, the greater the risk of contralateral SCFE. Radiographic measurements of the angle of the growth plate to the neck of the femur are also used.
    • Weight loss to lower than 95% centile, following initial surgery, is associated with a lower risk of subsequent contralateral SCFE[6].
  • Discomfort in the hip, groin, medial thigh or knee (knee pain is referred from the hip joint) during walking, and a limp; pain is accentuated by running, jumping, or pivoting activities:
    • Knee pain due to referred pain from the hip is present in 15-50% of people with SCFE .
  • Pre-slip: slight discomfort or found on X-ray.
  • Acute:
    • Presents within three weeks of onset of symptoms
    • Severe pain such that the child is unable to walk or stand.
    • Alterations in gait, including a limp on the affected side, external rotation of the leg and trunk shift.
    • Hip motion is limited, especially internal rotation and abduction, due to pain.
    • Obligate external hip rotation, Drehmann's sign: demonstrated when the child is supine and the hip is passively flexed and then falls back into external rotation and abduction.
  • Acute-on-chronic: pain, limp and altered gait occurring for several months, suddenly becoming very painful.
  • Chronic:
    • Present more than three weeks after onset of symptoms.
    • Mild symptoms with the child able to walk with altered gait. In a significant number of cases knee pain is reported as the only symptom.
    • External rotation of the leg during walking. Range of motion of the hip shows reduced internal rotation with additional external rotation.
    • When flexed up, the hip tends to move in an externally rotated position - see Drehmann's sign, above.
    • Mild-to-moderate shortening of the affected leg.
    • Atrophy of the thigh muscle may be noted.

Other causes of hip pain - for example:

Anteroposterior and 'frog-leg' lateral X-rays show widening of epiphyseal line or displacement of the femoral head.

  • Earliest findings include globular swelling of the joint capsule, irregular widening of the epiphyseal line and decalcification of the epiphyseal border of the metaphysis.
  • Epiphysis normally extends slightly cephalad to the upper border of the femoral neck.
  • Small amounts of slippage can be detected by the epiphyseal edge becoming flush with the superior border of the neck.
  • Sometimes, however, the only evidence of epiphyseal injury is slight widening of the growth plate.

Ultrasound can detect the presence of an effusion but is rarely indicated.

CT may be indicated if complex surgery is planned[5].

  • Avoid moving or rotating the leg. The patient should not be allowed to walk.
  • Provide analgesia and immediate orthopaedic referral if the diagnosis is suspected.
  • Closed reduction and hip spica casting are no longer used; they are more harmful than symptomatic or no treatment[5].
  • Although surgery remains the standard treatment, the management of SCFE remains controversial - a Cochrane review is currently assessing the outcome of the different surgical techniques, as well as non-operative treatments[1].

Surgery[2]

The short-term goal of surgery is to prevent further progression of the slip and the longer-term goal is to prevent femoroacetabular impingement (FAI); residual abnormal morphology of the proximal femur is thought to be the cause of labral and cartilage damage leading to osteoarthritis of the hip.

  • Single in situ centre-to-centre screw fixation across the growth plate (pinning in situ) under fluoroscopic control is accepted as the most effective treatment for a stable slip:
    • It is minimally invasive requiring only a small incision on the thigh.
    • It is the most common treatment in all situations, stable and unstable, regardless of degree of deformity[5].
    • In one series, excellent to good results were shown in 95% of mild slips, 91% of moderate slips and 86% of severe slips.
    • Arthrogram-assisted pinning may improve screw placement, particularly when fluoroscopic imaging is difficult due to obesity.
  • Open reduction[7]:
    • Most involve an osteotomy of the femoral neck, which has previously been reserved for treatment of severe deformities after the patient has stopped growing; however, it is increasingly used acutely in less severe cases to reduce the risk of FAI[2].
    • Sometimes involves a surgical hip dislocation to create an extended retinacular flap to protect the blood supply to the femoral neck.
    • Routine use of open reduction is not recommended and it remains under evaluation.
    • It may reduce the rate of avascular necrosis (AVN) in unstable SCFE . 
  • Chondrolysis (degeneration of the articular cartilage)[5]:
    • Patients present with global loss of motion and pain.
    • Seen in 1.5% of slips treated with percutaneous in situ fixation.
    • Highest rates occur following non-operative treatment.
  • Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the epiphysis[4]:
    • Strongly associated with instability: patients with unstable slips have a 9.4-fold greater increased risk of AVN.
    • Is a risk factor for early development of severe osteoarthritis of the hip.
    • Occurs in 10-25% of cases and is associated with attempts to reduce a displaced epiphysis before treatment and with osteotomy of the femoral neck[8].
    • It is not clear whether early stabilisation (within 24 hours) reduces the risk of AVN; it may increase the risk[1].
  • Recurrence or progression[5]:
    • More likely in non-idiopathic SCFE or following severe deformities.
    • True prevalence is not known.
  • Long-term effects of altered femoral head anatomy leading to osteoarthritis of the hip.
  • The prognosis depends on the initial degree of epiphyseal slippage and on prompt recognition by the general practitioner.
  • The end result is good to excellent in 91-95% of cases when slip is mild or moderate.
  • With increasing displacement, complications increase and up to 45% of patients have a fair-to-poor surgical result.

Further reading & references

  1. Sattar JM Alshryda, Kai Tsang, Jalal Al-Shryda, John Blenkinsopp, Akinwanda Adedapo, Richard Montgomery, James Mason; Interventions for treating slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE), Published Online: 28 FEB 2013 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010397
  2. Peck K, Herrera-Soto J; Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: what's new? Orthop Clin North Am. 2014 Jan;45(1):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2013.09.002.
  3. Weigall P, Vladusic S, Torode I; Slipped upper femoral epiphysis in children--delays to diagnosis. Aust Fam Physician. 2010 Mar;39(3):151-3.
  4. Novais EN, Millis MB; Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: prevalence, pathogenesis, and natural history. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Dec;470(12):3432-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2452-y.
  5. Georgiadis AG, Zaltz I; Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: how to evaluate with a review and update of treatment. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014 Dec;61(6):1119-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
  6. Nasreddine AY, Heyworth BE, Zurakowski D, et al; A reduction in body mass index lowers risk for bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2137-44. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2811-3.
  7. Open reduction of slipped capital femoral epiphysis; NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance, January 2015
  8. Tokmakova KP, Stanton RP, Mason DE; Factors influencing the development of osteonecrosis in patients treated for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85-A(5):798-801.

Disclaimer: This article is for information only and should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions. EMIS has used all reasonable care in compiling the information but makes no warranty as to its accuracy. Consult a doctor or other healthcare professional for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. For details see our conditions.

Original Author:
Dr Colin Tidy
Current Version:
Peer Reviewer:
Dr Adrian Bonsall
Document ID:
958 (v24)
Last Checked:
02/11/2016
Next Review:
01/11/2021

Did you find this health information useful?

Yes No

Thank you for your feedback!

Subcribe to the Patient newsletter for healthcare and news updates.

We would love to hear your feedback!

 
 
Patient Access app - find out more Patient facebook page - Like our page